Top Left Link Buttons

General

Category Archives

The Confluence of Science and Faith

Report on IPC #155

May 22, 2026 (EIRNS)—The 155th consecutive weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) began with comments by coalition initiator and Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche. She announced that the immediate target of the IPC’s mobilization will be the special open debate of the UN Security Council which will be held on May 26, with the theme of “Upholding the Purposes and Principles of the UN Charter and Strengthening the UN-centered International System,” to be chaired personally by Foreign Minister Wang Yi of China, this month’s UNSC rotating chair.

She reviewed the proposals which came out of last week’s EIR roundtable discussion, and added that it was heartening that more proposals, such as the Africa 2063 plan, are emerging that complement her proposals and those which have been presented at IPC meetings.

Zepp-LaRouche has composed a special letter addressed to the UNSC session “What we are interested in is to be putting on the table an entirely different approach,” she said, not the usual geopolitics, but “long term survivability of the region and all the countries involved.” The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) warned this week that, due to resource shortages which are a consequence of the Iran war, on top of the ongoing economic financial breakdown, we are already in the initial stages of a “food price shock,” potentially leading to famines. She warned that those who planned the war anticipated such an outcome; “There are all these crazy Malthusian ideas in the background,” including the policy of so-called “controlled disintegration.”

Science and Religion

Dr. Abdullah Ahsan of Pakistan, Professor of Comparative Civilization at Istanbul Şehir University in Türkiye, identified three stages of a solution to the present crisis. In the short term, there would be former Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu’s proposal for a neutral third party—he proposed Pakistan, Indonesia, Türkiye and Malaysia—to manage the Strait of Hormuz, because the United States and Iran have reached a total deadlock and the entire world has become “victim of this Hormuz situation.” In the middle term, we must revive the concept of a Dialogue of Civilizations, which has been advocated in various forms by various parties, including the Schiller Institute and the government of Iran. In the long term, we must address the view that there is a conflict between science and religion. Modern secularism, Dr. Ahsan asserted, stems from the ideas of German philosopher Immanuel Kant. Ahsan’s studies, however, “suggest that all civilizations in history are rooted in divine guidance.” He cited the subject of evolution, where science and faith appear to diverge.

Later in the discussion, co-moderator Dennis Small posed a solution to the apparent conflict. Man has the capability to creatively modify the physical universe, which is a demonstration of free will and thereby moral capability, and represents a so-called “metaphysical” dimension in what most consider physics, the existence of which refutes the theories of Kant. He cited LaRouche’s Oasis Plan as an example of a creative idea impacting the physical universe.

Still later, Helga Zepp-LaRouche weighed in on this topic. She contrasted the dogmatic vs. the philosophical view in religion. Saint Augustine pointed out that Plato had earlier arrived at similar conclusions to those of Jesus Christ, demonstrating that there is no contradiction between faith and knowledge. Fifteenth-Century Catholic Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa said that evolution takes place through the “lifting” of the lower domain by the more developed organizing principle of the higher domain, and Zepp-LaRouche went on to describe how the Russian/Ukrainian scientist Vladimir Vernadsky arrived at the same conclusion with his conception of the Noösphere. This idea is also reflected in the book of Genesis, where Man is said to be imago viva Dei, in the living image of God, because of his capacity for creativity.

The Worsening Crisis in Agriculture

Jesus Holguin Cazares, President of the Kansas Cattlemen’s Association, reported that the costs of chemicals necessary for agriculture have gone up dramatically due to the Iran war. This places an extraordinary and unsustainable burden on smaller, independent producers. In addition, the cartelization of agriculture poses a threat to smaller producers who cannot compete with enormous agribusinesses, and this translates to higher prices for consumers. Corporations are buying up distressed farms, leading to further cartelization.

Jon Baker, Vice President of the Iowa Stockgrowers Association also reported on the crisis in farming and ranching, which he said was getting much worse as a result of the Iran War, for example, with its effect on pushing up prices for diesel, essential for agriculture. He also took aim at the predations of speculators and agribusiness. Baker gave the example of his own operation, which lost $80,000 in value over the past two days, just due to so-called “market factors.” The mega agro-cartels are increasing their concentration, while independent farm operations decrease.

Dennis Small followed Holguin with a report from the National Front to Save the Mexican Countryside, which just held a 3,500-person demonstration in Mexico City and met with the country’s Agriculture Minister to discuss policy solutions to the crisis. The Front calls for an agriculture policy in Mexico which prioritizes feeding the population rather than coddling the speculators of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and the destructive neo-liberal economic policies such as those associated with Ludwig von Mises of the Austrian School. They are calling for Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum to change policy, but they are not joining the efforts of U.S. speculators and the U.S. President Donald Trump administration to undermine and destabilize her government.

Independent U.S. congressional candidate in New York’s 15th congressional district (The Bronx) Jose Vega offered a report on the progress of his campaign, and commented on how essential it is for American citizens to take up the profound ideas discussed at the IPC meetings. He led a rally at the United Nations yesterday to shape the discussion at the May 26 UN Security Council special session.

Discussion: Fighting the Oligarchy

Zepp-LaRouche elaborated on the various facets of the drive for war being promoted by the leading “Western” faction, emphasizing that “unilateral sanctions are a form of war,” and expressed the hope that these conflicts can be resolved with a new international security and development architecture. In response to a question, she called for global support for Cuba, a major victim of U.S. sanctions, particularly in light of Cuba’s benevolent role in assisting other nations with medical support. Zepp-LaRouche observed that the “Davos men,” AKA the Epstein Class or “the super class of the dead souls,” are interested in perpetuating the crises for the purposes of advancing their geopolitical agendas.

Dr. Ahsan raised the question of how to end oligarchic control over politics, and offered the example of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, which exerts economic pressure on the Israeli regime, as a small step in the right direction.

