Top Left Link Buttons

General

Category Archives

What Kind of Peace Do We Seek?

June 12—The International Peace Coalition (IPC) held its 158th consecutive weekly meeting on June 12 titled, “What Kind of Peace Do We Seek?” Helga Zepp-LaRouche, the founder of the IPC and the Schiller Institute, began the event by challenging the participants with the idea that our actions today will decide whether the world will move in a good or bad direction. She said that U.S. President Donald Trump has now announced the 38th or 39th peace deal with Iran that is “just around the corner,” but the downing of a U.S. Apache helicopter has triggered new fighting. Zepp-LaRouche said that Trumpʼs idea that the United States will take total control of Iranʼs oil and gas is “ludicrous.” Self-described “U.S Secretary of War,” Pete Hegseth, has warned that the United States will “negotiate with bombs,” but Iran remains in a dominant position in the region.

In Europe, Zepp-LaRouche warned, many leaders are promoting a military buildup, but U.S. Air Force General Alexus Grynkewich, the NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe, has said that Russia is not looking for a conflict. Other military leaders have warned that Europe is “sleepwalking into war,” as the EU tries to expand from 27 member nations to 40. Zepp-LaRouche warned that the German military is highly visible with recruitment drives and events such as air shows.

Magnifica Humanitas vs. the Tower of Babel

In opposition to the warmongers, said Zepp-LaRouche, Pope Leo XIV is an important voice for peace, equal to Chinaʼs President Xi Jinping. The Pope recently visited Spain, speaking to the Parliament in Madrid, addressing 600,000 youth, and, while in the Canary Islands, calling for a Christian response to the migrant crisis. On May 15, Pope Leo issued his encyclical entitled “Magnifica Humanitas: On Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence,” which Zepp-LaRouche urged everyone to read. While the Pope never mentions any names in this document, today’s flawed leaders are easily identified. The Pope criticizes those billionaires whose only concern is becoming trillionaires, and those who wish to build their “Tower of Babel.” He rejects class struggle and promotes the Chinese concept of “Li,” the idea of harmony in the world. The encyclical advocates for a classical idea of truth and beauty, and states that the new name for peace is development.

In celebration of the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the Pope will be awarded the 38th annual Liberty Medal by the Philadelphia-based National Constitution Center on July 3. He will deliver his acceptance speech from the Vatican via video, challenging Americans to look deeper into the true history and mission of the nation. Zepp-LaRouche contrasted this to the Ultimate Fighting Championship “UFC Freedom 250” cage-fighting event on the South Lawn of the White House on Sunday, June 14—Trump’s 80th birthday—a complete disgrace, contrary to every principle represented by the Declaration of Independence. This will all be addressed at the July 5 event in Philadelphia sponsored by Diane Sareʼs independent campaign for the 2028 U.S. presidential election.

Zepp-LaRouche confronted the false narrative imposed by the British, that the United States was created by “one atrocity after another.” The United States was created, she asserted, to end the rule by “blue bloods and monarchies.” She continued, the United States was established for the “common good,” where “all men are created equal,” with a commitment to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” However, this happiness is not banal, but the promotion of a fulfilling life. Benjamin Franklin worked with collaborators internationally to make the revolution a success. The British continued afterwards to undermine the new nation, later by promoting the U.S. Civil War on the side of the Confederacy, subverting the nation at every turn, with the mess that we now see. Zepp-LaRouche said that we need to bring back the true American revolutionary tradition.

The next speaker, Col. (ret.) Alain Corvez from France, said that the United States and Israel are acting like outlaw nations trying to impose their will on the world. He said that much of the world is opposed to this “supremacist” outlook. Iran is actively resisting this domination and is supported by many nations, including powerful nations such as China and Russia. President Trump, with his domestic support in “free fall” and difficulties in the U.S. midterm elections, finds himself being blocked on several fronts. Corvez said that the United States must realize that it is not the policeman of the world. He further warned that Israel may try to sabotage any peace arrangements.

Col. Corvez added that European leaders should agree to accept Russian resources and seek peace. Russia is a very big nation and does not need new territory. European leaders such as German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and French President Emmanuel Macron have failed and are disconnected from their populations. The European Union works against the interests of Europe and has lost most of its support. Because of their failures, these leaders need a confrontation with Russia as the only way to stay in power. Corvez said that Russia could easily deliver crushing blows to Ukraine, but has restrained itself.

On the Ground Report from Spain

Next, Spanish Schiller Institute activist María Josefa Rodríguez Hernández gave a report on her activities during the Pope’s visit to Spain. She said that her small but dynamic group held a Schiller Institute banner calling for the dialogue of civilizations and distributed an open letter to Pope Leo XIV by Helga Zepp-LaRouche. During the visit, the Pope reminded Spain of its leadership in uniting diverse populations using its School of Translators in Toledo under Alphonso the Wise in the late 1200s. Speaking to 600,000 Spanish youths, the Pope called on them to spark a new humanity and to do it with love. With its uncompromising stand on issues such as genocide in Gaza, Spain has challenged the legal order of the world. Speaking to both the Global North and Global South, the Pope said that we must invest in “our common home,” with education, research, and civil society. He spoke of the importance of Africa and our responsibility to eliminate poverty. Zepp-LaRouche responded to this report from Spain saying that the Pope’s intervention on the world is of the utmost importance and essential to peace. Corvez agreed, adding that we must consider the needs and concerns of others.

