Top Left Link Buttons

General

Category Archives

The End of 500 Years of Colonialism -For a Dialogue of CivilizationsThe Urgency of a New Global Security and Development Architecture

International Schiller Institute In-Person Conference, 30-31 May, 2026, Berlin, Germany


Summary Videos


  • Moderator: Stephan Ossenkopp
  • Helga Zepp-LaRouche (Germany), Founder of the Schiller Institute: “We will not let European 0civilization go under!”
  • Professor Zhang Wei (China), Director of the China Institute at Fudan University: “Building a Profitable Multipolar World Order”
  • Pino Arlacchi (Italy), former UN Deputy Secretary-General: “Are we sure that the coming economic storm will be global?”
  • Chas Freeman (USA), former U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia: “The Birth, Death, and Prospective Rebirth of the World Order” (via video)
  • Sanjay Tripathi (India), former senior official in Indian ministries: “The Urgent Need for a New Global Security”
  • Dr. Wolfgang Bittner (Germany, author: “Sovereignty, Neutrality, Culture”

Panel 2: Sovereignty and Consensus of the Governed

  • Moderator: Elke Fimmen
  • Jacques Cheminade (France), former presidential candidate, President of Solidarité et Progrès: “A New Beginning to Prevent the Extinction of Humanity”
  • Jürgen Schöttle (Germany), Engineer: “Economical Energy Supply and Sovereignty Are Inseparable”
  • Patrick Baab (Germany), German journalist and author
  • Retired Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Bosshard (Switzerland), former military advisor to the OSCE Secretary General
  • Dr. Jasminka Simić (Serbia), Editor, Radio-Television Serbia, Belgrade: “The China-inspired new form of cooperation among the states of the Global South from a Serbian perspective”
  • Dr. Theodore Postol (USA) , Professor Emeritus of Science, Technology, and National Security at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (via video)

Concert and Dialogue of Civilizations – Artists from China, Russia, Germany, Albania, and others

  • Almira Emiri (Albania) – Albanian concert pianist
  • Irina Zhuravleva (Russia) – Soprano
  • Fan Xu (China) – Chinese baritone
  • Almishba (Bulgaria) and Bulgarian singer,
  • Martin Kaptein – Russian pianist and author; Mozart, Fantasy in C minor, K. 475
  • Gabriele Gysi – Actress and author
  • Andrea Röschke Video presentation (Iran)
  • Dr. Bittner (Germany), Autor, Poems
  • Dr. Mostafa Maleki (Iran) – Iranian diplomat and Germanist: “Hafiz and Goethe, a spiritual encounter between Persia and Germany”
  • Artists’ Association Europe and Asia in Germany e.V. (Germany/China): “The Song of Lotus Picking”
  • Poetry from Various Cultures

Sunday, May 31

Panel 3: The End of 500 Years of Colonialism – Part 1

  • Moderator: Rainer Apel
  • Harley Schlanger (USA), 250th Anniversary of the American Revolution
  • H.E. Eskindir Yirga Asfaw (Ethiopia), Ambassador of Ethiopia
  • H.E. Majid Nili (Iran), Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran
  • Daud Azimi (Afghanistan), Board Member of the Afghan National Peace Front (PNF)
  • Video message from a group of young Ugandans

Panel 3: The End of 500 Years of Colonialism – Part 2

  • Moderator: Claudio Celani
  • Charles Onana (France/Cameroon), political scientist and author
  • Purnima Anand (India), President of the BRICS Forum India
  • Abbey Makoe (South Africa), journalist, founder of the Global South Media Network (via video)
  • Jérôme Ravenet (France), Professor of Philosophy, Sinologist (via video)
  • Wolfgang Riess (Germany), “The Future of the Automotive Industry”
  • Mrutjuanjai Mishra (India), Journalist (Commentator for the Times of India)

International Peace Coalition, Week 157: Science and Culture Are the Core of Politics

June 6, 2026 (EIRNS)—The 157th weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) on June 5 included a deep discussion on the disaster in the Mideast between Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Schiller Institute founder and IPC initiator, and the former Israeli Director of “Peace Now,” (also a former member of the Israeli Knesset), and a Palestinian- American journalist who founded the Community Media Network. The meeting also heard from the conductor of a symphony orchestra in rural Iowa, who is also a hog farmer, which led to a rich discussion of the role of culture in politics during the open Q & A session following the presentations.

