Top Left Link Buttons

tobi

Author Archives

Press Release: Schiller Institute in Berlin: Hopeful Deliberation in the Face of War and Chaos

With hot kinetic wars in eastern Europe and Southwest Asia threatening to become endless wars, or even explode into nuclear conflict; and with the economic consequences of these wars threatening even more lives, it is legitimate to raise the question, “Where are the adults in the room? Are there no leaders or movements offering an alternative?”

A two-day conference sponsored by the Schiller Institute May 30-31 took up this challenge, with a series of speakers including present and former government officials, journalists, academics and activists from fifteen nations. Held in the German capital of Berlin, there was a unity of effect which emerged, stemming from a willingness of the speakers to address the underlying dynamics of the crisis, rather than sticking to the language of geopolitics, which is shaping the narrative, and which is designed to limit the discussion.

By addressing the issues which are usually glossed over or completely ignored, the 150 or so in attendance left with a heightened sense that not only are there solutions, but they can be realized, through a revival of diplomacy, driven by an active citizenry engaged in making creative discoveries in order to find solutions.

Given the urgency of the global crisis, the Schiller Institute has compiled two videos, with summaries of some of the speakers, divided into the two themes addressed. The first video takes up “The Urgent Need for a New International Security and Development Architecture;” the second, “The End of 500 years of Colonization: Toward a New Era of Peace and Development.”

The keynote address by Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche identified the crisis as resulting from efforts of imperial forces centered in London to perpetuate a global system which is bankrupt. The attempt to maintain a Unipolar Order, she said, requires war against Russia and China, nations in the forefront committed to building a new security and development architecture.

Zepp-LaRouche has been organizing for this New Paradigm for years, based on her collaboration with her late husband, economist and statesman Lyndon LaRouche. Under her direction, the Schiller Institute has become a leader in the fight to replace the collapsing system with a new security and development architecture. In her keynote, she said this requires that the “West” should reach out to the Global South, which is moving in this direction. To do this, we citizens in the West must “rediscover our souls.”

This theme was taken up by many of the speakers whose comments are included in the two summary videos. These include former U.S. diplomat Chas Freeman, former U.N. official Pino Arlacchi, Professor Zhang Weiwei of the China Institute at Fudan University, Ambassador Eskindir Yirga Asfaw from Ethiopia, and U.S. nuclear expert Theodore Postol.

The full two-panel conference is available at the Schiller Institute website.

In addition, for broad circulation, two summary videos, have just been released and are posted on the Schiller YouTube channel and website.


The Schiller Institute Releases Video Summaries of Historic Berlin Conference of May 30-31, 2026

The Schiller Institute has produced two video summaries of the historic conference in Berlin on May 30-31,  “The End of 500 Years of Colonialism — For a Dialogue of Civilizations, The Urgency of a New Global Security and Development Architecture”  The conference brought together speakers from more than 15 countries, to discuss the causes of the present civilizational crisis, and ideas on how to replace the establishment responsible for the crisis with a New Paradigm, which governs on behalf of all citizens of all sovereign nations.

The conference took up two themes: “The Strategic Danger of War and Chaos: Can It Be Stopped?”; and “The End of 500 Years of Colonization: Toward a New Era of Peace and Development.”  Beginning with sections of the keynote address of Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche, there are selections from 13 other speakers, which demonstrate as a whole the quality of deliberation needed to achieve a New Paradigm.  

From the short selections of presentations on the two videos, we are certain you will be inspired to watch the full videos of the entire conference, and share them with others.

One thing is certain: a new era is coming.  Join us to make sure it is one which reflects the inherent dignity of a truly human civilization. 


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: E3 Stooges Racing to Armageddon

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.
Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, June 10, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche did not mince words in discussions with colleagues on Monday when she repeated her warning that the world continues to sit on a powder keg, charged by the possible escalation of two regional crises—one in Ukraine and the other in Southwest Asia—both of which are ripe to erupt into the trigger of a devastating world war.

This risk was on full display over the past 48 hours, as missiles flew between Israel and Iran following Israel’s bombing of Lebanon on Sunday, despite Trump’s directives to Netanyahu to not blow up the possibility of a peace agreement; similarly in Crimea, a Ukrainian drone attacked a passenger train traveling to Moscow, the third such targeting of civilians in less than a week, all egged on by the psychotic “E3” leaders in Europe, who, the same day, announced from London renewed, unending military support for their Ukrainian proxy.