Father Harry J. Bury, an international peace activist, retired Catholic priest, and the founder of Twin Cities Nonviolent, said that world events made him heartbroken but hopeful. He said that the Pope’s encyclical reminded him of the importance of each individual person and the need to honor each person’s contribution to society. In order to attempt to justify violence, some people are identified as evil. But, he said, there are no evil people in the world, just people who need education. History shows us that violence does not lead to peace, and dropping bombs does not change people for the better. Father Bury blessed the Pope and Lyndon and Helga LaRouche.

A short video was shown by Ray McGovern—the former CIA analyst and co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)—who also spoke of the importance of the latest encyclical by the Pope and its call for forgiveness. McGovern praised the 1963 encyclical by Pope John XXIII, “Pacem in Terris,” which was used by President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev to foster peace. Kennedy used this encyclical to shape his June 10, 1963 “A Strategy of Peace” speech at American University, and Khrushchev later published Kennedyʼs speech in Pravda and Izvestia, two leading Soviet papers. McGovern said that the Pope had written that encyclical during that dangerous period of 1963, and that we are again in increasingly dangerous times.

Who Is Not Equal?

Diane Sare, the independent LaRouche candidate for U.S. President, thanked Helga Zepp-LaRouche for her earlier comments identifying the true history and role of the United States in the world. Sare rejected the false idea that the United States was created in order to give power to rich, White slaveholders. She argued that the founders clearly stated that “all men are created equal.” If this is not true, she asked, who is not equal?

Sare said that the recent elections showed that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is losing its control over U.S. elections. While AIPAC succeeded in defeating Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY), it was unable to stop many others, such as Congressman Ro Khanna (D-CA), or the Egyptian-American doctor running for Congress in the Trenton area of New Jersey, Dr. Adam Hamawy.

Americans, Sare said, especially young Americans, have had enough, and reject the recent drive in Congress to merge U.S. and Israeli intelligence—with former CIA head Mike Pompeo applauding the CIA’s strong partnership with the UK’s Secret Intelligence Service, MI6. She read deeply moving quotes from George Washingtonʼs 1796 Farewell Address, which called on Americans to “cultivate peace and harmony with all.” Washington further argued that a nation cannot be happy if it is not virtuous. Sare also read from Lyndon LaRoucheʼs 1998 article, “When Franklin Roosevelt Was Interrupted,” which asserts that the only legitimate role of the state is to enhance the individual. Later, Zepp-LaRouche added that the world has many forms of governments—but the question is whether a government improves the character of the individual; if it does, then it is a good government.

Dennis Small, Ibero-American editor for EIR magazine, asked a profound question about the nature of man, referring to Zepp-LaRoucheʼs 2022 Ten Principles, which states, “… that man is fundamentally good and capable to infinitely perfect the creativity of his mind and the beauty of his soul.” Pope Leo, during his visit to Spain, said, “The desire for goodness, beauty, and truth is rooted in the very DNA of humanity…. These are profound ideas that cannot be ignored.” Zepp-LaRouche answered by saying that Pope Leo has an affinity to Nicholas of Cusa, who said that all evil is a lack of development. Cusa, a 15th Century Cardinal, philosopher and scientist, criticized the static, Manichean idea that evil has a constant presence and that there is a permanent struggle between good and evil. Zepp-LaRouche later added that in the latest encyclical, the Pope does not mention any names, but puts his finger on every single structure of sin. This all points to the Epstein class, and gives us the ability to judge current history. She added that this encyclical is the moral corrective that the world needs and a tool not just for understanding the past, but also for acting in the present.


The Schiller Institute Releases Video Summaries of Historic Berlin Conference of May 30-31, 2026

The Schiller Institute has produced two video summaries of the historic conference in Berlin on May 30-31,  “The End of 500 Years of Colonialism — For a Dialogue of Civilizations, The Urgency of a New Global Security and Development Architecture”  The conference brought together speakers from more than 15 countries, to discuss the causes of the present civilizational crisis, and ideas on how to replace the establishment responsible for the crisis with a New Paradigm, which governs on behalf of all citizens of all sovereign nations.

The conference took up two themes: “The Strategic Danger of War and Chaos: Can It Be Stopped?”; and “The End of 500 Years of Colonization: Toward a New Era of Peace and Development.”  Beginning with sections of the keynote address of Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche, there are selections from 13 other speakers, which demonstrate as a whole the quality of deliberation needed to achieve a New Paradigm.  

From the short selections of presentations on the two videos, we are certain you will be inspired to watch the full videos of the entire conference, and share them with others.