Helga opened by noting that both war fronts, in Southwest Asia and in Ukraine, are increasing the danger of world war. Ukraine’s deadly drone strikes on a school in Luhansk on May 22 and on St. Petersburg on June 3, the opening day of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) have increased the angry response from Moscow, with Russia launching extensive bombing across Ukraine and increasing broader discussion there of “teaching” Europe a lesson by using a nuclear weapon. “Where are the adults?” she asked. She noted that some are calling on former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder to be made a delegate to Russia, with many voices objecting, but Helga said “Let him try.” On the other hand, she said Russian President Vladimir Putin’s envoy Kirill Dmitriev has repeated his call for building a tunnel under the Bering Strait, thus connecting the Eurasian continent to the Americas—an idea long promoted by the LaRouche movement. She characterized Germany’s losing the vote by members of the UN General Assembly to represent Europe on the UN Security Council, to Austria and Portugal, as a sign that the Global South is disgusted with Germany’s support for war, and for saying nothing about the U.S. bombing of the Nord Stream pipeline, showing that Germany is a virtual colony to the United States.

The next speaker was Mossi Raz, the former Director of Peace Now in Israel, and a former member of the Israeli Knesset. He strongly denounced Israel’s occupation of Palestine, and called for Germany and all countries to call for statehood for Palestine. The Arab League peace plan for the conflict should be the basis of negotiations, he said. On Lebanon, they are weak—weak government, weak army—and cannot deliver on the agreement they reached with Israel. What can be done? The President of the United States Donald Trump can do it, as has been shown when he told Israel to stop the war on Gaza (although it is clear they never stopped), and to not bomb Beirut. Raz asserted that this made them stop, and the U.S. president—this one or the next one—is the only one who can make Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu stop. He added that Hezbollah takes orders from Iran, but added that Hamas does NOT take orders from Iran.

Next was Palestinian-American journalist Daoud Kuttab, founder and former director of the Institute of Modern Media at Al-Quds University in Jerusalem. He showed his book, “State of Palestine NOW,” arguing that all of the wars in the region are based on the injustice to the Palestinians. He insisted that all nations must call for the recognition of Palestine, even if it is an occupied Palestine, so that they can negotiate with Israel on a state-to-state basis. He also insisted that the West Bank and Gaza must be de-linked from Israel. He said the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) has its problems, and PLO President Mahmoud Abbas is a weak leader—but he is the President of Palestine and we need to recognize him. Foreign leaders who are not happy with Abbas, he said, should engage with the imprisoned Marwan Barghouti (24 years in prison) who was elected head of Fatah. He is strong, moral, honest, and is thought of as the true leader of the Palestinian nation (Kuttab called him “the next President of Palestine” much like a Nelson Mandela).

Helga agreed with Kuttab, that Barghouti has “proven integrity.” She added, however, that with the destruction of Gaza, of Afghanistan, of Yemen, of Syria, that a plan for “peace through development was required, as exemplified by the LaRouche Oasis Plan—see Oasis Plan Is a ‘Model for the World’. She said that if even a few states backed it, it could work.

Kuttab added that negotiations must be comprehensive, “not gradual, like the Oslo Accords.”

Raz added that he had met Mahmoud Abbas many times, and choosing their leaders is the Palestinian’s business.

Helga agreed that getting a Palestinian state is a starting point, but what is required is a “grand design” for the entire region, from India to the Mediterranean. Addressing the needs of all countries, including Israel. China has shown that it can achieve such a grand design, greening the deserts, building large scale development corridors like the CPEC (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor). She said that with such a program, in ten years the desert would become a lush garden, like during the era of the Silk Road. What is needed is such a grand vision, to change the view of the future.

Harley Schlanger then gave a report on the May 30-31 Schiller Institute Conference, “The End of 500 Years of Colonialism -For a Dialogue of Civilizations—The Urgency of a New Global Security and Development Architecture.” He characterized the presentations by China’s Zhang Weiwei, by Amb. Chas Freeman, by Pino Arlachi, the video by four young people from Uganda, by Dr. Wolfgang Bittner from Germany, and the cultural panel, with Iranian poetry, Chinese dance, and Western classical music.

This was followed by Bob McConnell, conductor of the Southeast Iowa Symphony Orchestra for 35 years, and also an Iowa hog farmer, who reported on the destructive economic policies dragging down rural areas, shutting down towns and institutions. He spoke of his commitment to defend and expand classical music. Located in the center of the North American farmbelt, he explained how he recruits people who know nothing about classical music, to understand and appreciate it. Two short videos were played showing McConnell with the orchestra demonstrating the opening and grand finale of Beethoven’s 9th Symphony. This sparked excitement in the discussion period over the connection of beautiful music to intervening for peace.

Other issues brought up in the Q&A included one caller who said she was an economist but was searching for a means to get active politically—but not as an economist, which is “such a horrible profession.” So, she was very happy about doing it through music. Helga said she was glad she loved the music, but that economics was not a “horrible profession,” noting that her late husband Lyndon LaRouche was a great economist, but insisted that economists must be also scientists and artists. The problem, said Helga, is that nearly all economists today are monetarists who know only about money, not real economics.

Another person called for a new “ideology” for the new world architecture promoted by the Schiller Institute and the IPC. Helga said, no not an “ideology,” which is a construct, but what’s needed is the “search for truth.” She quoted Norbert Brainin, the great lead violinist for the Amadeus Quartet, who called the work of their quartet “truth seeking musicians, getting closer and closer as we go along.”

eir


Zepp-LaRouche: Germany’s Defeat at the UN, an Opportunity to Change; Germany Must Cooperate with the Global South!