In conclusion, Zepp-LaRouche reiterated her warnings that both the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the wars initiated by Israel in Southwest Asia, are potential flashpoints for nuclear war. Co-moderator Dennis Speed noted that next week’s meeting will mark the 156th-consecutive weekly meeting of the IPC, the three-year anniversary of its founding. The sort of persistence demonstrated by the IPC in carrying on these meetings will be important in building the grass-roots machine required to change the policies of the United States and Europe. [eir]


To the Governments of the United Nations: A Policy to Bring Peace and Development to Southwest Asia

May 17, 2026

On May 26, China, as the rotating chair of the United Nations Security Council, will convene a meeting under the theme “Upholding the Purposes and Principles of the UN Charter and Strengthening the UN-Centered International System.” The meeting will occur with the world at a historical branching point, where humanity can choose to go in one of two very different directions. The unprovoked and aggressive war against Iran, and its ensuing effects, has placed the Middle East at an impasse and threatens a potentially fatal escalation into a global economic depression or even global nuclear war. At the same time, the meetings between President Xi Jinping and President Donald Trump in Beijing have opened the door to a new level of cooperation between the world’s two largest economies, creating an opportunity to implement an entirely different policy than that which created today’s crisis. Therefore, it is a very precious moment in history, which must not be missed.

Such a policy was actually discussed and elaborated at the recent EIR Emergency Roundtable on May 15, “The Iran War and the ‘Controlled Disintegration’ of the World Economy.” Speaking there was former Prime Minister of Türkiye Ahmet Davutoğlu, along with Iranian Ambassador to Mexico Abolfazl Pasandideh, former UN Special Rapporteur for Palestine Richard Falk, and others. Prof. Davutoğlu insisted that bilateral U.S.-Iran bargaining cannot resolve the regional crisis, saying only “a comprehensive regional framework” can produce sustainable peace. He outlined his recent proposal consisting of four converging issues, where “progress on any one front is unlikely without parallel movement on the others”:

1. The Strait of Hormuz: Form a coalition of trusted intermediaries, such as Türkiye, Pakistan, Malaysia, and Indonesia, to administer the Strait under a UN Security Council mandate.

2. Nuclear arrangements: Establish a new agreement whereby Iran would deposit enriched uranium in Türkiye in exchange for fuel for civilian use, reaffirm its commitment not to pursue nuclear weapons, and have its right to peaceful nuclear energy formally recognized by the U.S. Over time, the region would move toward freedom from nuclear weapons “including those held by Israel.” (It should be noted that this was the basis for the 2010 Tehran Agreement, which Davutoğlu helped mediate, along with Brazil and the IAEA, and which was rejected by President Obama at the time. Notably, President Lula of Brazil handed President Trump a copy of this agreement during his recent May 7 visit to Washington.)

3. Regional security architecture: A multilayered structure of confidence-building and regional security would be established, evolving toward “a Middle Eastern equivalent of the 1975 Helsinki Accords.”

4. Palestine: Israel would be offered integration into the architecture—full diplomatic normalization and formal guarantees—in exchange for recognizing Palestinian statehood and ending military operations in Lebanon.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute and Editor-in-Chief of EIR magazine, had opened the roundtable dialogue by proposing a complete policy change for Southwest Asia, namely that the nations of the entire region, from India to the Mediterranean, from the Caucasus to the Gulf, adopt a joint policy of “Peace through Development.” An integrated “Extended Oasis Plan,” in which a program for reversing the desertification of Southwest Asia, modelled on China’s transformation of Xinjiang province and its northwest deserts, is combined with the extension of development corridors throughout Southwest Asia. As in the times of the ancient Silk Road, the Middle East can become the hub connecting Asia, Africa and Europe again, with a bright future for all countries which are now in a state of humanitarian crisis and poverty as a result of interventionist wars.

When Zepp-LaRouche proposed to add the Extended Oasis Plan to the proposal put on the table by Davutoğlu, which is actually very similar to the Tehran Agreement of 2010 signed by Türkiye, Brazil and Iran, the latter replied:

“I fully agree. The best way of peace is economic interdependency. There is no other way. You can sign peace plans, you can make many declarations, but the best way of peace is economic interdependency. Whenever you have economic interdependency, nobody will be starting a war. So, economic interdependency means development.” Davutoğlu added that the best response to this war is to create a sense of “regional belonging, supporting each other. And I fully share your opinion; and we can bring these proposals together, a geopolitical solution framework, as well as a developmental, visionary project together.”

The participants in the EIR Roundtable agreed, therefore, to send this combined proposal to the governments convening the UN Security Council special session on May 26, requesting that it be taken into consideration at this meeting. Even as the UN Charter must be upheld, the UN is nevertheless in urgent need of reform, which would give the Global Majority a proportionate representation. Part of this reform must be the establishment of a new security and development architecture, which must take into account the interest of every single country on the planet.

A combination of Mr. Davutoğlu’s proposal and the Extended Oasis Plan can be an indispensable component of such a new architecture.

Any and all of the participants in the EIR roundtable stand prepared for further assistance, if so required.

Sincerely yours,

Helga Zepp-LaRouche
Founder, Schiller Institute
Editor-in-Chief, EIR
May 17, 2026


Resources




Create Peace Where War Divides: LaRouche’s Oasis Plan

Build nuclear power plants for desalination, new transportation corridors, new ports—create a future for the next fifty years! That’s the only way to put together an idea of a common interest for everyone in the region.

This short AI generated video is available in different languages:
French, Arabic, Spanish


May 15 EIR Roundtable: The Iran War and the ‘Controlled Disintegration’ of the World Economy


May 15 at 11:00 a.m. ET

Online via Zoom and live-streamed over YouTube

Simultaneous interpretation into Spanish, French, and German will be available on Zoom.


Speakers

Session A (Moderator: Dennis Speed)

  • Helga Zepp-LaRouche (Germany): Editor-in-chief, Executive Intelligence Review
  • H.E. Abolfazl Pasandideh (Iran): Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran to Mexico
  • Prof. Richard Falk (U.S.): professor emeritus of International Law and Practice at Princeton University
  • Sanjay Tripathi (India): FIETE, M.Tech (Computer Sc.), MBA (Fin.), former gov’t official, served in Ministry, presently part of various global organizations.
  • Prof. Lier Pires Ferreira (Brazil): Researcher, BRICS Center (Núcleo BRICS – NuBRICS), Fluminense Federal University, Niterói
  • Dialogue among the panelists

Session B (Moderator: Dennis Speed)

  • Dennis Small (U.S.): EIR Ibero-American Editor
  • H.E. Donald Ramotar (Guyana); former President of Guyana
  • David Hundeyin (Nigeria): investigative journalist, founder, The Spearhead
  • Frank Bornschein (Germany): City Council, Schwedt
  • Dialogue among the panelists

It is now two and a half months since the Feb. 28 closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a predictable—some would argue intended—result of the unprovoked U.S.-Israeli war of aggression against Iran. If this war continues for another few months, it is likely that the world economy will enter into a spiral of collapse leading into a full-scale global depression, including skyrocketing poverty, hunger, industrial collapse, and population dislocation and forced migration—as well as a guaranteed hyperinflationary blowout of the entire $2.4 quadrillion global financial bubble.

