Top Left Link Buttons

tobi

Author Archives

The Pope’s Message and the Struggle for Peace

Report on International Peace Coalition, Week 161

July 4, 2026 (EIRNS)—The 161st consecutive weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) took the unusual step of starting an hour later than usual, so that participants could view the live video address of Pope Leo XIV as he accepted the 38th Liberty Medal from the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Schiller Institute founder and IPC initiator, reported that “he represents in his person and his teaching… the values of the American Revolution and the founding fathers.” She recommended that everyone read his recent encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas, because the present state of American policy has deviated so far from those values.

Other IPC participants had varying reactions to the pope’s address. Ray McGovern, former CIA analyst, and cofounder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), prefaced his remarks by saying, “I’m a cradle Catholic.” He went on to acknowledge that Pope Leo is speaking out, but “in abstractions and generalities,” and he chose not to speak freely about “the blood-stained face of history.” He drew a comparison to the role of Pius XII, who also spoke in abstractions during World War II.

Later in the meeting, Zepp-LaRouche conceded that “maybe the Pope could have spoken more clearly against the war.” But she pointed out that leading warmongers in the United States have reacted sharply to comments by the Pope, and she said that there is a German proverb: “hit dogs bark,” meaning that their hysterical reactions were proof that the pope’s words had reached their intended targets.

McGovern said later that upon reflection, he still feels that he was not “too harsh on Pope Leo.” The United States is participating in a war of aggression and a genocide, and the Pope failed to “stick his neck out” and address these things directly, unlike Jesus who “didn’t speak in platitudes.”

Father Harry Bury, a renowned Catholic priest for 70 years, lifelong peace activist, member of the U.S. Catholic Priest Association, and the founder of Twin Cities Nonviolent, said that while this is a dangerous time that is escalating toward a third world war, he is still hopeful because of two factors: the Schiller Institute’s Oasis Plan, and the Pope’s recent encyclical.

During the discussion period, co-moderator Dennis Small called attention to the fact that the government of Spain has announced an amnesty for 1.3 million migrants. Two weeks earlier the Pope was in Spain, where he said that we need to have development so that people can remain in their home nations and not be forced to leave in order to survive. Mexican farm activist Alberto Vizcarra added that the Pope applies the doctrine of the “common good” to agriculture, which must prioritize the needs of humanity over the profits of speculators.

In her concluding remarks, Zepp-LaRouche said that the recent encyclical is “a very powerful intervention”; what he said about the American Revolution is more perceptive than the comments of anyone outside of Lyndon LaRouche and his collaborators. “We have to get Americans back to their soul,” she said.

Another participant noted that Peter Thiel of Palantir accuses the Pope of being an agent of communism because he calls for regulation of Artificial Intelligence.

The Current Strategic Picture

Zepp-LaRouche observed that it is difficult to say which theater of war is more dangerous, the Middle East or Ukraine. The answer is probably Ukraine, since it involves a direct conflict between NATO and Russia. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has publicly questioned the intention behind the Aug. 15, 2025 Anchorage, Alaska meeting between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. While the summit had seemed to offer a pathway to resolve the conflict, top leaders now wonder if it may have been a strategic deception by the West, like the Minsk Accords of 2014-2015. In the Middle East, the June 17 U.S.-Iran Memorandum of Understanding is “in complete shambles.” “Day by day, hour by hour, the energy and fertilizer crisis around the world is getting worse,” she said. The United States and Israel have foolishly pursued a policy of assassinating moderate Iranian leaders, putting the hardliners in control.

Prof. Richard Anderson Falk, professor emeritus of international law at Princeton University, Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor’s Chairman of the Board of Trustees and former United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories from 2008 to 2014, observed that the current crisis ironically overlaps the “fake celebration” of the 250th anniversary of the American Revolution. World leaders are captive to a dangerous ideology “rooted in militarist geopolitics.” Because they can’t accept the reality of military supremacy leading to political defeat, they are driving us closer to the nuclear precipice. They refuse to learn the lessons of the limits of military power. There is also the pernicious problem of private sector militarism: “Wars are profitable whether they are won or lost.” The founders of the United States understood that a democratic republic can’t handle peacetime militarism.