The following press release was issued on June 5 by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, the founder of the Schiller Institute.

Viewed from a deeper historical perspective, Germany’s failure to win a rotating seat on the UN Security Council offers an urgently needed opportunity to reorient German policy. This author has long argued that, in light of the entrenched geopolitical confrontation between NATO, on the one hand, and Russia and China on the other, the Global South needs to make its voice heard more loudly and forcefully in the international debate—and that is precisely what these states have done by rejecting Germany’s candidacy. German institutions should use the result to conduct an honest analysis of a foreign policy, that has clearly been a complete failure, and to redefine one corresponding to Germany’s true interest.

The initial reaction from Foreign Minister Wadephul and in most media commentaries, however, follows the same long-standing pattern of self-deception: Russia was to blame, they claimed, then the bureaucracy, the application process started too late, etc., etc. Others, such as the FAZ, commented that the UN isn’t that important anyway, and the Hessian Minister for European and International Affairs, Manfred Pentz of the CDU, even called for Germany to cut its financial contributions to the UN as a result.

The only thing that will really help Germany is take a hard look at the causes of the “bitter disappointment,” which could only have come as a surprise to those who have been sitting on their Eurocentric high horse.

The shift in international perception of German politics has been in full swing for several years now. The generally positive image of Germany that once prevailed throughout the world—that of the land of Bach and Beethoven, of Goethe, Schiller, and the Humboldts, of a nation of engineering and inventors—has been lost for quite some time.

The de facto unconditional support for Israel’s actions in Gaza—for which the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant—has damaged Germany’s reputation, and this damage will continue to grow as long as the governments in Berlin maintain their position. For, while the crimes of the Nazis only became fully known and understood by the general public after the end of World War II, Israel’s crimes in Gaza—and increasingly also in the West Bank and Lebanon—are in the spotlight of the global public. The fact that Germany did not approve the extension of the mandate for the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) in December 2025 under pressure from Israel, and has cracked down brutally on pro-Palestinian protests domestically, has further tarnished Germany’s image.

People everywhere are talking about the double standard that prevails in this country. Berlin constantly claims it is the champion of international law, but Chancellor Merz finds the kidnapping of an elected head of state in Venezuela too “complex” to take a position on, and needs “time” to assess it. That was five months ago, and he has still not reached a conclusion.

During the first unprovoked war of aggression by Israel and the United States against Iran in June 2025, Merz uttered the unspeakable words that “Israel is doing the dirty work for all of us”; during the second such attack by the U.S. and Israel, the consequences of which threaten to plunge the global economy into the abyss, he has remained reserved, merely stating that it is not our war.

Virtually no one in the countries of the Global South agrees with the endlessly repeated mantra that Russia attacked Ukraine in an unprovoked war. These countries recognized all too clearly in NATO’s actions the parallels to their own oppression by the colonial powers, and they also remember very vividly who came to their aid during their struggle for independence at the time, namely, the Soviet Union and China.

But what is manifestly lacking in Berlin, is a feel for the tectonic epochal shift now taking place worldwide. At the time of German reunification and the end of the Cold War, Germany undoubtedly enjoyed the sympathy of the so-called developing countries. But it was lost, step by step, to the extent that Germany and the countries of the collective West attempted to impose a unipolar world order through methods such as color revolutions, regime change, unilateral sanctions, and wars of intervention.

The combination of all aspects of this imperial and neocolonialist policy has produced a massive boomerang effect, in the course of which these countries have increasingly sought to distance themselves from the influence of the collective West. China’s economic rise—unprecedented in history—and its policy of win-win cooperation offer the nations of the Global South the chance to finally overcome the 500-year period of colonialism.

The defeat in the UN vote is the long-overdue wake-up call for Germany to finally free itself from its lamentable status as a colony of the Anglosphere (the whole world ridicules our lack of reaction to Biden’s announced sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines), and to stand on the right side of history. This can only mean cooperation with the countries of the Global Majority, that is, with 85% of humanity, on equal footing as equal partners. Instead of spreading racist chimeras, such as Josep Borrell’s fiction of a European garden surrounded by a jungle, we should help Africa, Asia, and Latin America build beautiful gardens of their own. Additionally, we could also ensure that our own bridges are repaired in a timely manner, that our industry recovers, and that our students once again learn something.

In that way, even if unintentionally, Annalena Baerbock will have contributed something positive to German politics through her fraudulently obtained presidency of the UN General Assembly, from which position she had to announce Germany’s defeat in the vote.


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: “Win-Win” Strategy for a Dialogue of Civilizations

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.
Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, June 3, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

The Schiller Institute convened an international conference in Berlin, Germany, May 30-31.  Participants from many nations described the opening session as “inspiring,” given the danger and depravity surrounding us all.