It will make the Great Depression of the 1930s pale in comparison. The closest parallel will be with the New Dark Age of the 14th century, with its notorious Black Death that wiped out up to half of the population of Europe.

This is because of the massive dislocation of the physical means of survival of billions of people that is well underway, triggered by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of world oil exports and 30% of the world supply of fertilizer formerly transited. This is already having devastating, non-linear effects:

• World Food Program Deputy Executive Director Carl Skau reported that “an extra 45 million people are projected to be pushed into acute hunger because of rises in food, oil and shipping costs, putting the global tally above its current record level of 319 million…. This would ‌take ⁠global hunger levels to an all-time record and it’s a terrible, terrible prospect,” he said.

• Many impoverished nations in east Africa depend on imports of fertilizer for more than 85% of usage. It is estimated that a 10% reduction in fertilizer application will result in up to 25% less rice, corn and wheat there, with devastating human consequences.

• U.S. diesel prices—which is the lifeblood of American farming activity—have soared by more than 50% since the war began, with ripple effects throughout the economy.

• The German industrial economy is in free fall, as a result of the combined effect of the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipeline and now the shortages of gasoline, and especially jet fuel, as a result of the Iran war.

We emphasize physical economy because Man’s productive activity is actually a living process, as the renowned American physical economist Lyndon LaRouche proved scientifically. If one significant area of that process is destroyed, the entirety will tend to collapse in a nonlinear fashion. This is what some observers refer to, simplistically, as a “supply chain” effect.

The real financial cost of the war is also staggering—probably upwards of $4 trillion, according to EIR’s estimates. The Pentagon’s acting comptroller told Congress on April 29 that Operation Epic Fury had cost about $25 billion, but this covered only U.S. munitions and operations through Day 60, with damage to overseas bases explicitly excluded. When that is added in, along with Israeli military expenditures, the total rises to some $200 billion. There is also in the range of $1 trillion in physical damage across Iran and the Gulf states. The IMF’s April Regional Economic Outlook further estimates that as much as 2% of global GDP will also be wiped out by the war—implying $1.5-$2 trillion in lost global output for 2026 alone.

So, $4 trillion is probably on the low side of the real monetary cost of the war to date.

How many productive jobs could be provided if those funds were invested in infrastructure, agriculture and industry? How many bridges, ports and high-speed rail lines could be built? How many lives could be saved by increased investment in hospitals, schools, and essential pharmaceuticals?

Over a longer time period: The war kills hundreds of thousands directly and through cascading food and energy shocks; pushes hundreds of millions into hunger over the next two to three years; and—through the destruction of productive capital and the diversion of $4 trillion from development to destruction and the rebuilding of what once was—could reduce the planet’s mid-century potential population by something on the order of a half-billion to a billion. The war’s most consequential casualties may be people who, had it never been started, would have been born into a more productive global economy and were not.

All of this is clearly unnecessary—but is it also an intentional policy of Malthusian depopulation being implemented by the international financial establishment centered in the City of London and Wall Street? In the mid-1970s, the New York Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)—to this day the premier U.S. Establishment’s foreign policy think-tank and sister organization of Britain’s Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA/Chatham House)—published a voluminous study, Project 1980s, which explicitly called for the “controlled disintegration” of the world economy as a means of maintaining their slipping political control. In November 1978, then Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker delivered a speech in England pronouncing that “a controlled disintegration in the world economy is a legitimate object for the 1980s”—and Volcker then proceeded to raise U.S. interest rates to the deadly level of 21.5% in December 1980.

The true economic cost of the Iran war—and the alternative policies to build a new security and development architecture for the world—will be the central topic explored by highly qualified experts at the May 15 EIR Emergency Roundtable Dialogue.


International Peace Coalition, Week 152: The Emperor Without Clothes

May 1, 2026 (EIRNS)—The 152nd consecutive weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) on Friday, May 1, began with an update from coalition initiator and Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche. “We are seeing day by day what in the history books probably will be reported as the destruction of the presidency of U.S. President Donald Trump,” she said. Not one of the Iran war aims has been reached. “The status of the United States as the unipolar world power, claiming that they can keep control over the world … that is the emperor without clothes in front of the eyes of the whole world.” Moving on to the April 27-30 visit to the United States by the United Kingdom’s King Charles III, she said, “King Charles … tried to deny the importance of the American Revolution altogether. I mean, the American Revolution was the first anti-imperial revolution.” Trump attempted to negate its significance when he called it the “Anglo-American Revolution.”

Ray McGovern, former CIA analyst, co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), reported that Trump says Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni insults Jesus; her responses were polemical, including: “Do you know what insults Jesus? Bombing innocent schools in Iran and sending our brave men and women to die in another endless war, hiding the Epstein files and then refusing to prosecute anyone involved.”

He went on to say that “The President of Russia [Vladimir Putin] pointed out that if the United States and Israel resume military action, this would inevitably lead to an extremely adverse consequence, not only for Iran, but for Iranʼs neighbors…. Putin stressed that a ground operation on Iranian territory would be particularly unacceptable and dangerous.”