One thing is certain: a new era is coming.  Join us to make sure it is one which reflects the inherent dignity of a truly human civilization. 


Press Release: Schiller Institute in Berlin: Hopeful Deliberation in the Face of War and Chaos

With hot kinetic wars in eastern Europe and Southwest Asia threatening to become endless wars, or even explode into nuclear conflict; and with the economic consequences of these wars threatening even more lives, it is legitimate to raise the question, “Where are the adults in the room? Are there no leaders or movements offering an alternative?”

A two-day conference sponsored by the Schiller Institute May 30-31 took up this challenge, with a series of speakers including present and former government officials, journalists, academics and activists from fifteen nations. Held in the German capital of Berlin, there was a unity of effect which emerged, stemming from a willingness of the speakers to address the underlying dynamics of the crisis, rather than sticking to the language of geopolitics, which is shaping the narrative, and which is designed to limit the discussion.

By addressing the issues which are usually glossed over or completely ignored, the 150 or so in attendance left with a heightened sense that not only are there solutions, but they can be realized, through a revival of diplomacy, driven by an active citizenry engaged in making creative discoveries in order to find solutions.

Given the urgency of the global crisis, the Schiller Institute has compiled two videos, with summaries of some of the speakers, divided into the two themes addressed. The first video takes up “The Urgent Need for a New International Security and Development Architecture;” the second, “The End of 500 years of Colonization: Toward a New Era of Peace and Development.”

The keynote address by Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche identified the crisis as resulting from efforts of imperial forces centered in London to perpetuate a global system which is bankrupt. The attempt to maintain a Unipolar Order, she said, requires war against Russia and China, nations in the forefront committed to building a new security and development architecture.

Zepp-LaRouche has been organizing for this New Paradigm for years, based on her collaboration with her late husband, economist and statesman Lyndon LaRouche. Under her direction, the Schiller Institute has become a leader in the fight to replace the collapsing system with a new security and development architecture. In her keynote, she said this requires that the “West” should reach out to the Global South, which is moving in this direction. To do this, we citizens in the West must “rediscover our souls.”

This theme was taken up by many of the speakers whose comments are included in the two summary videos. These include former U.S. diplomat Chas Freeman, former U.N. official Pino Arlacchi, Professor Zhang Weiwei of the China Institute at Fudan University, Ambassador Eskindir Yirga Asfaw from Ethiopia, and U.S. nuclear expert Theodore Postol.

The full two-panel conference is available at the Schiller Institute website.

In addition, for broad circulation, two summary videos, have just been released and are posted on the Schiller YouTube channel and website.


The End of 500 Years of Colonialism -For a Dialogue of CivilizationsThe Urgency of a New Global Security and Development Architecture

International Schiller Institute In-Person Conference, 30-31 May, 2026, Berlin, Germany


Press Release: Schiller Institute in Berlin: Hopeful Deliberation in the Face of War and Chaos


The Schiller Institute Releases Video Summaries of Historic Berlin Conference of May 30-31, 2026


  • Moderator: Stephan Ossenkopp
  • Helga Zepp-LaRouche (Germany), Founder of the Schiller Institute: “We will not let European 0civilization go under!”
  • Professor Zhang Wei (China), Director of the China Institute at Fudan University: “Building a Profitable Multipolar World Order”
  • Pino Arlacchi (Italy), former UN Deputy Secretary-General: “Are we sure that the coming economic storm will be global?”
  • Chas Freeman (USA), former U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia: “The Birth, Death, and Prospective Rebirth of the World Order” (via video)
  • Sanjay Tripathi (India), former senior official in Indian ministries: “The Urgent Need for a New Global Security”
  • Dr. Wolfgang Bittner (Germany, author: “Sovereignty, Neutrality, Culture”

Panel 2: Sovereignty and Consensus of the Governed

  • Moderator: Elke Fimmen
  • Jacques Cheminade (France), former presidential candidate, President of Solidarité et Progrès: “A New Beginning to Prevent the Extinction of Humanity”
  • Jürgen Schöttle (Germany), Engineer: “Economical Energy Supply and Sovereignty Are Inseparable”
  • Patrick Baab (Germany), German journalist and author
  • Retired Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Bosshard (Switzerland), former military advisor to the OSCE Secretary General
  • Dr. Jasminka Simić (Serbia), Editor, Radio-Television Serbia, Belgrade: “The China-inspired new form of cooperation among the states of the Global South from a Serbian perspective”
  • Dr. Theodore Postol (USA) , Professor Emeritus of Science, Technology, and National Security at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (via video)

Concert and Dialogue of Civilizations – Artists from China, Russia, Germany, Albania, and others