Amb. Chas W. Freeman, Jr. (USFS, Ret.) opened his speech during the opening panel by saying:

We are witnessing the end of multiple epochs. The world of our parents and our childhood is no more. Never has the dire description of current events attributed to Antonio Gramsci seemed more apt. “The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters.” Sadly, my country, the United States of America has become such a monster, foolishly dismembering the world order it originally sponsored.

Over the course of the full, two-day event, panelists from 15 nations, with experience and skills in international relations, economics, science, and the arts, spoke in three sessions. An evening concert featured music and poetry presented by representatives from various cultures and nations. Some 150 attendees came from nations throughout Europe, as well as students from Africa and other continents.

The proceedings of the conference underscore that a new international security and development architecture can be created if those who are willing to champion the solutions presented at the conference join forces.

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her weekly Live Dialogue to discuss how we can seize the opportunities presented to us at the conference. 


The Confluence of Science and Faith

Report on IPC #155

May 22, 2026 (EIRNS)—The 155th consecutive weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) began with comments by coalition initiator and Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche. She announced that the immediate target of the IPC’s mobilization will be the special open debate of the UN Security Council which will be held on May 26, with the theme of “Upholding the Purposes and Principles of the UN Charter and Strengthening the UN-centered International System,” to be chaired personally by Foreign Minister Wang Yi of China, this month’s UNSC rotating chair.

She reviewed the proposals which came out of last week’s EIR roundtable discussion, and added that it was heartening that more proposals, such as the Africa 2063 plan, are emerging that complement her proposals and those which have been presented at IPC meetings.

Zepp-LaRouche has composed a special letter addressed to the UNSC session “What we are interested in is to be putting on the table an entirely different approach,” she said, not the usual geopolitics, but “long term survivability of the region and all the countries involved.” The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) warned this week that, due to resource shortages which are a consequence of the Iran war, on top of the ongoing economic financial breakdown, we are already in the initial stages of a “food price shock,” potentially leading to famines. She warned that those who planned the war anticipated such an outcome; “There are all these crazy Malthusian ideas in the background,” including the policy of so-called “controlled disintegration.”

Science and Religion

Dr. Abdullah Ahsan of Pakistan, Professor of Comparative Civilization at Istanbul Şehir University in Türkiye, identified three stages of a solution to the present crisis. In the short term, there would be former Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu’s proposal for a neutral third party—he proposed Pakistan, Indonesia, Türkiye and Malaysia—to manage the Strait of Hormuz, because the United States and Iran have reached a total deadlock and the entire world has become “victim of this Hormuz situation.” In the middle term, we must revive the concept of a Dialogue of Civilizations, which has been advocated in various forms by various parties, including the Schiller Institute and the government of Iran. In the long term, we must address the view that there is a conflict between science and religion. Modern secularism, Dr. Ahsan asserted, stems from the ideas of German philosopher Immanuel Kant. Ahsan’s studies, however, “suggest that all civilizations in history are rooted in divine guidance.” He cited the subject of evolution, where science and faith appear to diverge.

Later in the discussion, co-moderator Dennis Small posed a solution to the apparent conflict. Man has the capability to creatively modify the physical universe, which is a demonstration of free will and thereby moral capability, and represents a so-called “metaphysical” dimension in what most consider physics, the existence of which refutes the theories of Kant. He cited LaRouche’s Oasis Plan as an example of a creative idea impacting the physical universe.

Still later, Helga Zepp-LaRouche weighed in on this topic. She contrasted the dogmatic vs. the philosophical view in religion. Saint Augustine pointed out that Plato had earlier arrived at similar conclusions to those of Jesus Christ, demonstrating that there is no contradiction between faith and knowledge. Fifteenth-Century Catholic Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa said that evolution takes place through the “lifting” of the lower domain by the more developed organizing principle of the higher domain, and Zepp-LaRouche went on to describe how the Russian/Ukrainian scientist Vladimir Vernadsky arrived at the same conclusion with his conception of the Noösphere. This idea is also reflected in the book of Genesis, where Man is said to be imago viva Dei, in the living image of God, because of his capacity for creativity.

The Worsening Crisis in Agriculture

Jesus Holguin Cazares, President of the Kansas Cattlemen’s Association, reported that the costs of chemicals necessary for agriculture have gone up dramatically due to the Iran war. This places an extraordinary and unsustainable burden on smaller, independent producers. In addition, the cartelization of agriculture poses a threat to smaller producers who cannot compete with enormous agribusinesses, and this translates to higher prices for consumers. Corporations are buying up distressed farms, leading to further cartelization.

Jon Baker, Vice President of the Iowa Stockgrowers Association also reported on the crisis in farming and ranching, which he said was getting much worse as a result of the Iran War, for example, with its effect on pushing up prices for diesel, essential for agriculture. He also took aim at the predations of speculators and agribusiness. Baker gave the example of his own operation, which lost $80,000 in value over the past two days, just due to so-called “market factors.” The mega agro-cartels are increasing their concentration, while independent farm operations decrease.