Richard Falk, professor emeritus of international law at Princeton University, and former UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories from 2008 to 2014, addressed the April 27-30 U.S. visit of King Charles, saying: “Trump himself envisions his ultimate identity to be the first American king. And in that sense, he’s trying to emulate the externality of what it means to be a dynastic leader, who has no respect for restraints other than his own internal will and moral priorities…. And it is ironic, of course, that it comes at the [250th] anniversary of the American Revolution. And itʼs the most perverse celebration of that revolution, then one could dream up.” He described the United States as “an empire in decline,” that was only able to use its mammoth military to intimidate the rest of the world. “And this brings us to this abyss that frightens our main supposed rivals, Russia and China, the adults in the room that are trying to bring a kind of rationality back into the practice of geopolitics.”

Zepp-LaRouche responded, “According to the monarchy theory, these people are good by nature, by Godʼs creation, while the normal people are evil, and therefore you need a ‘Leviathan’ strong state to suppress their evil…. [P]eople should not be blinded by the pomp and luxury, but what is underlying this idea is fundamentally this disrespect for the sacredness of every human life.”

Garland Nixon, veteran progressive radio and television talk show host, compared the U.S. Congress’ adulation for King Charles to the similar way they responded to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He reminded the participants that Israel was created as a British imperial project, and that when people assert that Israel is controlling the United States, that simply means that the British, by extension, are still controlling us. After the Democrat-sponsored “No Kings” rallies, he observed: “thereʼs the king, and they just fall down worshipping, you know, at the altar of the king. Thereʼs a great irony there. And again, and they treated Netanyahu like a king.”

He addressed the question of whether we have a real democracy; we are allowed to vote, but the elected officials routinely do the opposite of what they had promised the voters. He urged that voters “not be naive enough [to think] that we can go to the wolf and lobby for the wolf to become a vegetarian.”

Falk added: “I found very disappointing in a way, the ‘No Kings’ protests activities, first because they were preoccupied with what injustices were occurring in the U.S. without understanding or comprehending the harm that we were doing to the rest of the world. And the demonic impact we were having on the history of our times.”

Historian Lynne Speed of the Schiller Institute also condemned that adulation shown to King Charles: “The acquiescence to this perversion by the President, the Congress, and many of the American people demonstrate the enormity of the problem and the work we have to do.” She described research she had done into the true nature of the American Revolution: “The participants in the revolution were far more diverse and colorful than what is generally thought or taught. In a sense, theyʼre very much like America and the world today. These people were Black, free and enslaved, White, abolitionists and slave owners, Native Americans, rich and poor, and from every ethnic group and religious persuasion. And they hailed from many nations around the world.” She shared images from a calendar she has prepared to commemorate the 250th anniversary of independence.

Diane Sare, U.S. independent presidential candidate, discussed the exemplary role of Alexander Hamilton: “[H]is conception of economy very much … presages that of Lyndon LaRouche, that itʼs not money, itʼs credit, itʼs about the future, and itʼs about creating a multiplicity of ideas and labor so that you need an ever-growing workforce with particular skills, and that all of the unique talents and capability of your workforce can be brought to bear.” She went on to cite President George Washington’s farewell address:

“But as it is easy to foresee, that from different causes & from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed, to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth; as this is the point in your political fortress against which the batteries of internal and external enemies will be most constantly and actively (though often covertly & insidiously) directed….”

Discussion

In response to a question, Sare said, “[W]hile itʼs true that there were many nefarious activities undertaken by the government of the United States, we seem to be under a kind of umbrella group, which weʼve loosely identified as the Epstein class, but it really is a group of billionaires, and somehow they seem to control … as my friend Doug Macgregor talks about, the CIA, the Mossad, and the MI6 really function as one agency, one entity. So, I think the question is how can we liberate mankind from this and actually get back to having governments of nations.” She described her lobbying activity in the U.S. Congress, saying, “[T]he staffers whom we met with were quite … affected by seeing that people around the world are watching the United States, and know enough about our form of government that theyʼre not going to be fooled and merely blame the President when you have a body which is elected to represent the American people, which has the power to do something about this.”

There was a wide-ranging discussion on the nature of government, the difference between a democracy and republic, and whether the Magna Carta was really a forerunner of the Declaration of Independence, as is sometimes claimed, or it simply codified power-sharing between the king and the oligarchy. Helga Zepp-LaRouche referenced 15th-century Catholic Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa, who put forward the notion of the “consent of the governed.” Speed noted that Britain still does not have a written constitution, and the oft-referenced “pursuit of happiness” has nothing to do with pleasure: It is the right of the individual to do good, as discussed by Cotton Mather. Zepp-LaRouche warned that apart from the dumbing down of the population, digitalization and AI create new avenues of manipulation. [eir]


Interview with Dennis Fritz, Retired Air Force Chief — Why the U.S. Keeps Going to War (And Who Benefits)

This in-depth interview explores the escalating crisis in Iran and the broader geopolitical strategy behind ongoing conflicts in Southwest Asia. Featuring retired U.S. Air Force Command Chief Master Sergeant Dennis Fritz, the discussion challenges official narratives surrounding U.S. foreign policy, revisits the origins and consequences of the Iraq War, and examines claims about long-term strategic planning in the region. The video raises urgent questions about government transparency, the risk of wider war—including potential nuclear escalation—and the role of global power structures shaping current events.


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche:Trump Rolls Out the Red Carpet for the British Malthusian King.

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.
Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, April 29 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

Take a step back from the rush of the day’s events, and the fact that the old order has collapsed is dramatically evident. The Western casino economics system is cracking up with debt, crypto, and non-production. The Western military system—whether Global NATO or unilateral U.S. or EU—is exposed as dead-head bellicosity. The Western political and cultural system is seen as an Epstein Class horror show. Emblematic is this week’s trip by the British King and Queen to the United States during the U.S. 250th anniversary of America defeating the British Empire. The spectacle began today with music, flags and red carpet on the tarmac at Air Force Base Andrews, followed by a tea party in town.

The LaRouche Organization has released a statement for Washington, D.C. and international circulation: “The British Are Back To Finish the War of 1812— This Time by Invitation” ,or, “LaRouche Was Right!”

The statement reads: … “Who invited the British Royals to address a joint session of the U.S. Congress on the 250th anniversary of the American Declaration of Independence? Formally speaking, the invitation was issued appropriately enough on April Fool’s Day, 2026, by the following fools: Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. But as we’ve seen on too many occasions, it doesn’t seem to be the members of Congress calling the shots, but rather their big-money Epstein-class owners.