Ray McGovern added that there is an additional factor of danger to the NATO-Russia confrontation: Finland and Lithuania have announced that they will deploy nuclear weapons on their territory, and it is likely that the other Baltic states, Estonia and Latvia, will follow suit.

Professor Bassam el Hachem, Professor of Political Sociology at the University of Lebanon, said that Lebanon is more mobilized than ever against the American and Israel aggression. Hezbollah is called terrorist because they are resisting Israel. Israel is not satisfied with occupying Palestine; they want to go farther with a “Greater Israel” plan. He added that the attack on Iran in the midst of negotiations was a “dirty knife in the back of the Iranians.”

Co-moderator Dennis Speed read a message from Dennis Kucinich, former U.S. Congressman from Ohio and former U.S. Presidential Candidate, who was unable to attend in person. Kucinich is focused on Section 219 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which would merge U.S. defense and intelligence with Israelʼs defense technology capabilities. Speed reported that in a phone discussion with Kucinich, they both agreed that it should be called the Jonathan Pollard initiative, after the American-born Israeli spy and former intelligence analyst who was sentenced in 1987 to life imprisonment in the United States for spying for Israel, released in 2015, now lives in Israel and has even called for Israel to use nuclear weapons against Iran. Congress should not be asked to vote on the $901 billion NDAA without hearing debate on amendments. Kucinich urged everyone to read his July 2 article U.S.-Israel Military Merger Delayed: Here’s Why and How You Can Stop It.

Report from a Mexican Farm Activist

Baltazar Valdez Armentía, leader of United Farmers of Sinaloa and on the Steering Committee of the National Front to Save the Mexican Countryside, said that Mexican agriculture was threatened by three factors: the geopolitical crisis, including the Iran war which is causing shortages in energy and fertilizer; environmental collapse; and predatory financiers who make hunger central to their business strategy. “While farmers receive a pittance for their crops,” speculators rig the game to maximize their profits. His movement calls upon the Mexican government to confront the transnational agro-financial corporations. They are demanding parity prices and protective tariffs, a crackdown on speculation, and the construction of adequate infrastructure.

Report from Philadelphia

Independent congressional candidate Jose Vega (in New Yorkʼs 15th C.D., the Bronx) reported that he was in “an undisclosed location” in Philadelphia. The free outdoor public viewing of the Pope’s livestreamed remarks at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia was cancelled due to heat, so Jose took the opportunity to organize people who showed up hoping to attend. He commented on the recent election victories by insurgent Democrats, and observed that Republican Congressman Dan Crenshaw lost his primary as part of the same process we see in Maine, Michigan, New York and Colorado. We don’t have time to wait for new Congressmen to be sworn in, insisted Jose. “We need to be thinking about how to rebuild the parts of the world that we have destroyed,” using the method of the Oasis Plan. We can’t just be defined by what we oppose.

eir


Lenore Magazine published: Celebrate the 250th Anniversary of the True American Republic

This year marks the 250th anniversary of the creation of the American republic, and the world must remember the great ideas and minds that worked to create it.

Reader, I invite you to celebrate the true American History, one that was over 2,500 years in the making after Plato’s Republic was introduced to human thought. At the very end of this special issue of Leonore, read in full the 1776 Declaration of Independence and think on all the incredible contributions that were made toward it, and what contributions you, the intellectual inheritors of these ideas, can make now.

See below for highlights from this issue.