Dennis Small followed Holguin with a report from the National Front to Save the Mexican Countryside, which just held a 3,500-person demonstration in Mexico City and met with the country’s Agriculture Minister to discuss policy solutions to the crisis. The Front calls for an agriculture policy in Mexico which prioritizes feeding the population rather than coddling the speculators of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and the destructive neo-liberal economic policies such as those associated with Ludwig von Mises of the Austrian School. They are calling for Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum to change policy, but they are not joining the efforts of U.S. speculators and the U.S. President Donald Trump administration to undermine and destabilize her government.

Independent U.S. congressional candidate in New York’s 15th congressional district (The Bronx) Jose Vega offered a report on the progress of his campaign, and commented on how essential it is for American citizens to take up the profound ideas discussed at the IPC meetings. He led a rally at the United Nations yesterday to shape the discussion at the May 26 UN Security Council special session.

Discussion: Fighting the Oligarchy

Zepp-LaRouche elaborated on the various facets of the drive for war being promoted by the leading “Western” faction, emphasizing that “unilateral sanctions are a form of war,” and expressed the hope that these conflicts can be resolved with a new international security and development architecture. In response to a question, she called for global support for Cuba, a major victim of U.S. sanctions, particularly in light of Cuba’s benevolent role in assisting other nations with medical support. Zepp-LaRouche observed that the “Davos men,” AKA the Epstein Class or “the super class of the dead souls,” are interested in perpetuating the crises for the purposes of advancing their geopolitical agendas.

Dr. Ahsan raised the question of how to end oligarchic control over politics, and offered the example of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, which exerts economic pressure on the Israeli regime, as a small step in the right direction.

In conclusion, Zepp-LaRouche reiterated her warnings that both the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the wars initiated by Israel in Southwest Asia, are potential flashpoints for nuclear war. Co-moderator Dennis Speed noted that next week’s meeting will mark the 156th-consecutive weekly meeting of the IPC, the three-year anniversary of its founding. The sort of persistence demonstrated by the IPC in carrying on these meetings will be important in building the grass-roots machine required to change the policies of the United States and Europe. [eir]


To the Governments of the United Nations: A Policy to Bring Peace and Development to Southwest Asia

May 17, 2026

On May 26, China, as the rotating chair of the United Nations Security Council, will convene a meeting under the theme “Upholding the Purposes and Principles of the UN Charter and Strengthening the UN-Centered International System.” The meeting will occur with the world at a historical branching point, where humanity can choose to go in one of two very different directions. The unprovoked and aggressive war against Iran, and its ensuing effects, has placed the Middle East at an impasse and threatens a potentially fatal escalation into a global economic depression or even global nuclear war. At the same time, the meetings between President Xi Jinping and President Donald Trump in Beijing have opened the door to a new level of cooperation between the world’s two largest economies, creating an opportunity to implement an entirely different policy than that which created today’s crisis. Therefore, it is a very precious moment in history, which must not be missed.

Such a policy was actually discussed and elaborated at the recent EIR Emergency Roundtable on May 15, “The Iran War and the ‘Controlled Disintegration’ of the World Economy.” Speaking there was former Prime Minister of Türkiye Ahmet Davutoğlu, along with Iranian Ambassador to Mexico Abolfazl Pasandideh, former UN Special Rapporteur for Palestine Richard Falk, and others. Prof. Davutoğlu insisted that bilateral U.S.-Iran bargaining cannot resolve the regional crisis, saying only “a comprehensive regional framework” can produce sustainable peace. He outlined his recent proposal consisting of four converging issues, where “progress on any one front is unlikely without parallel movement on the others”:

1. The Strait of Hormuz: Form a coalition of trusted intermediaries, such as Türkiye, Pakistan, Malaysia, and Indonesia, to administer the Strait under a UN Security Council mandate.

2. Nuclear arrangements: Establish a new agreement whereby Iran would deposit enriched uranium in Türkiye in exchange for fuel for civilian use, reaffirm its commitment not to pursue nuclear weapons, and have its right to peaceful nuclear energy formally recognized by the U.S. Over time, the region would move toward freedom from nuclear weapons “including those held by Israel.” (It should be noted that this was the basis for the 2010 Tehran Agreement, which Davutoğlu helped mediate, along with Brazil and the IAEA, and which was rejected by President Obama at the time. Notably, President Lula of Brazil handed President Trump a copy of this agreement during his recent May 7 visit to Washington.)

3. Regional security architecture: A multilayered structure of confidence-building and regional security would be established, evolving toward “a Middle Eastern equivalent of the 1975 Helsinki Accords.”