On the other hand, the vast majority of nations are moving to establish a new, more just system of global governance and development, a new paradigm, as was recently seen at the just-concluded St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, and more broadly in the win-win cooperation and dialogue processes of the Belt and Road Initiative, BRICS, SCO, and other efforts.

The extreme and very palpable tension between these two simultaneously existing futures will not and cannot be resolved—at least not in a direction that ensures the survival of civilization—without addressing the underlying, false axioms that got us into this very dangerous mess in the first place.

“Today we confirm that the decisive question remains the same,” Pope Leo XIV told an audience of thousands gathered in Madrid on June 7. “What does it mean to be truly human?”

This question is at the center of solving today’s existential crises; it is the principal issue for statecraft, economics, culture, science, education, and relations among nations.

“The desire for goodness, beauty and truth is rooted in the very DNA of humanity,” the Pope declared, as he went on to develop a concept of love-in-action to build a world based on human dignity. The goodness and creative power of the human mind recognized by Pope Leo are the basis of Lyndon and Helga LaRouche’s organizing over the past five decades for a new system of development for the entire planet, which Helga Zepp-LaRouche has renewed in her call for a new security and development architecture based on the principle “that man is fundamentally good and capable to infinitely perfect the creativity of his mind and the beauty of his soul.”

The goodness and unity of humankind was also the central issue of the American Revolution and the formation of the American republic. Why, then, would Americans tolerate that the celebration of our 250th year of independence from the slavery of empire be marked by a caged fight on the lawn of the White House? Why would we permit anything less than the highest expressions of beauty to represent the founding of our nation? Have we all become beasts?

What about the bestiality tolerated by those in the West, poor Lethean heirs of a profound history of ideas and statecraft, as we watch our nations march to impose war and poverty on other countries at the behest of a yet-to-be-prosecuted Epstein-class of elites?

“The most important thing is that we in Europe and America must rediscover our souls,” Helga Zepp-LaRouche urged at the Schiller Institute conference in Berlin on May 30. “America, as it was founded 250 years ago, was an anti-colonial and anti-imperialist bastion of freedom. And we in Europe must rekindle in our hearts and minds the love of humanity that was self-evident to Dante Alighieri, Joan of Arc, Leibniz, Schiller, and Beethoven. We must send a clear message to Russia, to China, to Africa, indeed to the whole world, that we neither intend to perish in a Third World War nor allow our magnificent cultural tradition…to continue to fade into oblivion. Rather, we must make a sacred commitment to let these pearls of human culture, through a dialogue of cultures and civilizations, together blossom into a new Renaissance of humanity.”

Answer Zepp-LaRouche’s call to action at this decisive moment in history, in which we still have a chance to decide in which direction humanity will go. Circulate the proceedings of that Berlin conference, “The End of 500 Years of Colonialism—For a Dialogue of Civilizations: The Urgency of a New Global Security and Development Architecture,” and organize.

Take what Pope Leo told a gathering of 600,000 youth on June 7 as your mission assignment: “In the face of the emptiness of indifference and compliance, before the violence of war and lies, you must be the sparks of a new humanity.”


International Peace Coalition, Week 157: Science and Culture Are the Core of Politics

June 6, 2026 (EIRNS)—The 157th weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) on June 5 included a deep discussion on the disaster in the Mideast between Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Schiller Institute founder and IPC initiator, and the former Israeli Director of “Peace Now,” (also a former member of the Israeli Knesset), and a Palestinian- American journalist who founded the Community Media Network. The meeting also heard from the conductor of a symphony orchestra in rural Iowa, who is also a hog farmer, which led to a rich discussion of the role of culture in politics during the open Q & A session following the presentations.

Helga opened by noting that both war fronts, in Southwest Asia and in Ukraine, are increasing the danger of world war. Ukraine’s deadly drone strikes on a school in Luhansk on May 22 and on St. Petersburg on June 3, the opening day of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) have increased the angry response from Moscow, with Russia launching extensive bombing across Ukraine and increasing broader discussion there of “teaching” Europe a lesson by using a nuclear weapon. “Where are the adults?” she asked. She noted that some are calling on former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder to be made a delegate to Russia, with many voices objecting, but Helga said “Let him try.” On the other hand, she said Russian President Vladimir Putin’s envoy Kirill Dmitriev has repeated his call for building a tunnel under the Bering Strait, thus connecting the Eurasian continent to the Americas—an idea long promoted by the LaRouche movement. She characterized Germany’s losing the vote by members of the UN General Assembly to represent Europe on the UN Security Council, to Austria and Portugal, as a sign that the Global South is disgusted with Germany’s support for war, and for saying nothing about the U.S. bombing of the Nord Stream pipeline, showing that Germany is a virtual colony to the United States.