  • Almira Emiri (Albania) – Albanian concert pianist
  • Irina Zhuravleva (Russia) – Soprano
  • Fan Xu (China) – Chinese baritone
  • Almishba (Bulgaria) and Bulgarian singer,
  • Martin Kaptein – Russian pianist and author; Mozart, Fantasy in C minor, K. 475
  • Gabriele Gysi – Actress and author
  • Andrea Röschke Video presentation (Iran)
  • Dr. Bittner (Germany), Autor, Poems
  • Dr. Mostafa Maleki (Iran) – Iranian diplomat and Germanist: “Hafiz and Goethe, a spiritual encounter between Persia and Germany”
  • Artists’ Association Europe and Asia in Germany e.V. (Germany/China): “The Song of Lotus Picking”
  • Poetry from Various Cultures

Sunday, May 31

Panel 3: The End of 500 Years of Colonialism – Part 1

  • Moderator: Rainer Apel
  • Harley Schlanger (USA), 250th Anniversary of the American Revolution
  • H.E. Eskindir Yirga Asfaw (Ethiopia), Ambassador of Ethiopia
  • H.E. Majid Nili (Iran), Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran
  • Daud Azimi (Afghanistan), Board Member of the Afghan National Peace Front (PNF)
  • Video message from a group of young Ugandans

Panel 3: The End of 500 Years of Colonialism – Part 2

  • Moderator: Claudio Celani
  • Charles Onana (France/Cameroon), political scientist and author
  • Purnima Anand (India), President of the BRICS Forum India
  • Abbey Makoe (South Africa), journalist, founder of the Global South Media Network (via video)
  • Jérôme Ravenet (France), Professor of Philosophy, Sinologist (via video)
  • Wolfgang Riess (Germany), “The Future of the Automotive Industry”
  • Mrutjuanjai Mishra (India), Journalist (Commentator for the Times of India)

International Peace Coalition, Week 157: Science and Culture Are the Core of Politics

June 6, 2026 (EIRNS)—The 157th weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) on June 5 included a deep discussion on the disaster in the Mideast between Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Schiller Institute founder and IPC initiator, and the former Israeli Director of “Peace Now,” (also a former member of the Israeli Knesset), and a Palestinian- American journalist who founded the Community Media Network. The meeting also heard from the conductor of a symphony orchestra in rural Iowa, who is also a hog farmer, which led to a rich discussion of the role of culture in politics during the open Q & A session following the presentations.

Helga opened by noting that both war fronts, in Southwest Asia and in Ukraine, are increasing the danger of world war. Ukraine’s deadly drone strikes on a school in Luhansk on May 22 and on St. Petersburg on June 3, the opening day of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) have increased the angry response from Moscow, with Russia launching extensive bombing across Ukraine and increasing broader discussion there of “teaching” Europe a lesson by using a nuclear weapon. “Where are the adults?” she asked. She noted that some are calling on former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder to be made a delegate to Russia, with many voices objecting, but Helga said “Let him try.” On the other hand, she said Russian President Vladimir Putin’s envoy Kirill Dmitriev has repeated his call for building a tunnel under the Bering Strait, thus connecting the Eurasian continent to the Americas—an idea long promoted by the LaRouche movement. She characterized Germany’s losing the vote by members of the UN General Assembly to represent Europe on the UN Security Council, to Austria and Portugal, as a sign that the Global South is disgusted with Germany’s support for war, and for saying nothing about the U.S. bombing of the Nord Stream pipeline, showing that Germany is a virtual colony to the United States.

The next speaker was Mossi Raz, the former Director of Peace Now in Israel, and a former member of the Israeli Knesset. He strongly denounced Israel’s occupation of Palestine, and called for Germany and all countries to call for statehood for Palestine. The Arab League peace plan for the conflict should be the basis of negotiations, he said. On Lebanon, they are weak—weak government, weak army—and cannot deliver on the agreement they reached with Israel. What can be done? The President of the United States Donald Trump can do it, as has been shown when he told Israel to stop the war on Gaza (although it is clear they never stopped), and to not bomb Beirut. Raz asserted that this made them stop, and the U.S. president—this one or the next one—is the only one who can make Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu stop. He added that Hezbollah takes orders from Iran, but added that Hamas does NOT take orders from Iran.

Next was Palestinian-American journalist Daoud Kuttab, founder and former director of the Institute of Modern Media at Al-Quds University in Jerusalem. He showed his book, “State of Palestine NOW,” arguing that all of the wars in the region are based on the injustice to the Palestinians. He insisted that all nations must call for the recognition of Palestine, even if it is an occupied Palestine, so that they can negotiate with Israel on a state-to-state basis. He also insisted that the West Bank and Gaza must be de-linked from Israel. He said the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) has its problems, and PLO President Mahmoud Abbas is a weak leader—but he is the President of Palestine and we need to recognize him. Foreign leaders who are not happy with Abbas, he said, should engage with the imprisoned Marwan Barghouti (24 years in prison) who was elected head of Fatah. He is strong, moral, honest, and is thought of as the true leader of the Palestinian nation (Kuttab called him “the next President of Palestine” much like a Nelson Mandela).