4. Palestine: Israel would be offered integration into the architecture—full diplomatic normalization and formal guarantees—in exchange for recognizing Palestinian statehood and ending military operations in Lebanon.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute and Editor-in-Chief of EIR magazine, had opened the roundtable dialogue by proposing a complete policy change for Southwest Asia, namely that the nations of the entire region, from India to the Mediterranean, from the Caucasus to the Gulf, adopt a joint policy of “Peace through Development.” An integrated “Extended Oasis Plan,” in which a program for reversing the desertification of Southwest Asia, modelled on China’s transformation of Xinjiang province and its northwest deserts, is combined with the extension of development corridors throughout Southwest Asia. As in the times of the ancient Silk Road, the Middle East can become the hub connecting Asia, Africa and Europe again, with a bright future for all countries which are now in a state of humanitarian crisis and poverty as a result of interventionist wars.

When Zepp-LaRouche proposed to add the Extended Oasis Plan to the proposal put on the table by Davutoğlu, which is actually very similar to the Tehran Agreement of 2010 signed by Türkiye, Brazil and Iran, the latter replied:

“I fully agree. The best way of peace is economic interdependency. There is no other way. You can sign peace plans, you can make many declarations, but the best way of peace is economic interdependency. Whenever you have economic interdependency, nobody will be starting a war. So, economic interdependency means development.” Davutoğlu added that the best response to this war is to create a sense of “regional belonging, supporting each other. And I fully share your opinion; and we can bring these proposals together, a geopolitical solution framework, as well as a developmental, visionary project together.”

The participants in the EIR Roundtable agreed, therefore, to send this combined proposal to the governments convening the UN Security Council special session on May 26, requesting that it be taken into consideration at this meeting. Even as the UN Charter must be upheld, the UN is nevertheless in urgent need of reform, which would give the Global Majority a proportionate representation. Part of this reform must be the establishment of a new security and development architecture, which must take into account the interest of every single country on the planet.

A combination of Mr. Davutoğlu’s proposal and the Extended Oasis Plan can be an indispensable component of such a new architecture.

Any and all of the participants in the EIR roundtable stand prepared for further assistance, if so required.

Sincerely yours,

Helga Zepp-LaRouche
Founder, Schiller Institute
Editor-in-Chief, EIR
May 17, 2026


Resources




Create Peace Where War Divides: LaRouche’s Oasis Plan

Build nuclear power plants for desalination, new transportation corridors, new ports—create a future for the next fifty years! That’s the only way to put together an idea of a common interest for everyone in the region.

This short AI generated video is available in different languages:
French, Arabic, Spanish


May 15 EIR Roundtable: The Iran War and the ‘Controlled Disintegration’ of the World Economy


May 15 at 11:00 a.m. ET

Online via Zoom and live-streamed over YouTube

Simultaneous interpretation into Spanish, French, and German will be available on Zoom.


Speakers

Session A (Moderator: Dennis Speed)

  • Helga Zepp-LaRouche (Germany): Editor-in-chief, Executive Intelligence Review
  • H.E. Abolfazl Pasandideh (Iran): Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran to Mexico
  • Prof. Richard Falk (U.S.): professor emeritus of International Law and Practice at Princeton University
  • Sanjay Tripathi (India): FIETE, M.Tech (Computer Sc.), MBA (Fin.), former gov’t official, served in Ministry, presently part of various global organizations.
  • Prof. Lier Pires Ferreira (Brazil): Researcher, BRICS Center (Núcleo BRICS – NuBRICS), Fluminense Federal University, Niterói
  • Dialogue among the panelists

Session B (Moderator: Dennis Speed)

  • Dennis Small (U.S.): EIR Ibero-American Editor
  • H.E. Donald Ramotar (Guyana); former President of Guyana
  • David Hundeyin (Nigeria): investigative journalist, founder, The Spearhead
  • Frank Bornschein (Germany): City Council, Schwedt
  • Dialogue among the panelists

It is now two and a half months since the Feb. 28 closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a predictable—some would argue intended—result of the unprovoked U.S.-Israeli war of aggression against Iran. If this war continues for another few months, it is likely that the world economy will enter into a spiral of collapse leading into a full-scale global depression, including skyrocketing poverty, hunger, industrial collapse, and population dislocation and forced migration—as well as a guaranteed hyperinflationary blowout of the entire $2.4 quadrillion global financial bubble.

It will make the Great Depression of the 1930s pale in comparison. The closest parallel will be with the New Dark Age of the 14th century, with its notorious Black Death that wiped out up to half of the population of Europe.

This is because of the massive dislocation of the physical means of survival of billions of people that is well underway, triggered by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of world oil exports and 30% of the world supply of fertilizer formerly transited. This is already having devastating, non-linear effects:

• World Food Program Deputy Executive Director Carl Skau reported that “an extra 45 million people are projected to be pushed into acute hunger because of rises in food, oil and shipping costs, putting the global tally above its current record level of 319 million…. This would ‌take ⁠global hunger levels to an all-time record and it’s a terrible, terrible prospect,” he said.