The next speaker was Mossi Raz, the former Director of Peace Now in Israel, and a former member of the Israeli Knesset. He strongly denounced Israel’s occupation of Palestine, and called for Germany and all countries to call for statehood for Palestine. The Arab League peace plan for the conflict should be the basis of negotiations, he said. On Lebanon, they are weak—weak government, weak army—and cannot deliver on the agreement they reached with Israel. What can be done? The President of the United States Donald Trump can do it, as has been shown when he told Israel to stop the war on Gaza (although it is clear they never stopped), and to not bomb Beirut. Raz asserted that this made them stop, and the U.S. president—this one or the next one—is the only one who can make Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu stop. He added that Hezbollah takes orders from Iran, but added that Hamas does NOT take orders from Iran.

Next was Palestinian-American journalist Daoud Kuttab, founder and former director of the Institute of Modern Media at Al-Quds University in Jerusalem. He showed his book, “State of Palestine NOW,” arguing that all of the wars in the region are based on the injustice to the Palestinians. He insisted that all nations must call for the recognition of Palestine, even if it is an occupied Palestine, so that they can negotiate with Israel on a state-to-state basis. He also insisted that the West Bank and Gaza must be de-linked from Israel. He said the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) has its problems, and PLO President Mahmoud Abbas is a weak leader—but he is the President of Palestine and we need to recognize him. Foreign leaders who are not happy with Abbas, he said, should engage with the imprisoned Marwan Barghouti (24 years in prison) who was elected head of Fatah. He is strong, moral, honest, and is thought of as the true leader of the Palestinian nation (Kuttab called him “the next President of Palestine” much like a Nelson Mandela).

Helga agreed with Kuttab, that Barghouti has “proven integrity.” She added, however, that with the destruction of Gaza, of Afghanistan, of Yemen, of Syria, that a plan for “peace through development was required, as exemplified by the LaRouche Oasis Plan—see Oasis Plan Is a ‘Model for the World’. She said that if even a few states backed it, it could work.

Kuttab added that negotiations must be comprehensive, “not gradual, like the Oslo Accords.”

Raz added that he had met Mahmoud Abbas many times, and choosing their leaders is the Palestinian’s business.

Helga agreed that getting a Palestinian state is a starting point, but what is required is a “grand design” for the entire region, from India to the Mediterranean. Addressing the needs of all countries, including Israel. China has shown that it can achieve such a grand design, greening the deserts, building large scale development corridors like the CPEC (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor). She said that with such a program, in ten years the desert would become a lush garden, like during the era of the Silk Road. What is needed is such a grand vision, to change the view of the future.

Harley Schlanger then gave a report on the May 30-31 Schiller Institute Conference, “The End of 500 Years of Colonialism -For a Dialogue of Civilizations—The Urgency of a New Global Security and Development Architecture.” He characterized the presentations by China’s Zhang Weiwei, by Amb. Chas Freeman, by Pino Arlachi, the video by four young people from Uganda, by Dr. Wolfgang Bittner from Germany, and the cultural panel, with Iranian poetry, Chinese dance, and Western classical music.

This was followed by Bob McConnell, conductor of the Southeast Iowa Symphony Orchestra for 35 years, and also an Iowa hog farmer, who reported on the destructive economic policies dragging down rural areas, shutting down towns and institutions. He spoke of his commitment to defend and expand classical music. Located in the center of the North American farmbelt, he explained how he recruits people who know nothing about classical music, to understand and appreciate it. Two short videos were played showing McConnell with the orchestra demonstrating the opening and grand finale of Beethoven’s 9th Symphony. This sparked excitement in the discussion period over the connection of beautiful music to intervening for peace.

Other issues brought up in the Q&A included one caller who said she was an economist but was searching for a means to get active politically—but not as an economist, which is “such a horrible profession.” So, she was very happy about doing it through music. Helga said she was glad she loved the music, but that economics was not a “horrible profession,” noting that her late husband Lyndon LaRouche was a great economist, but insisted that economists must be also scientists and artists. The problem, said Helga, is that nearly all economists today are monetarists who know only about money, not real economics.