Helga agreed with Kuttab, that Barghouti has “proven integrity.” She added, however, that with the destruction of Gaza, of Afghanistan, of Yemen, of Syria, that a plan for “peace through development was required, as exemplified by the LaRouche Oasis Plan—see Oasis Plan Is a ‘Model for the World’. She said that if even a few states backed it, it could work.

Kuttab added that negotiations must be comprehensive, “not gradual, like the Oslo Accords.”

Raz added that he had met Mahmoud Abbas many times, and choosing their leaders is the Palestinian’s business.

Helga agreed that getting a Palestinian state is a starting point, but what is required is a “grand design” for the entire region, from India to the Mediterranean. Addressing the needs of all countries, including Israel. China has shown that it can achieve such a grand design, greening the deserts, building large scale development corridors like the CPEC (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor). She said that with such a program, in ten years the desert would become a lush garden, like during the era of the Silk Road. What is needed is such a grand vision, to change the view of the future.

Harley Schlanger then gave a report on the May 30-31 Schiller Institute Conference, “The End of 500 Years of Colonialism -For a Dialogue of Civilizations—The Urgency of a New Global Security and Development Architecture.” He characterized the presentations by China’s Zhang Weiwei, by Amb. Chas Freeman, by Pino Arlachi, the video by four young people from Uganda, by Dr. Wolfgang Bittner from Germany, and the cultural panel, with Iranian poetry, Chinese dance, and Western classical music.

This was followed by Bob McConnell, conductor of the Southeast Iowa Symphony Orchestra for 35 years, and also an Iowa hog farmer, who reported on the destructive economic policies dragging down rural areas, shutting down towns and institutions. He spoke of his commitment to defend and expand classical music. Located in the center of the North American farmbelt, he explained how he recruits people who know nothing about classical music, to understand and appreciate it. Two short videos were played showing McConnell with the orchestra demonstrating the opening and grand finale of Beethoven’s 9th Symphony. This sparked excitement in the discussion period over the connection of beautiful music to intervening for peace.

Other issues brought up in the Q&A included one caller who said she was an economist but was searching for a means to get active politically—but not as an economist, which is “such a horrible profession.” So, she was very happy about doing it through music. Helga said she was glad she loved the music, but that economics was not a “horrible profession,” noting that her late husband Lyndon LaRouche was a great economist, but insisted that economists must be also scientists and artists. The problem, said Helga, is that nearly all economists today are monetarists who know only about money, not real economics.

Another person called for a new “ideology” for the new world architecture promoted by the Schiller Institute and the IPC. Helga said, no not an “ideology,” which is a construct, but what’s needed is the “search for truth.” She quoted Norbert Brainin, the great lead violinist for the Amadeus Quartet, who called the work of their quartet “truth seeking musicians, getting closer and closer as we go along.”

eir


Zepp-LaRouche: Germany’s Defeat at the UN, an Opportunity to Change; Germany Must Cooperate with the Global South!

The following press release was issued on June 5 by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, the founder of the Schiller Institute.

Viewed from a deeper historical perspective, Germany’s failure to win a rotating seat on the UN Security Council offers an urgently needed opportunity to reorient German policy. This author has long argued that, in light of the entrenched geopolitical confrontation between NATO, on the one hand, and Russia and China on the other, the Global South needs to make its voice heard more loudly and forcefully in the international debate—and that is precisely what these states have done by rejecting Germany’s candidacy. German institutions should use the result to conduct an honest analysis of a foreign policy, that has clearly been a complete failure, and to redefine one corresponding to Germany’s true interest.

The initial reaction from Foreign Minister Wadephul and in most media commentaries, however, follows the same long-standing pattern of self-deception: Russia was to blame, they claimed, then the bureaucracy, the application process started too late, etc., etc. Others, such as the FAZ, commented that the UN isn’t that important anyway, and the Hessian Minister for European and International Affairs, Manfred Pentz of the CDU, even called for Germany to cut its financial contributions to the UN as a result.

The only thing that will really help Germany is take a hard look at the causes of the “bitter disappointment,” which could only have come as a surprise to those who have been sitting on their Eurocentric high horse.

The shift in international perception of German politics has been in full swing for several years now. The generally positive image of Germany that once prevailed throughout the world—that of the land of Bach and Beethoven, of Goethe, Schiller, and the Humboldts, of a nation of engineering and inventors—has been lost for quite some time.

The de facto unconditional support for Israel’s actions in Gaza—for which the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant—has damaged Germany’s reputation, and this damage will continue to grow as long as the governments in Berlin maintain their position. For, while the crimes of the Nazis only became fully known and understood by the general public after the end of World War II, Israel’s crimes in Gaza—and increasingly also in the West Bank and Lebanon—are in the spotlight of the global public. The fact that Germany did not approve the extension of the mandate for the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) in December 2025 under pressure from Israel, and has cracked down brutally on pro-Palestinian protests domestically, has further tarnished Germany’s image.