• Many impoverished nations in east Africa depend on imports of fertilizer for more than 85% of usage. It is estimated that a 10% reduction in fertilizer application will result in up to 25% less rice, corn and wheat there, with devastating human consequences.

• U.S. diesel prices—which is the lifeblood of American farming activity—have soared by more than 50% since the war began, with ripple effects throughout the economy.

• The German industrial economy is in free fall, as a result of the combined effect of the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline and now the shortages of gasoline, and especially jet fuel, as a result of the Iran war.

We emphasize physical economy because Man’s productive activity is actually a living process, as the renowned American physical economist Lyndon LaRouche proved scientifically. If one significant area of that process is destroyed, the entirety will tend to collapse in a nonlinear fashion. This is what some observers refer to, simplistically, as a “supply chain” effect.

The real financial cost of the war is also staggering—probably upwards of $4 trillion, according to EIR’s estimates. The Pentagon’s acting comptroller told Congress on April 29 that Operation Epic Fury had cost about $25 billion, but this covered only U.S. munitions and operations through Day 60, with damage to overseas bases explicitly excluded. When that is added in, along with Israeli military expenditures, the total rises to some $200 billion. There is also in the range of $1 trillion in physical damage across Iran and the Gulf states. The IMF’s April Regional Economic Outlook further estimates that as much as 2% of global GDP will also be wiped out by the war—implying $1.5-$2 trillion in lost global output for 2026 alone.

So, $4 trillion is probably on the low side of the real monetary cost of the war to date.

How many productive jobs could be provided if those funds were invested in infrastructure, agriculture and industry? How many bridges, ports and high-speed rail lines could be built? How many lives could be saved by increased investment in hospitals, schools, and essential pharmaceuticals?

Over a longer time period: The war kills hundreds of thousands directly and through cascading food and energy shocks; pushes hundreds of millions into hunger over the next two to three years; and—through the destruction of productive capital and the diversion of $4 trillion from development to destruction and the rebuilding of what once was—could reduce the planet’s mid-century potential population by something on the order of a half-billion to a billion. The war’s most consequential casualties may be people who, had it never been started, would have been born into a more productive global economy and were not.

All of this is clearly unnecessary—but is it also an intentional policy of Malthusian depopulation being implemented by the international financial establishment centered in the City of London and Wall Street? In the mid-1970s, the New York Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)—to this day the premier U.S. Establishment’s foreign policy think-tank and sister organization of Britain’s Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA/Chatham House)—published a voluminous study, Project 1980s, which explicitly called for the “controlled disintegration” of the world economy as a means of maintaining their slipping political control. In November 1978, then Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker delivered a speech in England pronouncing that “a controlled disintegration in the world economy is a legitimate object for the 1980s”—and Volcker then proceeded to raise U.S. interest rates to the deadly level of 21.5% in December 1980.

The true economic cost of the Iran war—and the alternative policies to build a new security and development architecture for the world—will be the central topic explored by highly qualified experts at the May 15 EIR Emergency Roundtable Dialogue.


International Peace Coalition, Week 152: The Emperor Without Clothes

May 1, 2026 (EIRNS)—The 152nd consecutive weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) on Friday, May 1, began with an update from coalition initiator and Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche. “We are seeing day by day what in the history books probably will be reported as the destruction of the presidency of U.S. President Donald Trump,” she said. Not one of the Iran war aims has been reached. “The status of the United States as the unipolar world power, claiming that they can keep control over the world … that is the emperor without clothes in front of the eyes of the whole world.” Moving on to the April 27-30 visit to the United States by the United Kingdom’s King Charles III, she said, “King Charles … tried to deny the importance of the American Revolution altogether. I mean, the American Revolution was the first anti-imperial revolution.” Trump attempted to negate its significance when he called it the “Anglo-American Revolution.”

Ray McGovern, former CIA analyst, co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), reported that Trump says Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni insults Jesus; her responses were polemical, including: “Do you know what insults Jesus? Bombing innocent schools in Iran and sending our brave men and women to die in another endless war, hiding the Epstein files and then refusing to prosecute anyone involved.”

He went on to say that “The President of Russia [Vladimir Putin] pointed out that if the United States and Israel resume military action, this would inevitably lead to an extremely adverse consequence, not only for Iran, but for Iranʼs neighbors…. Putin stressed that a ground operation on Iranian territory would be particularly unacceptable and dangerous.”

Richard Falk, professor emeritus of international law at Princeton University, and former UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories from 2008 to 2014, addressed the April 27-30 U.S. visit of King Charles, saying: “Trump himself envisions his ultimate identity to be the first American king. And in that sense, he’s trying to emulate the externality of what it means to be a dynastic leader, who has no respect for restraints other than his own internal will and moral priorities…. And it is ironic, of course, that it comes at the [250th] anniversary of the American Revolution. And itʼs the most perverse celebration of that revolution, then one could dream up.” He described the United States as “an empire in decline,” that was only able to use its mammoth military to intimidate the rest of the world. “And this brings us to this abyss that frightens our main supposed rivals, Russia and China, the adults in the room that are trying to bring a kind of rationality back into the practice of geopolitics.”