Table of Contents:

  • The Renaissance Roots of the American Revolution
    By Christopher Sare and Robert M. Wesser
  • The American Republic in 2026: There is Much Opportunity to Do Good
    By Diane Sare
  • The Declaration of Independence’s ‘Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness’: Franklin, Leibniz, and the Next 250 Years
    By David Shavin
  • Why and How France and Spain Helped the American Revolution
    By Karel Vereycken
  • The Netherlands’ Obscured Support for American Independence
    By Richard Sanders
  • The LaRouche Organization Statement: America at 250: Will We Now, As We Once Did, Come to the Aid of Our Country?
  • Lyndon LaRouche: A Success of the American, Anti-Oligarchical Revolution
    By Leonore Editorial Board
  • Urgent Appeal from Pope Leo XIV: ‘Stop! Repent! Before It’s Too Late!’ The New Name for Peace Is Development!
    By Helga Zepp-LaRouche
  • Beauty and Truth Can Rescue the American Republic
    By Cloret Ferguson
  • Artist Christian Schubart: Promoter of America’s Founding Ideals
    By Alexander Hartmann
  • Review: Oh, dear, America…
    By Philip S. Ulanowsky
  • Poetic Offerings
  • The United States’ Declaration of Independence from the British Empire

Want to subscribe to Leonore Magazine Online?
Become a recurring Schiller Institute member!

By becoming a recurring member of the Schiller Institute, you’ll not only support the Schiller Institute’s mission but also receive your quarterly digital subscription to Leonore, making you a sharp organizer for truth. 

Invest in the power of great ideas humanity has to offer. Become a recurring member today!

Yours in the fight for the Good,
Anastasia Battle
Editor-in-Chief, Leonore


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: Declare Independence from Imperial Geopolitics

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, July 1, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

Conflicts in both Iran and Ukraine have evolved over the recent days and weeks. Schiller Institute founder, Helga Zepp-LaRouche, summarized the strategic situation as follows in a discussion with associates: “The world situation remains one where the overall trajectory is towards World War III. And while the focus tends to shift between the Middle East and the Ukraine-Russia theater, the underlying dynamic is that the collective West, which is quite uncollected, is nevertheless not giving up their effort to keep dominance in the situation and suppress the legitimate demand by the Global Majority for a new, more just world economic order.”

Indeed, both the United States and Iran have resumed strikes over the recent days, at least to some degree. Despite President Donald Trump having claimed that “Iran has requested a meeting” to salvage the ceasefire, and that both sides would send negotiators to Doha, Qatar for talks on Tuesday, June 30, the President was quickly rebuffed by Iranian officials. Iran’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei stated that there will be no talks, technical or otherwise, with the U.S. this week. An Iranian technical delegation will visit Qatar this week, but it has no relation to US officials visiting the country.

At the same time, Israel is rapidly accelerating its involvement in conflicts throughout the region, as if designed to stymie any potential cessation of hostilities. It has continued strikes into southern Lebanon despite the ceasefire signed between the two. And with regard to the so-called ceasefire, a closer look shows that it has clearly been arranged to give Israel full leeway for continuing its provocative behavior. A similar situation is also happening In Syria, as Israel expands its presence there.

In Ukraine, the situation is becoming markedly worse. Ukraine has dramatically increased and intensified its drone strikes deep into Russia over the recent period, hitting many oil infrastructure facilities. President Putin has now had two meetings with oil principals in Russia over the previous few days. While the attacks have not caused major problems along the lines crowed about in the Western media, Putin did say they have caused “certain shortages.” Russia is currently drawing on its petroleum reserves, he noted, but they are at almost the same level as this time last year. The real aim of these strikes, he said in an interview Sunday, is “to fuel … an information operation as part of the broader confrontation with Russia.”

However, as has been stated numerous times by the Russians, as well as this news service, these strikes are being done with the direct assistance of European governments, putting Europe in the crosshairs of a war which is becoming increasingly defined by terrorist strikes against civilian infrastructure. This is being accompanied by a growing drumbeat across the mainstream media in the West, egging on Ukraine and its supporters to pour even more into the war against Russia—despite Ukraine’s losing of the war and lack of people left to fight.

