David Dobrodt

As we have been exposing the efforts of the imperial forces to run a coup against President Trump since he first emerged in 2016 as a leading candidate, it is clear to us that the attempt to steal the election from him is a continuation of those efforts. There are many irregularities in the vote count, which can and must be exposed. He has indicated that he will fight the attempt to defraud him of his victory, and we will join him in that fight.

It is crucial that we get Americans to understand why a coup is being run. The globalist financial/economic system is crashing, and the City of London/Wall Street crooks are moving to set up a global digital currency with a dual purpose: bail out their bankrupt institutions, and dismantle what’s left of the physical economy in the advanced sector, through imposing a Green New Deal. As Trump effectively organized a movement to re-elect him, in spite of four years of lies and slanders against him, the oligarchy had no choice but to steal the election, to deny him four more years. The recent escalation of terrorism in Europe is a revival of the “Strategy of Tension”, to divert attention from the other corrupt acts they are pursuing, similar to that run against Italy in the 1970s, and against Germany at the time of reunification.

Zepp-LaRouche said that Trump intends to keep fighting, and we must mobilize to defend the vote and to support the revival of the American system, as embodied in her husband’s Four Laws. This is a moral test for the American people, one we cannot afford to fail.

President Trump told a group of Republican National Committee staffers, many of them young people in their 20’s, that he didn’t go to Wall Street to finance his political campaign, in order not to be beholden to those interests. The statement came in answer to a question about funding of his campaign.

“We had plenty of money. And what I didn’t do is call up Wall Street and say, `Send me $25 million’ to the head of every firm. I could have done that. I would have been the all-time King of fundraising if I did that. But once you do that, you can no longer deal properly with them. You just can’t. So I didn’t do that. We could have done that. I could have raised much more money. I mean, Hillary Clinton spent much more money than I did. And in this case, when they raise that much money, that means to me they’re making deals, and that can’t happen.”

While the global London-centered oligarchical establishment pursues policies aimed at imposing a global banker’s dictatorship and launching new wars, Helga Zepp LaRouche highlighted what she described optimistically as “baby steps” toward a New Paradigm, based on scientific cooperation among sovereign states. In her weekly dialogue, she pointed to agreements reached between Russia and China, and nations in Europe — including Germany — and South America, to deliver vaccines, as evidence that there is motion toward realizing her call for developing a “world health system” as the only way to defeat the COVID pandemic, and prevent outbreaks of other pandemics in the future. She also spoke of the exciting prospect of three nations — the UAE, the U.S. and China — with Mars’ missions reaching the planet during the next weeks in February.

She contrasted these positive developments with the dismal outlook presented at Davos, as financial oligarchs were desperately trying to impose a Green financial bubble to bail out their collapsing system; of the failure of the EU in addressing the pandemic and the economic crisis, typified by the prospect of a Draghi government in Italy; and with the regime change operations directed at Russia in the Navalny affair, and against China with the Atlantic Council’s White Paper, “The Longer Telegram”, applying the geopolitical methodology which led to the protracted Cold War against the Soviet Union, which could provoke a nuclear war today. She also spoke of the dysfunctional polarization of the American political scene, with the impeachment trial in the Senate scheduled for next week. She described Pelosi and others as having “gone off the deep end”, especially with their nasty vindictiveness against Trump and his supporters. These baby steps toward cooperation can provide the basis for provoking a necessary “change in thinking” worldwide, in order to break out of the dangerous paradigm created by the City of London and its allies in the U.S. and western Europe.

Check out the IAEA’s new webpage identifying the locations of all known experimental fusion research devices worldwide. Based on information which it collects and then reviews with the International Fusion Research Council, the IAEA launched a new webpage with a world map indicating where the 115 fusion research projects, in 26 countries, are either now operating (90), under construction (8), closed (2) or planned (15). Each project is identified: 94 of them public, 21 private; 64 of them Tokamaks, 13 Stellarators/Heliotrons; 7 laser; and 31 based on differing “Innovative/Alternative Concepts”. By clicking on each site on the map, you can find the basic information on the project and a link to its webpage. As the IAEA tweeted in announcing its new map on Nov. 1: “Have fun!”