American economist and eight-time presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche was famous for his identification of the British Empire as the source of most of the evil on the planet, particularly since British Lord Bertrand Russell took over science at the turn of the 20th century.

This assessment has not been unique to LaRouche: In 1776 it was the subject of the American Declaration of Independence, which includes a long list of grievances (crimes) committed by the British against the American colonists. The British never apologized for these abuses, but went on to attempt to burn down Washington in 1812, and to promote the slave trade and the Confederacy during the misnamed “Civil War.”

After the United States became an independent republic, the British were also involved in a series of assassinations of American presidents, as documented in a report commissioned by Lyndon LaRouche and written by historian Anton Chaitkin: “Why the British Kill American Presidents.” While the British have never offered reparations for their crimes, it is to be noted that God sent Queen Elizabeth II to hell on the 100th anniversary of Lyndon LaRouche’s birth, September 8, 2022 (and thus bringing her son Charles to the throne). …”

Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Schiller Institute founder and leader, emphatically made the observation today that “the collapse of the old order is undeniable.” This means that, “it is no longer utopian” to mobilize for a new system. “We must have a new order.”

The extreme danger if this change of direction does not come about is seen in the insanity of certain European nations squaring off against Russia, a nuclear power. German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius issued a statement April 22 about the military strategy of the German armed forces, stressing that Russia poses an acute threat to Germany, and hence a massive mobilization for re-armament is necessary. He proclaimed, “We are developing the Bundeswehr into the strongest conventional army in Europe,” and went into short-, medium- and long-term goals for superiority. The prospects for the German economy to succeed in doing this are delusionary, but the intent itself is madness.

Join the mobilization of the LaRouche Movement, join the 152nd meeting of the International Peace Coalition this coming Friday.


‘Let’s Get Real.’

International Peace Coalition, Report on #151

by EIR staff

April 24—The International Peace Coalition (IPC) commenced its 151st consecutive weekly online meeting with an overview by Schiller Institute founder and IPC initiator Helga Zepp-LaRouche, who noted that the Chinese government has called upon its citizens to leave Iran, which may mean that they have information on the immanent resumption of the war with United States and Israel. The continuous two month blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which has been caused by this unprovoked war of aggression against Iran, has put the world in acute danger of falling into an economic depression with incredible social consequences. There are already severe shortages of oil, energy prices are increasing, and shortages of fertilizer are endangering the world’s food supply.

Zepp-LaRouche said that there is an urgent need to establish a New International Security and Development Architecture which takes account of the interests of all nations. Although that idea had been dismissed by many in the past, she said, now that the world is collapsing that idea is gaining resonance and people are beginning to ask how international relations among nations can be reestablished based upon principles. The only institution which has called for a such a principled return to international law, other than the Schiller Institute and the IPC, is the government of China which has put forward its four global initiatives, in particular its Global Governance Initiative, which is a framework of how to rearrange international relations based on the UN Charter and the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence.

Other consequences of the collapse of the present system include the Persian Gulf states, which had a business model where they relied on the presence of American bases to guarantee their security, but as it turns out, the United States only protects Israel. These countries are now in a very difficult position, she said, feeling the economic effects of the war. There is an urgent need to discuss: what do we do with this region of Southwest Asia when the war ends? Zepp-LaRouche said that for this reason, the Schiller Institute has put forward an Extended Oasis Plan for the region; the creation of large amounts of new fresh water with nuclear desalination of ocean water brought in by canals; the building of economic development corridors extending from India to the Mediterranean, from the Caucuses to the Persian Gulf.

Pope Leo XIV’s trip to Africa has been a very significant development, she said. In the United States, support for President Donald Trump is rapidly declining, even among his MAGA base. Since the U.S. Congress abdicated the right to declare war, “it is their urgent responsibility to take it back.”

María de los Ángeles Huerta del Río, former Congresswoman from Mexico, warned that most important wars of the 21st Century are fought not with drones and missiles, but with algorithms and the battlefield is the human mind. This is called “hybrid warfare.” Ultraconservative think tanks like the Atlas Network are linked with Silicon Valley tech giants and legions of propaganda influencers. Latin America has become a testing ground for these techniques. We need instead to make it into a zone of “cognitive peace.”  She proposed that the nations of this region reassert the role of national media to combat propaganda, and that they join forces in these endeavors in a “South-South” alliance to stand up to the power of the global media giants, an alliance for “cognitive sovereignty and digital justice.”

Dennis Fritz, U.S. Air Force Command Chief Master Sergeant (ret.) and current Senior Fellow at the Eisenhower Media Network, spoke as a military man who has seen the inner workings of the Pentagon. He said that he has been warning about the Iran war which is happening right now for decades. “How did I know it was coming? I saw the plan” and it goes back to 1992. Retired U.S. four-star General Wesley Clark revealed that after the September 11, 2001 terror attacks he was told by a Pentagon general of the plan for the United States to take out seven countries within five years. “We are the cause of the majority of the problems around the world,” Fritz said. We claim to stand for democracy and freedom, but we destroy those things around the world. We started a war in Ukraine, at the expense of Ukraine, to weaken Russia. The entire world is being held hostage to an economic disaster, due to a war that we started in Iran. We are currently blockading Cuba, starving women and children. The huge sums of money we spend on war could have enormous benefits to the civilian economy.

Zepp-LaRouche responded that the idea of billionaires becoming trillionaires through war profiteering must become a topic of public debate.

Independent U.S. presidential candidate Diane Sare said that she has been in a fight to get the U.S. Congress to assume the responsibility for declaring war, as the Constitution requires in Article I, Section 8. We see partisan posturing; Democrats hope that the war continues so that Trump and the Republicans will be held responsible on election day. Sare and congressional candidate Jose Vega—who has qualified for ballot status as a Democrat and is now petitioning to also get on the ballot as an independent in New York’s 15th congressional district (the Bronx)— are pulling together a coalition of independent candidates across the United States. Regarding the physical economy, she said, “Let’s get real.” We used to understand the relationship between maintaining our infrastructure and meeting the needs of the population.