As is obvious, mankind is on the precipice of disaster—not because of any of the details within Southwest Asia or Ukraine, nor even because of the individuals in the Trump administration, as disastrous as they are. Rather, these are the geopolitical land mines that were set by the British Empire over the past 50 years, using their agents such as Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and others, that prevent the global powers from finding a common paradigm of cooperation. The recent upsurge of popular political action in the wake of the genocide in Gaza, the war in Iran, and the flagrant crackdown on free speech and other guaranteed rights by citizens across the world, is indicative of a situation ripe for rejecting the failed status quo. The recent elections in New York state, and the upset victories by so-called socialist candidates who merely told the truth about some of these issues, is a case in point. But what replaces the dying and failed system?

Now is the time for a true citizens movement that uplifts the level of outlook that has tolerated these crimes and accepted this condition of the world. We are now only days away from the July 4 celebration of the anniversary of America’s Declaration of Independence—an occasion for Americans and citizens around the world to reflect on the principles that launched a fight against empire 250 years ago. That fight is not settled today. Will we live up to the challenge?


“Sitting on the Absolute Edge of the Abyss”

Report on Meeting of the International Peace Coalition, Week 160

by EIR staff

June 26—The 160th consecutive weekly session of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) focused on the war danger, which remains grave, but also on economic issues which are closely related. Schiller Institute founder and IPC initiator Helga Zepp-LaRouche began by saying, “The world is sitting on the absolute edge of the abyss.” An important obstacle to peace is that “You cannot trust one word which is being uttered by the so-called leaders of the collective West.” She commented on a “not-so-subtle shift” in what is coming from Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who has stated recently that the Anglosphere is going for complete dominance and wants no obstacles to their continued extraction of resources from the rest of the world. The United States, and President Donald Trump in particular, he said, has stopped trying to be an honest broker in the relationship between Russia and Ukraine, as had been discussed in his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaksa in Aug. 2025. If that is true, Lavrov said, the suspicion would be that Anchorage was just a ploy to buy time for Ukraine, and “…keep Ukraine as a launching pad for the fighting against Russia.”

The West is going for an unparalleled military build-up as their economies are collapsing. The Prime Ministers of Canada, Mark Carney, and Luxembourg, Luc Frieden, with their call for the creation of the Defence, Security and Resilience Bank (DSRB) are openly calling for a return to the policies of Hitlerʼs Finance Minister Hjalmar Schacht in order to finance the build-up. To end this insanity, the nations of the West must declare their willingness to cooperate with the global majority, and “they would be received with open arms” by the new institutions which have emerged.

A video interview with Mossi Raz, former Israeli Member of Knesset and former Director General of Peace Now, conducted by EIR’s Gerald Belsky. Raz commented on the recent letter by former Israeli officials, demanding the eradication of “Jewish terrorism” in the occupied West Bank. He agreed that the inaction of Israeli security forces is dangerous. Raz supports a two-state solution for Israel-Palestine; neither side is going to leave, so there must be some form of economic cooperation. Most Israelis are unaware that this potential exists. Youth are unaware of even the initiative that has been put forward by the Arab League. Most think that Arabs only want to kill them.

Dr. Taylor Haynes, National President of the Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) and former Republican candidate for Governor of Wyoming, said that he is fighting on two fronts: as a rancher, he opposes the big 4 meatpackers who control 85% of the meatpacking in the U.S. and are consolidating control over distribution of food. And he is informing people in his region about the detrimental effects of wind farms and other measures being imposed in the name of fighting climate change.

He said that “the geopolitical thing is above my pay grade” because his information comes from agenda-driven media.

In response, Zepp-LaRouche mentioned a new German book called “Truth Complex” (Der Wahrheitskomplex) which describes how narrative control has been imposed throughout the West, using artificial intelligence (AI) to suppress any dissenting viewpoints.