People everywhere are talking about the double standard that prevails in this country. Berlin constantly claims it is the champion of international law, but Chancellor Merz finds the kidnapping of an elected head of state in Venezuela too “complex” to take a position on, and needs “time” to assess it. That was five months ago, and he has still not reached a conclusion.

During the first unprovoked war of aggression by Israel and the United States against Iran in June 2025, Merz uttered the unspeakable words that “Israel is doing the dirty work for all of us”; during the second such attack by the U.S. and Israel, the consequences of which threaten to plunge the global economy into the abyss, he has remained reserved, merely stating that it is not our war.

Virtually no one in the countries of the Global South agrees with the endlessly repeated mantra that Russia attacked Ukraine in an unprovoked war. These countries recognized all too clearly in NATO’s actions the parallels to their own oppression by the colonial powers, and they also remember very vividly who came to their aid during their struggle for independence at the time, namely, the Soviet Union and China.

But what is manifestly lacking in Berlin, is a feel for the tectonic epochal shift now taking place worldwide. At the time of German reunification and the end of the Cold War, Germany undoubtedly enjoyed the sympathy of the so-called developing countries. But it was lost, step by step, to the extent that Germany and the countries of the collective West attempted to impose a unipolar world order through methods such as color revolutions, regime change, unilateral sanctions, and wars of intervention.

The combination of all aspects of this imperial and neocolonialist policy has produced a massive boomerang effect, in the course of which these countries have increasingly sought to distance themselves from the influence of the collective West. China’s economic rise—unprecedented in history—and its policy of win-win cooperation offer the nations of the Global South the chance to finally overcome the 500-year period of colonialism.

The defeat in the UN vote is the long-overdue wake-up call for Germany to finally free itself from its lamentable status as a colony of the Anglosphere (the whole world ridicules our lack of reaction to Biden’s announced sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines), and to stand on the right side of history. This can only mean cooperation with the countries of the Global Majority, that is, with 85% of humanity, on equal footing as equal partners. Instead of spreading racist chimeras, such as Josep Borrell’s fiction of a European garden surrounded by a jungle, we should help Africa, Asia, and Latin America build beautiful gardens of their own. Additionally, we could also ensure that our own bridges are repaired in a timely manner, that our industry recovers, and that our students once again learn something.

In that way, even if unintentionally, Annalena Baerbock will have contributed something positive to German politics through her fraudulently obtained presidency of the UN General Assembly, from which position she had to announce Germany’s defeat in the vote.


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: “Win-Win” Strategy for a Dialogue of Civilizations

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.
Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, June 3, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

The Schiller Institute convened an international conference in Berlin, Germany, May 30-31.  Participants from many nations described the opening session as “inspiring,” given the danger and depravity surrounding us all.

Amb. Chas W. Freeman, Jr. (USFS, Ret.) opened his speech during the opening panel by saying:

We are witnessing the end of multiple epochs. The world of our parents and our childhood is no more. Never has the dire description of current events attributed to Antonio Gramsci seemed more apt. “The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters.” Sadly, my country, the United States of America has become such a monster, foolishly dismembering the world order it originally sponsored.

Over the course of the full, two-day event, panelists from 15 nations, with experience and skills in international relations, economics, science, and the arts, spoke in three sessions. An evening concert featured music and poetry presented by representatives from various cultures and nations. Some 150 attendees came from nations throughout Europe, as well as students from Africa and other continents.

The proceedings of the conference underscore that a new international security and development architecture can be created if those who are willing to champion the solutions presented at the conference join forces.

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her weekly Live Dialogue to discuss how we can seize the opportunities presented to us at the conference. 


The Confluence of Science and Faith

Report on IPC #155

May 22, 2026 (EIRNS)—The 155th consecutive weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) began with comments by coalition initiator and Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche. She announced that the immediate target of the IPC’s mobilization will be the special open debate of the UN Security Council which will be held on May 26, with the theme of “Upholding the Purposes and Principles of the UN Charter and Strengthening the UN-centered International System,” to be chaired personally by Foreign Minister Wang Yi of China, this month’s UNSC rotating chair.

She reviewed the proposals which came out of last week’s EIR roundtable discussion, and added that it was heartening that more proposals, such as the Africa 2063 plan, are emerging that complement her proposals and those which have been presented at IPC meetings.

Zepp-LaRouche has composed a special letter addressed to the UNSC session “What we are interested in is to be putting on the table an entirely different approach,” she said, not the usual geopolitics, but “long term survivability of the region and all the countries involved.” The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) warned this week that, due to resource shortages which are a consequence of the Iran war, on top of the ongoing economic financial breakdown, we are already in the initial stages of a “food price shock,” potentially leading to famines. She warned that those who planned the war anticipated such an outcome; “There are all these crazy Malthusian ideas in the background,” including the policy of so-called “controlled disintegration.”