Another person called for a new “ideology” for the new world architecture promoted by the Schiller Institute and the IPC. Helga said, no not an “ideology,” which is a construct, but what’s needed is the “search for truth.” She quoted Norbert Brainin, the great lead violinist for the Amadeus Quartet, who called the work of their quartet “truth seeking musicians, getting closer and closer as we go along.”

eir


Zepp-LaRouche: Germany’s Defeat at the UN, an Opportunity to Change; Germany Must Cooperate with the Global South!

The following press release was issued on June 5 by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, the founder of the Schiller Institute.

Viewed from a deeper historical perspective, Germany’s failure to win a rotating seat on the UN Security Council offers an urgently needed opportunity to reorient German policy. This author has long argued that, in light of the entrenched geopolitical confrontation between NATO, on the one hand, and Russia and China on the other, the Global South needs to make its voice heard more loudly and forcefully in the international debate—and that is precisely what these states have done by rejecting Germany’s candidacy. German institutions should use the result to conduct an honest analysis of a foreign policy, that has clearly been a complete failure, and to redefine one corresponding to Germany’s true interest.

The initial reaction from Foreign Minister Wadephul and in most media commentaries, however, follows the same long-standing pattern of self-deception: Russia was to blame, they claimed, then the bureaucracy, the application process started too late, etc., etc. Others, such as the FAZ, commented that the UN isn’t that important anyway, and the Hessian Minister for European and International Affairs, Manfred Pentz of the CDU, even called for Germany to cut its financial contributions to the UN as a result.

The only thing that will really help Germany is take a hard look at the causes of the “bitter disappointment,” which could only have come as a surprise to those who have been sitting on their Eurocentric high horse.

The shift in international perception of German politics has been in full swing for several years now. The generally positive image of Germany that once prevailed throughout the world—that of the land of Bach and Beethoven, of Goethe, Schiller, and the Humboldts, of a nation of engineering and inventors—has been lost for quite some time.

The de facto unconditional support for Israel’s actions in Gaza—for which the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant—has damaged Germany’s reputation, and this damage will continue to grow as long as the governments in Berlin maintain their position. For, while the crimes of the Nazis only became fully known and understood by the general public after the end of World War II, Israel’s crimes in Gaza—and increasingly also in the West Bank and Lebanon—are in the spotlight of the global public. The fact that Germany did not approve the extension of the mandate for the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) in December 2025 under pressure from Israel, and has cracked down brutally on pro-Palestinian protests domestically, has further tarnished Germany’s image.

People everywhere are talking about the double standard that prevails in this country. Berlin constantly claims it is the champion of international law, but Chancellor Merz finds the kidnapping of an elected head of state in Venezuela too “complex” to take a position on, and needs “time” to assess it. That was five months ago, and he has still not reached a conclusion.

During the first unprovoked war of aggression by Israel and the United States against Iran in June 2025, Merz uttered the unspeakable words that “Israel is doing the dirty work for all of us”; during the second such attack by the U.S. and Israel, the consequences of which threaten to plunge the global economy into the abyss, he has remained reserved, merely stating that it is not our war.

Virtually no one in the countries of the Global South agrees with the endlessly repeated mantra that Russia attacked Ukraine in an unprovoked war. These countries recognized all too clearly in NATO’s actions the parallels to their own oppression by the colonial powers, and they also remember very vividly who came to their aid during their struggle for independence at the time, namely, the Soviet Union and China.

But what is manifestly lacking in Berlin, is a feel for the tectonic epochal shift now taking place worldwide. At the time of German reunification and the end of the Cold War, Germany undoubtedly enjoyed the sympathy of the so-called developing countries. But it was lost, step by step, to the extent that Germany and the countries of the collective West attempted to impose a unipolar world order through methods such as color revolutions, regime change, unilateral sanctions, and wars of intervention.

The combination of all aspects of this imperial and neocolonialist policy has produced a massive boomerang effect, in the course of which these countries have increasingly sought to distance themselves from the influence of the collective West. China’s economic rise—unprecedented in history—and its policy of win-win cooperation offer the nations of the Global South the chance to finally overcome the 500-year period of colonialism.