Mike Callicrate, Kansas cattle rancher and founder of Ranch Foods Direct, warned that we cannot feed ourselves currently, we have lost more than half our ranchers, and we import food from poor countries. “Global food policy should protect people, not predators.”

Jack Gilroy, of Veterans for Peace and Pax Christi, reported on a visit to Washington D.C., where 150 individuals from 5 or 6 different veterans’ organizations went into the U.S. Capitol Rotunda bearing red tulips for the people killed in Iran. Seventy U.S. veterans were arrested as they stood at parade rest.

Larry Johnson is a former CIA analyst and Deputy Director of the U.S. State Department’s Office of Counterterrorism from 1989 to 1993. He said that Trump is delusional about his accomplishments and shows lack of emotional control. This is particularly apparent in Trump’s attacks on his former supporters like American conservative commentator Tucker Carlson and former Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (from Georgia’s 14th Congressional District) who have become his critics. The petulant name-calling is what we might expect from a twelve-year-old. At the recent emergency meeting on Iran, Trump began to openly talk about using a nuclear weapon, according to multiple sources. Later in public statements he ruled out the use of nukes, and we hope that he remembers that he said that. Trump said that he is waiting for a specific proposal from Iran, when Iran’s ten-point plan proposal was sent ten days ago. The United States does not have enough ships to have a full blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, despite the claims that they are making.

Johnson said that neither the Iranians nor the Americans appreciate the global consequences of closing the Strait. Those consequences are beginning to be seen now. In particular, the disruption of supplies of urea for fertilizer will devastate world food production. People in our government who are responsible for anticipating and addressing this impending crisis are clueless.

Independent presidential candidate Diane Sare recalled that President Joe Biden was senile, but everyone pretended he was fine, as he pursued a policy of war and genocide. Now Trump continues Biden’s policies, and Trump is also losing his mind, while public figures pretend that his behavior is normal.

LaRouche Organization organizer Tim Rush reported on the activity of delegations of citizens who visited Congress on April 22, reaching roughly 40 offices of leading members of the House of Representatives to hand-deliver letters, both from their constituents, and from leaders of other nations, who emphasized that “it’s a question of world heritage that the founding principles of the United States must be revived.” Co-moderator Dennis Small read from a selection of these international letters, including from a 90-year-old nun in Barcelona, Spain. In response, Zepp-LaRouche sent special greetings to this nun, and called attention to the exemplary role of Spain in the current strategic situation. She said that she hoped that the people of Spain would “encourage the idea” of Spain being kicked out of NATO.

Discussion

Mike Callicrate stressed the importance of restoring a relationship between farmers and ranchers, and the communities in which they operate. Global agribusinesses have strangled food production and created food scarcity.

A participant asked, What if Iran were to reopen the Strait of Hormuz as a benevolent gesture, in the expectation of fairness. Is this thinkable? Zepp-LaRouche replied that the questioner should put herself in the shoes of Iranian leaders who have no reason to trust the United States or Israel, and they must look out for the safety and welfare of their citizens. Dennis Small reminded the meeting that it is actually the United States which is presently blocking the Strait.

A Spanish participant stressed the injustice of the U.S. siege of Cuba, a nation which has often demonstrated solidarity with other developing nations.

In concluding remarks, Zepp-LaRouche stated that the need to unite the international peace movement is more urgent than ever. She referred to the presentation by former Congresswoman María de los Ángeles Huerta del Río as being particularly important, since the issue of “narrative control” has emerged as central in the struggle for peace.


Schiller Institute and Chinese Think-Tank Hold Civilizational Dialogue in Berlin

Participants in dialogue at the Schiller Institute and Academy of Contemporary China and World Studies seminar in Berlin, April 15, 2026.

April 17—A highly successful seminar on “China-Europe Dialogue on Global Governance as well as Civilizational Exchange and Mutual Learning,” organized by the Schiller Institute and the Beijing-based Academy of Contemporary China and World Studies (ACCWS) was held in Berlin on April 15. Prominent speakers from Germany and China took the podium and engaged in a dialogue, articulated in two panels, moderated by Stephan Ossenkopp from the Schiller Institute and by Hu Yajuan from the ACCWS.

The event was opened by Gao Anming, editor of the China International Communications Group (CICG), Schiller Institute founder and leader Helga Zepp-LaRouche, and Ms. Yang Chengcheng, minister-counselor at the Chinese Embassy in Berlin.

Gao started his speech by referring to Friedrich Schiller’s Ode to Joy poem. He described the current world situation as characterized by “changes and tensions.” “Power politics poses the biggest challenge since World War II, and a China-Europe dialogue can be a factor of stability.” The construction of a true multilateralism to shape the future of humanity and reform the financial architecture is the task ahead of us. Gao emphasized the importance of the decision, incorporated in China’s 15th Five-Year Plan, to increase the “step-by-step opening” of the Chinese economy. He concluded his speech by calling for deepening reciprocal knowledge, as Leibniz had done 300 years ago.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche started with the positive note that the world has the chance to overcome 500 years of colonialism and should not take the ongoing epochal change as a threat. She chastised the Western attitude of looking at China with “augmented-reality spectacles,” not seeing the tremendous achievement China has made since 1971, when she first visited the country. She then went into the immediate task ahead, of solving conflicts, starting with Southwest Asia, where, if a nuclear war does not break out, there must be an “enlarged Oasis Plan” that includes Africa. The Schiller Institute has produced a report on the perspectives of a tripartite Europe-China-Africa development strategy that is consistent with Africa’s own 2063 Agenda. The second edition of the report is available in a few advanced copies. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s Global Governance Initiative also reflects principles laid out by the Schiller Institute’s own proposals. Not accidentally, the organization’s complete name is the “Schiller Institute, Association for Statecraft.”

Promising Perspectives of China-German Cooperation

Ms. Yang welcomed participants and outlined the promising perspectives of China-German cooperation. China’s economy grew 5% in the first quarter of 2026 and will further open itself to foreign investments, as it was stressed during German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s Feb. 25-26 visit. She mentioned that BASF had opened the world’s most modern chemical plant in China, as an example of the broad potential for cooperation between the world’s second- and third-largest economies.