Science and Religion

Dr. Abdullah Ahsan of Pakistan, Professor of Comparative Civilization at Istanbul Şehir University in Türkiye, identified three stages of a solution to the present crisis. In the short term, there would be former Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu’s proposal for a neutral third party—he proposed Pakistan, Indonesia, Türkiye and Malaysia—to manage the Strait of Hormuz, because the United States and Iran have reached a total deadlock and the entire world has become “victim of this Hormuz situation.” In the middle term, we must revive the concept of a Dialogue of Civilizations, which has been advocated in various forms by various parties, including the Schiller Institute and the government of Iran. In the long term, we must address the view that there is a conflict between science and religion. Modern secularism, Dr. Ahsan asserted, stems from the ideas of German philosopher Immanuel Kant. Ahsan’s studies, however, “suggest that all civilizations in history are rooted in divine guidance.” He cited the subject of evolution, where science and faith appear to diverge.

Later in the discussion, co-moderator Dennis Small posed a solution to the apparent conflict. Man has the capability to creatively modify the physical universe, which is a demonstration of free will and thereby moral capability, and represents a so-called “metaphysical” dimension in what most consider physics, the existence of which refutes the theories of Kant. He cited LaRouche’s Oasis Plan as an example of a creative idea impacting the physical universe.

Still later, Helga Zepp-LaRouche weighed in on this topic. She contrasted the dogmatic vs. the philosophical view in religion. Saint Augustine pointed out that Plato had earlier arrived at similar conclusions to those of Jesus Christ, demonstrating that there is no contradiction between faith and knowledge. Fifteenth-Century Catholic Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa said that evolution takes place through the “lifting” of the lower domain by the more developed organizing principle of the higher domain, and Zepp-LaRouche went on to describe how the Russian/Ukrainian scientist Vladimir Vernadsky arrived at the same conclusion with his conception of the Noösphere. This idea is also reflected in the book of Genesis, where Man is said to be imago viva Dei, in the living image of God, because of his capacity for creativity.

The Worsening Crisis in Agriculture

Jesus Holguin Cazares, President of the Kansas Cattlemen’s Association, reported that the costs of chemicals necessary for agriculture have gone up dramatically due to the Iran war. This places an extraordinary and unsustainable burden on smaller, independent producers. In addition, the cartelization of agriculture poses a threat to smaller producers who cannot compete with enormous agribusinesses, and this translates to higher prices for consumers. Corporations are buying up distressed farms, leading to further cartelization.

Jon Baker, Vice President of the Iowa Stockgrowers Association also reported on the crisis in farming and ranching, which he said was getting much worse as a result of the Iran War, for example, with its effect on pushing up prices for diesel, essential for agriculture. He also took aim at the predations of speculators and agribusiness. Baker gave the example of his own operation, which lost $80,000 in value over the past two days, just due to so-called “market factors.” The mega agro-cartels are increasing their concentration, while independent farm operations decrease.

Dennis Small followed Holguin with a report from the National Front to Save the Mexican Countryside, which just held a 3,500-person demonstration in Mexico City and met with the country’s Agriculture Minister to discuss policy solutions to the crisis. The Front calls for an agriculture policy in Mexico which prioritizes feeding the population rather than coddling the speculators of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and the destructive neo-liberal economic policies such as those associated with Ludwig von Mises of the Austrian School. They are calling for Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum to change policy, but they are not joining the efforts of U.S. speculators and the U.S. President Donald Trump administration to undermine and destabilize her government.

Independent U.S. congressional candidate in New York’s 15th congressional district (The Bronx) Jose Vega offered a report on the progress of his campaign, and commented on how essential it is for American citizens to take up the profound ideas discussed at the IPC meetings. He led a rally at the United Nations yesterday to shape the discussion at the May 26 UN Security Council special session.

Discussion: Fighting the Oligarchy

Zepp-LaRouche elaborated on the various facets of the drive for war being promoted by the leading “Western” faction, emphasizing that “unilateral sanctions are a form of war,” and expressed the hope that these conflicts can be resolved with a new international security and development architecture. In response to a question, she called for global support for Cuba, a major victim of U.S. sanctions, particularly in light of Cuba’s benevolent role in assisting other nations with medical support. Zepp-LaRouche observed that the “Davos men,” AKA the Epstein Class or “the super class of the dead souls,” are interested in perpetuating the crises for the purposes of advancing their geopolitical agendas.

Dr. Ahsan raised the question of how to end oligarchic control over politics, and offered the example of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, which exerts economic pressure on the Israeli regime, as a small step in the right direction.