The defeat in the UN vote is the long-overdue wake-up call for Germany to finally free itself from its lamentable status as a colony of the Anglosphere (the whole world ridicules our lack of reaction to Biden’s announced sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines), and to stand on the right side of history. This can only mean cooperation with the countries of the Global Majority, that is, with 85% of humanity, on equal footing as equal partners. Instead of spreading racist chimeras, such as Josep Borrell’s fiction of a European garden surrounded by a jungle, we should help Africa, Asia, and Latin America build beautiful gardens of their own. Additionally, we could also ensure that our own bridges are repaired in a timely manner, that our industry recovers, and that our students once again learn something.

In that way, even if unintentionally, Annalena Baerbock will have contributed something positive to German politics through her fraudulently obtained presidency of the UN General Assembly, from which position she had to announce Germany’s defeat in the vote.


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: “Win-Win” Strategy for a Dialogue of Civilizations

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.
Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, June 3, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

The Schiller Institute convened an international conference in Berlin, Germany, May 30-31.  Participants from many nations described the opening session as “inspiring,” given the danger and depravity surrounding us all.

Amb. Chas W. Freeman, Jr. (USFS, Ret.) opened his speech during the opening panel by saying:

We are witnessing the end of multiple epochs. The world of our parents and our childhood is no more. Never has the dire description of current events attributed to Antonio Gramsci seemed more apt. “The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters.” Sadly, my country, the United States of America has become such a monster, foolishly dismembering the world order it originally sponsored.

Over the course of the full, two-day event, panelists from 15 nations, with experience and skills in international relations, economics, science, and the arts, spoke in three sessions. An evening concert featured music and poetry presented by representatives from various cultures and nations. Some 150 attendees came from nations throughout Europe, as well as students from Africa and other continents.

The proceedings of the conference underscore that a new international security and development architecture can be created if those who are willing to champion the solutions presented at the conference join forces.

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her weekly Live Dialogue to discuss how we can seize the opportunities presented to us at the conference. 


The End of 500 Years of Colonialism -For a Dialogue of CivilizationsThe Urgency of a New Global Security and Development Architecture

International Schiller Institute In-Person Conference, 30-31 May, 2026, Berlin, Germany


Press Release: Schiller Institute in Berlin: Hopeful Deliberation in the Face of War and Chaos


The Schiller Institute Releases Video Summaries of Historic Berlin Conference of May 30-31, 2026


  • Moderator: Stephan Ossenkopp
  • Helga Zepp-LaRouche (Germany), Founder of the Schiller Institute: “We will not let European 0civilization go under!”
  • Professor Zhang Wei (China), Director of the China Institute at Fudan University: “Building a Profitable Multipolar World Order”
  • Pino Arlacchi (Italy), former UN Deputy Secretary-General: “Are we sure that the coming economic storm will be global?”
  • Chas Freeman (USA), former U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia: “The Birth, Death, and Prospective Rebirth of the World Order” (via video)
  • Sanjay Tripathi (India), former senior official in Indian ministries: “The Urgent Need for a New Global Security”
  • Dr. Wolfgang Bittner (Germany, author: “Sovereignty, Neutrality, Culture”

Panel 2: Sovereignty and Consensus of the Governed

  • Moderator: Elke Fimmen
  • Jacques Cheminade (France), former presidential candidate, President of Solidarité et Progrès: “A New Beginning to Prevent the Extinction of Humanity”
  • Jürgen Schöttle (Germany), Engineer: “Economical Energy Supply and Sovereignty Are Inseparable”
  • Patrick Baab (Germany), German journalist and author
  • Retired Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Bosshard (Switzerland), former military advisor to the OSCE Secretary General
  • Dr. Jasminka Simić (Serbia), Editor, Radio-Television Serbia, Belgrade: “The China-inspired new form of cooperation among the states of the Global South from a Serbian perspective”
  • Dr. Theodore Postol (USA) , Professor Emeritus of Science, Technology, and National Security at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (via video)

Concert and Dialogue of Civilizations – Artists from China, Russia, Germany, Albania, and others