Co-moderator Dennis Small responded that in Mexico, the National Front for the Protection of the Countryside opposes Mexicoʼs basic grains being controlled by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the largest derivatives trading organization in the world, whose speculation threatens the continued existence of Mexican farmers and their ability to feed the population.

Haynes asked in reply, why would anyone allow their food source to be managed by an exchange in another country which has nothing to do with production?

Moderator Anastasia Battle had just returned from the 2026 World Youth Development Forum in Wuhan, China, which discussed concrete solutions to poverty and food scarcity, where US Schiller Institute president, Megan Dobrodt and herself spoke. It issued a declaration of support for peace through economic development. There was a thoughtful discussion of AI, with some speakers saying that “AI has speed, you have soul—co-create with it.” Human creativity involves a “leap of faith” of which AI is incapable of doing.

Battle reported the focus on “People-centered sustainable development” as the key to lifting hundreds of millions of Chinese out of poverty. Some of the conference participants had the opportunity to visit the Three Gorges Dam, where they learned of China’s successful stewardship of the Yangtze River. This dam provides electricity for 300 million people! It calmed the river which quite often would flood and destroy lives in the region. The Chinese have been actively working on preserving and reviving the plant, animal and cultural life along the river. Even celebrating a beloved poet Qu Yuan for the dragon boat festival. At one point there were only 10 Chinese sturgeons left, but now their number has grown to 300,000. Contrary to the claims of Western environmentalists, development does not equal destruction.

Larry Johnson, former CIA intelligence official and a member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), warned that the Russia-Ukraine conflict is more dangerous than the one in Iran and the Persian Gulf, in terms of possible escalation to nuclear war. The Russians have reached the end of their patience. Whatever agreements were reached in Anchorage are dead. Russia is making rapid advances in the war. Unlike Operation Barbarossa (Nazi Germany’s invasion of the Soviet Union, launched on June 22, 1941) which caught Russia by surprise, this time Russia is prepared.

Johnson noted that countries around the world are drawing down their strategic reserves of petroleum. Diesel and aviation fuel are approaching critical shortages. The Strait of Hormuz is not open—claims that it is open are a lie.

Zepp-LaRouche replied that the worst-case scenario would be one where a military escalation coincides with a blow-out of the financial system. The elites are unwilling to change any failed policies, preferring to control the narrative and exclude any discussion of an alternative policy.

Johnson observed that Russia and China are both calling for a new security architecture in the Persian Gulf, and Pakistan has assumed a leading role, assisting China in diplomacy. BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization are supplanting U.S. influence in the region. Commenting on the result of Tuesday’s U.S. primary elections, he said, “The toxicity of the language of these Zionists is a reflection of how much trouble they’re in…we’re witnessing the decline of the influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.”

Co-moderator Dennis Small appealed for financial support so that the IPC can have another 160 meetings. As an example of the IPC’s effectiveness, he cited the case of a Spanish Bishop who received one of the letters sent by an activist who reported on this in last week’s IPC meeting. The Bishop sent a reply, in which he agreed emphatically with what we are doing, and said that it is consonant with what the Pope is striving for.

Discussion

Zepp-LaRouche warned that you cannot underestimate the amount of intelligence warfare being deployed, combined with narrative control and the perennial “divide and conquer” tactic. This is the reason that the peace movement is not united. This is something we must outwit and outflank.

In response to a participant who asked why only China and Russia have embraced the concept of a credit system as expressed in the U.S. Constitution, co-moderator Dennis Small replied that any nation that attempts to adopt such a system is picking a fight with the most powerful and dangerous forces in the world. For a credit system to work, it must be insulated from the forces of financial speculation which will seek to divert the credit issued away from physical production and into feeding their bubbles.