Zepp-LaRouche responded, “According to the monarchy theory, these people are good by nature, by Godʼs creation, while the normal people are evil, and therefore you need a ‘Leviathan’ strong state to suppress their evil…. [P]eople should not be blinded by the pomp and luxury, but what is underlying this idea is fundamentally this disrespect for the sacredness of every human life.”

Garland Nixon, veteran progressive radio and television talk show host, compared the U.S. Congress’ adulation for King Charles to the similar way they responded to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He reminded the participants that Israel was created as a British imperial project, and that when people assert that Israel is controlling the United States, that simply means that the British, by extension, are still controlling us. After the Democrat-sponsored “No Kings” rallies, he observed: “thereʼs the king, and they just fall down worshipping, you know, at the altar of the king. Thereʼs a great irony there. And again, and they treated Netanyahu like a king.”

He addressed the question of whether we have a real democracy; we are allowed to vote, but the elected officials routinely do the opposite of what they had promised the voters. He urged that voters “not be naive enough [to think] that we can go to the wolf and lobby for the wolf to become a vegetarian.”

Falk added: “I found very disappointing in a way, the ‘No Kings’ protests activities, first because they were preoccupied with what injustices were occurring in the U.S. without understanding or comprehending the harm that we were doing to the rest of the world. And the demonic impact we were having on the history of our times.”

Historian Lynne Speed of the Schiller Institute also condemned that adulation shown to King Charles: “The acquiescence to this perversion by the President, the Congress, and many of the American people demonstrate the enormity of the problem and the work we have to do.” She described research she had done into the true nature of the American Revolution: “The participants in the revolution were far more diverse and colorful than what is generally thought or taught. In a sense, theyʼre very much like America and the world today. These people were Black, free and enslaved, White, abolitionists and slave owners, Native Americans, rich and poor, and from every ethnic group and religious persuasion. And they hailed from many nations around the world.” She shared images from a calendar she has prepared to commemorate the 250th anniversary of independence.

Diane Sare, U.S. independent presidential candidate, discussed the exemplary role of Alexander Hamilton: “[H]is conception of economy very much … presages that of Lyndon LaRouche, that itʼs not money, itʼs credit, itʼs about the future, and itʼs about creating a multiplicity of ideas and labor so that you need an ever-growing workforce with particular skills, and that all of the unique talents and capability of your workforce can be brought to bear.” She went on to cite President George Washington’s farewell address:

“But as it is easy to foresee, that from different causes & from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed, to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth; as this is the point in your political fortress against which the batteries of internal and external enemies will be most constantly and actively (though often covertly & insidiously) directed….”

Discussion

In response to a question, Sare said, “[W]hile itʼs true that there were many nefarious activities undertaken by the government of the United States, we seem to be under a kind of umbrella group, which weʼve loosely identified as the Epstein class, but it really is a group of billionaires, and somehow they seem to control … as my friend Doug Macgregor talks about, the CIA, the Mossad, and the MI6 really function as one agency, one entity. So, I think the question is how can we liberate mankind from this and actually get back to having governments of nations.” She described her lobbying activity in the U.S. Congress, saying, “[T]he staffers whom we met with were quite … affected by seeing that people around the world are watching the United States, and know enough about our form of government that theyʼre not going to be fooled and merely blame the President when you have a body which is elected to represent the American people, which has the power to do something about this.”

There was a wide-ranging discussion on the nature of government, the difference between a democracy and republic, and whether the Magna Carta was really a forerunner of the Declaration of Independence, as is sometimes claimed, or it simply codified power-sharing between the king and the oligarchy. Helga Zepp-LaRouche referenced 15th-century Catholic Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa, who put forward the notion of the “consent of the governed.” Speed noted that Britain still does not have a written constitution, and the oft-referenced “pursuit of happiness” has nothing to do with pleasure: It is the right of the individual to do good, as discussed by Cotton Mather. Zepp-LaRouche warned that apart from the dumbing down of the population, digitalization and AI create new avenues of manipulation. [eir]


Interview with Dennis Fritz, Retired Air Force Chief — Why the U.S. Keeps Going to War (And Who Benefits)

This in-depth interview explores the escalating crisis in Iran and the broader geopolitical strategy behind ongoing conflicts in Southwest Asia. Featuring retired U.S. Air Force Command Chief Master Sergeant Dennis Fritz, the discussion challenges official narratives surrounding U.S. foreign policy, revisits the origins and consequences of the Iraq War, and examines claims about long-term strategic planning in the region. The video raises urgent questions about government transparency, the risk of wider war—including potential nuclear escalation—and the role of global power structures shaping current events.


Page 1 of 149123...Last