  • Almira Emiri (Albania) – Albanian concert pianist
  • Irina Zhuravleva (Russia) – Soprano
  • Fan Xu (China) – Chinese baritone
  • Almishba (Bulgaria) and Bulgarian singer,
  • Martin Kaptein – Russian pianist and author; Mozart, Fantasy in C minor, K. 475
  • Gabriele Gysi – Actress and author
  • Andrea Röschke Video presentation (Iran)
  • Dr. Bittner (Germany), Autor, Poems
  • Dr. Mostafa Maleki (Iran) – Iranian diplomat and Germanist: “Hafiz and Goethe, a spiritual encounter between Persia and Germany”
  • Artists’ Association Europe and Asia in Germany e.V. (Germany/China): “The Song of Lotus Picking”
  • Poetry from Various Cultures

Sunday, May 31

Panel 3: The End of 500 Years of Colonialism – Part 1

  • Moderator: Rainer Apel
  • Harley Schlanger (USA), 250th Anniversary of the American Revolution
  • H.E. Eskindir Yirga Asfaw (Ethiopia), Ambassador of Ethiopia
  • H.E. Majid Nili (Iran), Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran
  • Daud Azimi (Afghanistan), Board Member of the Afghan National Peace Front (PNF)
  • Video message from a group of young Ugandans

Panel 3: The End of 500 Years of Colonialism – Part 2

  • Moderator: Claudio Celani
  • Charles Onana (France/Cameroon), political scientist and author
  • Purnima Anand (India), President of the BRICS Forum India
  • Abbey Makoe (South Africa), journalist, founder of the Global South Media Network (via video)
  • Jérôme Ravenet (France), Professor of Philosophy, Sinologist (via video)
  • Wolfgang Riess (Germany), “The Future of the Automotive Industry”
  • Mrutjuanjai Mishra (India), Journalist (Commentator for the Times of India)

Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: Extended Oasis Plan Key to New Development Architecture

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.
Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, May 27 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

At 10:00 Tuesday morning in New York, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi opens the United Nations Security Council’s high-level debate, “Upholding the Purposes and Principles of the UN Charter and Strengthening the UN-Centered International System.” Secretary-General António Guterres briefs. Foreign ministers and senior diplomats of the world’s nations are in the chamber. Implicitly before them is the proposal “To the Governments of the United Nations: A Policy To Bring Peace and Development to Southwest Asia,” circulated since May 17 by the Schiller Institute and the International Peace Coalition — the operational synthesis of the four-point regional framework former Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu set out at the May 15 EIR Roundtable and the Extended Oasis Plan proposed there by Helga Zepp-LaRouche.

Two days later, on Thursday May 28, Wang Yi participates in the Group of Friends of Global Governance meeting in New York — the 43-country coalition, predominantly drawn from the Global South, launched at the UN on December 9, 2025 to advance President Xi Jinping’s Global Governance Initiative. Across the same window, the Russian Federation opens its First International Security Conference in the Moscow region with 140 delegations from 120 nations. And the foreign ministers of the United States, India, Japan, and Australia convene the Quad in New Delhi the same day as the UNSC debate. Multiple diplomatic architectures, on parallel display in a single week.

The present moment will not wait. Russia’s Foreign Ministry today announced a sustained campaign of strikes against the Ukrainian defense-industrial complex in Kiev, with explicit warnings to foreign diplomatic personnel to leave the city — and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov phoned U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio to inform him personally. The May 23–24 retaliation that triggered the announcement used an Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missile — nuclear-capable, with no NATO defense against it. But to read this only as retaliation for Starobelsk is to miss the longer shape of what is happening. Across the Russian expert and political spectrum — from Karaganov and Trenin to Medvedev, Ryabkov, and Polyanskiy, with senior military analysts naming twelve European drone-production sites as legitimate targets — the question being asked aloud in Moscow is no longer whether to escalate, but how, and against whom. Helga Zepp-LaRouche warned on Monday: “I am really extremely concerned that this thing can go out of control very, very quickly.” Whether the human race survives this passage is not an idle question.

The Iran picture is mixed, and possibly more hopeful — but against a coordinated effort to render it moot. Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf (re-elected today), Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, and Central Bank Governor Abdolnaser Hemmati arrived in Doha for talks on the terms — frozen-assets release, Strait of Hormuz, uranium enrichment — that Pakistani and Chinese mediation have brought close to closure. The same day, Israel launched its largest wave of attacks on southern Lebanon in months, and the U.S. military carried out what CENTCOM called “self-defense” strikes on Iranian missile launch sites, small boats, and two empty Iranian-flagged tankers near the Strait. A last shot before a peace agreement, or a deliberate effort to scuttle it. The deal as currently structured — sanctions relief in exchange for nuclear concession — remains, as Trita Parsi argued on May 23, hostage to whoever next chooses to break it. The structure that would actually hold is the one Davutoğlu and Zepp-LaRouche have set out: a regional security architecture combined with the Extended Oasis Plan, a layered diplomatic and developmental order that makes war impossible among countries whose economies and cultures have come to depend on each other’s success.