The choice, as one proponent of convicting Donald Trump argues, is “between the U.S. as we know it or the white supremacist mob.”  The author of this incendiary absurdity is an anti-Trump columnist for the {Guardian} newspaper of London, which has served as a relentless mouthpiece for the City of London forces behind the coup run against Trump. 

Why the desperation today, when he’s already out of office?  With their financial system heading toward an epic meltdown, the City and its U.S. allies are trying to ram through a global banker’s dictatorship — the “Great Reset” — to put in place a bigger, “Green” Ponzi scheme, before the present one crashes.  Don’t submit to these murderous thieves, join us to put their corrupt neoliberal system into bankruptcy, and on trial for financial fraud.

The Atlantic Council went out front on Jan. 28 publishing a lengthy proposal to try to overthrow China’s President Xi Jinping, linked to a policy document written by a “former senior government official with deep expertise and experience dealing with China.” Frederick Kempe, head of the Council, wrote a Foreword to the document, and published an op-ed for CNBC Jan. 30, highlighting it. The “former official,” who Kempe says prefers to remain anonymous, calls for efforts to encourage a coup d’état against the rule of President Xi Jinping in China. Called “The Longer Telegram,” the document refers to George Kennan’s “Long Telegram” (also anonymous at the time) which called for a “containment policy” against the Soviet Union.

In “Biden Must Draw Red Lines Against China and Focus on Xi Jinping’s Authoritarian Leadership,” for Politico on Jan. 28, Anonymous describes the 85-page paper for the Atlantic Council, largely taken from the paper’s Executive Summary: “Xi has demonstrated that he intends to project China’s authoritarian system, coercive foreign policy, and military presence well beyond his country’s own borders to the world at large,” the author says. “China under Xi, unlike under Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin, and Hu Jintao, is no longer a status quo power. It has become a revisionist power. For the United States, its allies, and the U.S.-led liberal international order, this represents a fundamental shift in the strategic environment. Ignoring this profound change courts peril. Xi is no longer just a problem for U.S. primacy. He now presents a serious problem for the whole of the democratic world….

“The political reality is that the CCP is significantly divided on Xi’s leadership and his vast ambitions. Senior party members have been greatly troubled by Xi’s policy direction and angered by his endless demands for absolute loyalty. They fear for their own lives and the future livelihoods of their families. Of particular political toxicity in this mix are the reports unearthed by international media of the wealth amassed by Xi’s family and members of his political inner circle, despite the vigor with which Xi has conducted the anti-corruption campaign. It is simply unsophisticated strategy to treat the entire Communist Party as a single target when such internal fault lines should be clear to the analyst’s eye—and in the intelligent policy maker’s penning. A campaign to overthrow the party also ignores the fact that China, under all five of its post-Mao leaders prior to Xi, was able to work with the United States. Under them, China aimed to join the existing international order, not to remake it in China’s own image. Now, however, the mission for U.S. China strategy should be to see China return to its pre-2013 path—i.e., the pre-Xi strategic status quo….

“Given the reality that today’s China is a state in which Xi has centralized nearly all decision-making power in his own hands, and used that power to substantially alter China’s political, economic, and foreign-policy trajectory, U.S. strategy must remain laser focused on Xi, his inner circle, and the Chinese political context in which they rule. Changing their decision-making will require understanding, operating within, and changing their political and strategic paradigm….”

And again: “The overriding political objective should be to cause China’s elite leadership to collectively conclude that it is in the country’s best interests to continue to operate within the existing U.S.-led liberal international order rather than build a rival order, and that it is in the party’s best interests, if it wishes to remain in power at home, not to attempt to expand China’s borders or export its political model beyond China’s shores. In other words, China can become a different type of global great power than that envisaged by Xi.”