The first panel, “Quality Opening as Engine of Global Governance,” was opened by ACCWS deputy director Fan Daqi, who briefly presented the result of a research paper by his institute. The paper shows the complementarity of the two economies and the perspective of cooperation in third state markets. He called for strengthening institutional guarantees. He was followed by Michael Bose, chairman of Automotive Berlin Brandenburg (ABB), who addressed the “complex interrelations” of the automobile industry. Comparing the German auto industry with the Chinese one today, he said, you must admit that the “teachers have become students.”

Shi Shiwei, director of the Research Center for German-Chinese Trade at China’s University of International Business and Economics, detailed the innovative sectors that are significant for Germany where investments should be directed according to the new Five-Year Plan.

Bernd Einmeier, chairman of the German-Chinese Society for Economy, Education and Culture, stated bluntly that “Germany has no idea of what China is.” He highlighted the high symbolism of the treatment given to Merz’s visit to China, as Chinese leaders agreed to receive him on the day of their most important traditional period, the New Year celebrations.

Oliver Lubich, sales manager at Hainan Airlines in Berlin, said that the potential for air traffic between the German capital and Hainan is much larger than the 55 flights currently established by treaty.

At the end of the panel, moderated by Ossenkopp, the speakers joined the podium for two rounds of questions. Importantly, Einmeier pointed to the different quality of teaching in Germany’s dual-purpose vocational schools, and proposed to integrate Germany’s and China’s educational methods. Director Shi criticized the EU 2030 strategy, which is “focused on only one thing,” namely decarbonization.

The second panel, “Civilizational Exchange and Mutual Learning,” was moderated by Hu Yajuan and was opened by Michael Müller, former mayor of Berlin and member of the Bundestag, the German parliament. Müller recalled how he had opposed the idea of “decoupling” from China when the issue was discussed in German political circles, and is happy that it has been rejected. “We should discuss not if, but how to develop cooperation,” he said. His experience as mayor tells him that a lot can be done with partnerships at the municipal level. Another field where cooperation can advance is science. The third issue is BRICS: it is a reality which one must face. Fourth, climate and demography. “There is not one single crisis which either we or China, alone, can solve.” Müller insisted that in a partnership, both parties must have the right also to address critical aspects.

Reason as a Precondition for Learning

Cord Eberspächer, a sinologist and historian at Bonn University, informed the audience that Confucius insisted that “the right content of terms” must be clarified before starting a dialogue. Another way to say this is “reason as precondition,” a curiosity for learning which was key in Leibniz’s fundamental work on China. Unfortunately, this does not occur today. Dialogue is meant differently in China and the West. The West believes that its idea of values is the right one, Eberspächer said in a veiled answer to Müller. So, when Germany sells cars to every country in the world it is called “successful export economy,” but when the Chinese do the same thing, it is called “overcapacity.”

Zhou Hengxiang, Germanist and author, addressed the issue of differences between the German and the Chinese system of law. He gave the example of how the German terms “person” and “man” (human being) are merged in one single term in the Chinese system, thus making it less “clean” to extend the legal term from human beings to corporations, etc.

Rainer Dumpff, CEO of Dumpff Project Management, reported about his decades-long experience in China, from where, as a young man, he wanted to know China in two weeks and soon realized that that was impossible. Among other occupations, he has worked with the aeronautic industry and has represented the Dresdner Musikfestspiele (musical festival) in China.

Yuan Jie, Germanist and columnist, highlighted the recent positive shift in the German government attitude toward China, mentioning statements by Industry Minister Katherina Reiche in a video connection to the inauguration of the BASF plant mentioned above, Merz’s statements on the eve of his visit to China, burying decoupling forever, and the German International Chamber of Commerce calling China “a reliable partner.”

In the following podium’s interviews with the panelists, the question was posed: Where do prejudices come from? Eberspächer, among others, said they come from ignorance, and joined the call for more learning about China in schools.

The event was judged by all participants as a promising starting point toward a paradigmatic change in Germany (Europe)-China relations.


Challenge Our Axioms To Become Wiser and More Loving

International Peace Coalition, Week 149

by EIR Staff

April 10—Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute and convener of the International Peace Coalition (IPC), opened the IPC’s 149th meeting by discussing the ongoing peace negotiations in Islamabad, Pakistan, which must reverse the global political and strategic “debacle” of the last week. She noted that, while U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to annihilate Iran and end its civilization, all while declaring victory for the United States in the ceasefire, the reality is much different. Iran clearly suffered significant damage and loss of life, but after all the bombing, its will remains unbroken. Any plan to split the Iranian population backfired, she said, and the country is more unified than ever. Iran is in full control of the Strait of Hormuz and wanted to demonstrate its ability to stand up to the United States, which it did.

Zepp-LaRouche continued, noting that the United States sought to show it is still a world leader but garnered little support, diminishing its power and prestige. The region is now in shambles, and the world is in disarray. Persian Gulf States no longer view U.S. military bases on their territory as a guarantee of protection; instead, their presence is now seen as a liability. The U.S. has not only endangered the entire region by starting the Iran War, but ultimately the entire world. Trump must now halt the war, as its continuation would threaten the global economy.

The erratic behavior of the United States, Zepp-LaRouche added, makes it uncertain what will happen next. She stated that Trump is the first U.S. president to act purely in the interest of Israel and that, with the exception of Spain and a few other countries, most Western leaders lacked the courage to challenge American policy. The “Coalition of the Willing” is still promoting war with Russia, which led Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova to say that Germany had not learned the lesson from two world wars. Zepp-LaRouche referenced a recent article by Pino Arlacchi—former Undersecretary-General of the UN and Director of the UN Office of Drugs and Crime who worked with the Taliban in 1999-2002 to successfully eliminate opium poppy cultivation in Afghanistan—who suggested replacing the UN Security Council with a “peace enforcement mechanism” elected by the UN General Assembly. She referenced nuclear weapons experts such as Dr. Theodore Postol and Steven Starr, who both have warned that if one nation uses a nuclear weapon, many more nuclear weapons will be unleashed. Zepp-LaRouche warned that the entire architecture of the world order is collapsing, potentially resulting in chaos. However, she also suggested that a new order, based on reason and modeled after the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia, is possible. She called for an Extended Oasis Plan for the different countries of Southwest Asia, reaching from India to the Mediterranean, from the Caucasus to the Gulf States—to determine which development corridors are most suitable to develop that region as a whole—given that the entire region is an expanding desert, that would have to involve the creation of new water sources. Zepp-LaRouche highlighted Pope Leo XIV’s  positive role in mobilizing people to stop the war.