Pope Leo XIV released his first encyclicalMagnifica Humanitas, on Monday. It had been signed on May 15, the 135th anniversary of his namesake Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum and the same day as the EIR Roundtable. Leo XIV’s central arguments — that the pursuit of profit cannot justify the systematic destruction of jobs, that autonomous weapons cannot be allowed to make use-of-force decisions, that the moral fitness of civilization is what is finally at stake — echo, in another voice, the framework EIR and the Schiller Institute have placed before the world.

That the proposal now in the UN’s hands has been carried by the Moscow-based journal New Eastern Outlook — written by an IPC contributor, Tamer Mansour, who reconstructs Lyndon LaRouche’s 1990 dictum that “without a policy of economic development, the Arabs and Israelis have no common basis for political agreement: no common interest” — is a concrete measure of how far the Davutoğlu-LaRouche framework has traveled in just ten days.

The question Davutoğlu answered at the May 15 Roundtable is the question put to the foreign ministers this week: “The best way to peace is economic interdependency. There is no other way. Whenever you have economic interdependency, nobody will be starting a war.” It is also the question Lyndon LaRouche pressed on Western policymakers from 1990 onward. Writing from his prison cell in February 1991 to mark the centenary of Rerum NovarumLaRouche warned that “any society which defies those considerations is threatening its own continued existence … a society which is not only losing the moral fitness to survive, but which, by God’s clock, will not long survive in its present form.”

Zepp-LaRouche made the case again today in the same idiom: “Unless we succeed in getting a debate on the need to have a new security and development architecture, which must take into account the interest of every single country, it will not work.” Whether tomorrow’s UNSC debate gets us that conversation, or whether the diplomatic moment is allowed to pass, is genuinely uncertain. What is not uncertain is what must be done.


The Confluence of Science and Faith

Report on IPC #155

May 22, 2026 (EIRNS)—The 155th consecutive weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) began with comments by coalition initiator and Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche. She announced that the immediate target of the IPC’s mobilization will be the special open debate of the UN Security Council which will be held on May 26, with the theme of “Upholding the Purposes and Principles of the UN Charter and Strengthening the UN-centered International System,” to be chaired personally by Foreign Minister Wang Yi of China, this month’s UNSC rotating chair.

She reviewed the proposals which came out of last week’s EIR roundtable discussion, and added that it was heartening that more proposals, such as the Africa 2063 plan, are emerging that complement her proposals and those which have been presented at IPC meetings.

Zepp-LaRouche has composed a special letter addressed to the UNSC session “What we are interested in is to be putting on the table an entirely different approach,” she said, not the usual geopolitics, but “long term survivability of the region and all the countries involved.” The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) warned this week that, due to resource shortages which are a consequence of the Iran war, on top of the ongoing economic financial breakdown, we are already in the initial stages of a “food price shock,” potentially leading to famines. She warned that those who planned the war anticipated such an outcome; “There are all these crazy Malthusian ideas in the background,” including the policy of so-called “controlled disintegration.”

Science and Religion

Dr. Abdullah Ahsan of Pakistan, Professor of Comparative Civilization at Istanbul Şehir University in Türkiye, identified three stages of a solution to the present crisis. In the short term, there would be former Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu’s proposal for a neutral third party—he proposed Pakistan, Indonesia, Türkiye and Malaysia—to manage the Strait of Hormuz, because the United States and Iran have reached a total deadlock and the entire world has become “victim of this Hormuz situation.” In the middle term, we must revive the concept of a Dialogue of Civilizations, which has been advocated in various forms by various parties, including the Schiller Institute and the government of Iran. In the long term, we must address the view that there is a conflict between science and religion. Modern secularism, Dr. Ahsan asserted, stems from the ideas of German philosopher Immanuel Kant. Ahsan’s studies, however, “suggest that all civilizations in history are rooted in divine guidance.” He cited the subject of evolution, where science and faith appear to diverge.