In conclusion, Zepp-LaRouche reiterated her warnings that both the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the wars initiated by Israel in Southwest Asia, are potential flashpoints for nuclear war. Co-moderator Dennis Speed noted that next week’s meeting will mark the 156th-consecutive weekly meeting of the IPC, the three-year anniversary of its founding. The sort of persistence demonstrated by the IPC in carrying on these meetings will be important in building the grass-roots machine required to change the policies of the United States and Europe. [eir]


To the Governments of the United Nations: A Policy to Bring Peace and Development to Southwest Asia

May 17, 2026

On May 26, China, as the rotating chair of the United Nations Security Council, will convene a meeting under the theme “Upholding the Purposes and Principles of the UN Charter and Strengthening the UN-Centered International System.” The meeting will occur with the world at a historical branching point, where humanity can choose to go in one of two very different directions. The unprovoked and aggressive war against Iran, and its ensuing effects, has placed the Middle East at an impasse and threatens a potentially fatal escalation into a global economic depression or even global nuclear war. At the same time, the meetings between President Xi Jinping and President Donald Trump in Beijing have opened the door to a new level of cooperation between the world’s two largest economies, creating an opportunity to implement an entirely different policy than that which created today’s crisis. Therefore, it is a very precious moment in history, which must not be missed.

Such a policy was actually discussed and elaborated at the recent EIR Emergency Roundtable on May 15, “The Iran War and the ‘Controlled Disintegration’ of the World Economy.” Speaking there was former Prime Minister of Türkiye Ahmet Davutoğlu, along with Iranian Ambassador to Mexico Abolfazl Pasandideh, former UN Special Rapporteur for Palestine Richard Falk, and others. Prof. Davutoğlu insisted that bilateral U.S.-Iran bargaining cannot resolve the regional crisis, saying only “a comprehensive regional framework” can produce sustainable peace. He outlined his recent proposal consisting of four converging issues, where “progress on any one front is unlikely without parallel movement on the others”:

1. The Strait of Hormuz: Form a coalition of trusted intermediaries, such as Türkiye, Pakistan, Malaysia, and Indonesia, to administer the Strait under a UN Security Council mandate.

2. Nuclear arrangements: Establish a new agreement whereby Iran would deposit enriched uranium in Türkiye in exchange for fuel for civilian use, reaffirm its commitment not to pursue nuclear weapons, and have its right to peaceful nuclear energy formally recognized by the U.S. Over time, the region would move toward freedom from nuclear weapons “including those held by Israel.” (It should be noted that this was the basis for the 2010 Tehran Agreement, which Davutoğlu helped mediate, along with Brazil and the IAEA, and which was rejected by President Obama at the time. Notably, President Lula of Brazil handed President Trump a copy of this agreement during his recent May 7 visit to Washington.)

3. Regional security architecture: A multilayered structure of confidence-building and regional security would be established, evolving toward “a Middle Eastern equivalent of the 1975 Helsinki Accords.”

4. Palestine: Israel would be offered integration into the architecture—full diplomatic normalization and formal guarantees—in exchange for recognizing Palestinian statehood and ending military operations in Lebanon.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute and Editor-in-Chief of EIR magazine, had opened the roundtable dialogue by proposing a complete policy change for Southwest Asia, namely that the nations of the entire region, from India to the Mediterranean, from the Caucasus to the Gulf, adopt a joint policy of “Peace through Development.” An integrated “Extended Oasis Plan,” in which a program for reversing the desertification of Southwest Asia, modelled on China’s transformation of Xinjiang province and its northwest deserts, is combined with the extension of development corridors throughout Southwest Asia. As in the times of the ancient Silk Road, the Middle East can become the hub connecting Asia, Africa and Europe again, with a bright future for all countries which are now in a state of humanitarian crisis and poverty as a result of interventionist wars.

When Zepp-LaRouche proposed to add the Extended Oasis Plan to the proposal put on the table by Davutoğlu, which is actually very similar to the Tehran Agreement of 2010 signed by Türkiye, Brazil and Iran, the latter replied:

“I fully agree. The best way of peace is economic interdependency. There is no other way. You can sign peace plans, you can make many declarations, but the best way of peace is economic interdependency. Whenever you have economic interdependency, nobody will be starting a war. So, economic interdependency means development.” Davutoğlu added that the best response to this war is to create a sense of “regional belonging, supporting each other. And I fully share your opinion; and we can bring these proposals together, a geopolitical solution framework, as well as a developmental, visionary project together.”

The participants in the EIR Roundtable agreed, therefore, to send this combined proposal to the governments convening the UN Security Council special session on May 26, requesting that it be taken into consideration at this meeting. Even as the UN Charter must be upheld, the UN is nevertheless in urgent need of reform, which would give the Global Majority a proportionate representation. Part of this reform must be the establishment of a new security and development architecture, which must take into account the interest of every single country on the planet.

A combination of Mr. Davutoğlu’s proposal and the Extended Oasis Plan can be an indispensable component of such a new architecture.

Any and all of the participants in the EIR roundtable stand prepared for further assistance, if so required.

Sincerely yours,

Helga Zepp-LaRouche
Founder, Schiller Institute
Editor-in-Chief, EIR
May 17, 2026


Resources




Create Peace Where War Divides: LaRouche’s Oasis Plan

Build nuclear power plants for desalination, new transportation corridors, new ports—create a future for the next fifty years! That’s the only way to put together an idea of a common interest for everyone in the region.

This short AI generated video is available in different languages:
French, Arabic, Spanish


Page 2 of 151123...Last