The next speaker, Col. (ret.) Richard H. Black, former head of the U.S. Army’s  Criminal Law Division at the Pentagon and former Virginia state senator, warned of Israel’s role in keeping the war going. Black said that Israel’s goal is a permanent presence of U.S. troops on the ground, but that President Trump must maintain control over Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Black added that U.S. negotiators Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner have an “Israel First” agenda, and that almost the entire U.S. Congress is subservient to Israel. He stated that Israel’s assassination campaign in the Iran War has killed all of Iran’s senior pro-Western negotiators, who are now being replaced by hardliners, which will only prolong the war, a goal of Netanyahu.

Col. (ret.) Alain Corvez, former advisor to the French Defense and Interior Ministries said that Western hegemony is weakening due to the Iran War and that the world balance of power is shifting, predicting that BRICS nations, especially Russia, China, and Iran, will grow in influence. The United States will retain power but have less global influence and deeper divisions at home. Corvez said that both Trump and the Democrats have been unsuccessful in the U.S., and that Diane Sare’s independent U.S. presidential campaign offers a solution and will gain support.

Dialogue of Civilizations and Learning Our True History

Asked to comment, Helga Zepp-LaRouche called on Americans to reflect on their own history during this 250th year of independence, asserting that a return to the policies of Ben Franklin and John Quincy Adams would facilitate collaboration with the Global Majority. She stated that the sooner the West understands and works with the Global Majority, the sooner we can overcome the war and other crises facing humanity.

Pakistani-American academic, Dr. Abdullah Al-Ahsan, discussed the role of the former head of UK’s Arab Bureau, Bernard Lewis and his American sidekick Samuel Huntington in creating the Clash of Civilizations, noting that the government of Iran called for a Dialogue of Civilizations in the 1990s. Instead of pursuing this opening, however, the “War on Terror” was used to divide the world. Al-Ahsan said that civilizations can only thrive when people have dignity and society is based on truth-seeking. He warned that Pakistan is working for a ceasefire, but many of its leaders are “in the pocket” of America and cannot be trusted.

Speaking from Canada, Yakov Rabkin, professor emeritus of history at the Université de Montréal said that he has spent much of his life studying the history of Zionism and the establishment of the relatively young state of Israel, which he described as a “settler colonial entity.” The violence in West Asia, he said, comes from the attempt to expand an ideology of Jewish supremacism in a borderless ethnic national state within the already populated land of Palestine. He said that settlers feel insecure, so they try to expand their borders, but the new borders are equally insecure because of the fundamentally failed nature of their outlook. Since its founding, Israel has relied on military force. He said that Israel has nuclear weapons and will not hesitate to use them to defend itself from an “existential threat,” but this is not a threat to the nation or its people, but a threat to the Apartheid system. Rabkin quoted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying in 2001 that “America is a thing that we can move easily,” and added that Israel labels anyone who resists this type of manipulation as “antisemitic.” Those who would like to know more, he said, should read his recent short book Israel in Palestine: Jewish Rejection of Zionism.

Intervening In the U.S. Scene

Jose Vega, candidate for Congress in New York’s 15th congressional district (the Bronx), discussed his campaign and a candidates debate the night before where he reiterated his call for the Oasis Plan and for 10,000 new engineers in Gaza and the Bronx. There was a clear freakout from the Democratic establishment when he pointed out that his contender, former vice chair of the Democratic National Committee Michael Blake, was a servant of the Jeffrey Epstein Class.

Diane Sare, independent candidate for U.S. President called on Congress to end the war by simply cutting off all funding—which, she said, was how the U.S. war in Vietnam was finally brought to an end in Aug. 1973. She said that much of the Democratic Party leadership wants the war to continue in order for their candidates to win the U.S. midterm elections. She stated that two of the Democratic Congress members who were responsible for tabling the recent War Powers Resolution—U.S. Rep. Gregory Meeks (from New York’s 5th congressional district) and U.S. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (from New York’s 8th congressional district)—also take money from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), and make deals with the “donor class.” Sare mentioned an event she attended the day before on Capitol Hill that was focused on the need to impeach Trump. She pointed out that Trump is just the logical conclusion of over 20 years of political insanity—a 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq based on lies, President Obama’s invasion of Libya, President Biden’s toleration of two years of genocide in Gaza, 200 Congressmen signing a letter attacking South Africa’s challenge to that genocide at the International Court of Justice in the Hague, and the Epstein Class controlling the federal government. Therefore, we must remove Trump’s hand from the levers of power, but do so without further dividing the country.

During the question period, Helga Zepp-LaRouche returned to the issue of the Clash of Civilizations, stating that the enemy image shifted from communism to Islam when the Cold War ended. She said that the trick has been to constantly divide people, but we must unite people, who may have differences, using the highest level of debate. IPC co-moderator Dennis Small spoke of Pope Leo XIV’s  efforts to stop the war, despite threats from U.S. Under Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby. He noted that the Pope has called for a worldwide vigil for peace on April 11. Dennis Speed, another IPC co-moderator, added that the Pope will come to the United States in July but has declined an invitation from President Trump to meet him at the White House on July 4, the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, instead spending that day in Lampedusa, an Italian island off the coast of Tunisia, helping migrants attempting to enter Europe from Africa.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche concluded the event by commenting on some of the questions that came in. First she spoke of the importance of the Pope going to Africa later this year. She said that it is important that voices from the Global South are heard and that the Pope spent much of his career in Peru, which gives him insight into the needs of the Global Majority. She said that she is not giving up on the West, but that it needs a “moral revival,”  and that it has been targeted with schemes to dumb down the population with war propaganda and entertainment. Zepp-LaRouche said that people need to challenge their axioms to become wiser and more loving to one another, and that we need great culture, life-long learning, and Socratic dialogues with our neighbors.


Page 2 of 150123...Last