Later in the discussion, co-moderator Dennis Small posed a solution to the apparent conflict. Man has the capability to creatively modify the physical universe, which is a demonstration of free will and thereby moral capability, and represents a so-called “metaphysical” dimension in what most consider physics, the existence of which refutes the theories of Kant. He cited LaRouche’s Oasis Plan as an example of a creative idea impacting the physical universe.

Still later, Helga Zepp-LaRouche weighed in on this topic. She contrasted the dogmatic vs. the philosophical view in religion. Saint Augustine pointed out that Plato had earlier arrived at similar conclusions to those of Jesus Christ, demonstrating that there is no contradiction between faith and knowledge. Fifteenth-Century Catholic Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa said that evolution takes place through the “lifting” of the lower domain by the more developed organizing principle of the higher domain, and Zepp-LaRouche went on to describe how the Russian/Ukrainian scientist Vladimir Vernadsky arrived at the same conclusion with his conception of the Noösphere. This idea is also reflected in the book of Genesis, where Man is said to be imago viva Dei, in the living image of God, because of his capacity for creativity.

The Worsening Crisis in Agriculture

Jesus Holguin Cazares, President of the Kansas Cattlemen’s Association, reported that the costs of chemicals necessary for agriculture have gone up dramatically due to the Iran war. This places an extraordinary and unsustainable burden on smaller, independent producers. In addition, the cartelization of agriculture poses a threat to smaller producers who cannot compete with enormous agribusinesses, and this translates to higher prices for consumers. Corporations are buying up distressed farms, leading to further cartelization.

Jon Baker, Vice President of the Iowa Stockgrowers Association also reported on the crisis in farming and ranching, which he said was getting much worse as a result of the Iran War, for example, with its effect on pushing up prices for diesel, essential for agriculture. He also took aim at the predations of speculators and agribusiness. Baker gave the example of his own operation, which lost $80,000 in value over the past two days, just due to so-called “market factors.” The mega agro-cartels are increasing their concentration, while independent farm operations decrease.

Dennis Small followed Holguin with a report from the National Front to Save the Mexican Countryside, which just held a 3,500-person demonstration in Mexico City and met with the country’s Agriculture Minister to discuss policy solutions to the crisis. The Front calls for an agriculture policy in Mexico which prioritizes feeding the population rather than coddling the speculators of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, and the destructive neo-liberal economic policies such as those associated with Ludwig von Mises of the Austrian School. They are calling for Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum to change policy, but they are not joining the efforts of U.S. speculators and the U.S. President Donald Trump administration to undermine and destabilize her government.

Independent U.S. congressional candidate in New York’s 15th congressional district (The Bronx) Jose Vega offered a report on the progress of his campaign, and commented on how essential it is for American citizens to take up the profound ideas discussed at the IPC meetings. He led a rally at the United Nations yesterday to shape the discussion at the May 26 UN Security Council special session.

Discussion: Fighting the Oligarchy

Zepp-LaRouche elaborated on the various facets of the drive for war being promoted by the leading “Western” faction, emphasizing that “unilateral sanctions are a form of war,” and expressed the hope that these conflicts can be resolved with a new international security and development architecture. In response to a question, she called for global support for Cuba, a major victim of U.S. sanctions, particularly in light of Cuba’s benevolent role in assisting other nations with medical support. Zepp-LaRouche observed that the “Davos men,” AKA the Epstein Class or “the super class of the dead souls,” are interested in perpetuating the crises for the purposes of advancing their geopolitical agendas.

Dr. Ahsan raised the question of how to end oligarchic control over politics, and offered the example of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, which exerts economic pressure on the Israeli regime, as a small step in the right direction.

In conclusion, Zepp-LaRouche reiterated her warnings that both the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the wars initiated by Israel in Southwest Asia, are potential flashpoints for nuclear war. Co-moderator Dennis Speed noted that next week’s meeting will mark the 156th-consecutive weekly meeting of the IPC, the three-year anniversary of its founding. The sort of persistence demonstrated by the IPC in carrying on these meetings will be important in building the grass-roots machine required to change the policies of the United States and Europe. [eir]


Create Peace Where War Divides: LaRouche’s Oasis Plan

Build nuclear power plants for desalination, new transportation corridors, new ports—create a future for the next fifty years! That’s the only way to put together an idea of a common interest for everyone in the region.

This short AI generated video is available in different languages:
French, Arabic, Spanish


Page 1 of 31123...Last