In concluding remarks, Dr. Haynes vowed that he will continue his activities on social media, despite the shadow-bans and other obstacles, and by intervening in public events whenever the opportunity presents itself, presenting the facts calmly.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche warned that we are “in for a very stormy next several months.” We must be realists with respect to the danger, but also eternal optimists. The global majority represents 80% of humanity, and they are headed in a useful direction. Humans, as she emphasizes in the 10th of her “Ten Principles of a New International Security and Development Architecture”, are essentially good; evil is caused by a lack of development, and can be overcome through development. Commenting on the role of American Pope Leo XIV, she said, “This Pope is a gift from Heaven,” she said, and we should use his encyclical “Magnifica Humanitas as “a tremendous weapon.”


Radio Television Serbia Broadcasts Report on Berlin Schiller Institute Conference

June 24, 2026 (EIRNS)—In the morning program of national Radio Television Serbia (RTS) on June 22, editor Dr. Jasminka Simić presented a 4-minute video report on the conference of the Schiller Institute in Berlin, Germany on May 30–31, 2026, where she was a featured speaker.

Simić’s report, which highlights several of the 24 speakers of the two-day conference on the urgent need to establish a new global security and development architecture, identified the importance of Lyndon LaRouche’s historical strategic perspective for today: “When American President Nixon replaced fixed exchange rates with flexible exchange rates in the summer of 1971, American economist and founder of the Schiller Institute, Lyndon LaRouche, predicted that the continuation of the liberal course would necessarily lead to a new systemic crisis, depression, and the threat of war, unless a completely different economic system is implemented.”

At the conference, representatives of Asian countries pointed out the necessity of development, strengthening a shared future, and equal benefits for all. Professor Zhang Weiwei, Director of the Chinese Institute at Fudan University in Shanghai: “And that is crucial, because the lives of the people are extremely important in Chinese philosophy. Whatever you do, politically, economically, socially, it must ultimately provide something tangible for the lives of the people, whether in a material or non-material sense.”

Pino Arlacchi, a former Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations, believes that fundamental changes are needed to renew the UN world organization. “African countries have been demanding this for a long time, because certain parameters and procedures are not the same as they were 80 years ago,” said Charles Onana, a political scientist from Cameroon: “Africa will be crucial for the survival of Western countries, including even the question of defense, because the resources are there, and not elsewhere.”

Jasminka Simić, scientific researcher and journalist for RTS, spoke about the great potential of AI for the socio-economic transformation and cooperation of the countries of the Global South.

Stop Geopolitical Confrontation

During the first panel, Helga Zepp-LaRouche, President and founder of the Schiller Institute accused the political elites of the West as bearing “responsibility for missing the unique historical opportunity of 1989—the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War—to establish a peaceful order for the 21st century. The Russian leadership acted generously by agreeing to the reunification of Germany, and even its membership in NATO—albeit on the condition that foreign troops must not be located on the territory of the former German Democratic Republic.”

Jacques Cheminade from France identified the “geopolitical logic, which, if we do not stop its course, threatens the destruction of humanity. We all know here that the architecture of peace, built through mutual development and security, represents the key to the urgent and necessary change.”

Lawyer and writer Wolfgang Bittner from Germany addressed the nature of Germany’s sovereignty, where 11 American military bases are located. “The Granting of Sovereignty to the Federal Republic of Germany on September 12, 1990 through the 2+4 Treaty on the reunification of the two Germanies was accompanied by treaties on troop stationing, membership in NATO, a military alliance with a permanent cooperation structure under the Pesco umbrella, as well as other comprehensive military and economic agreements under the jurisdiction of the European Union.”

In conclusion, Simić reports about the effort by Helga Zepp-LaRouche for a“World Citizens’ Movement” based on the concept of the “coincidence of opposites” established by the 15th-century German philosopher and mathematician Nicholas of Cusa. “This means that although we hold opposing views, we share the same challenges of modern society, from the pandemic to nuclear threats, which inextricably binds us to a new paradigm in international relations with the idea of human unity.”


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: The Magnificent Humanity at the Crossroads

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, June 24, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

This past month, two teams of human beings reached into the two ends of the universe at once. In the hills of southern China, the JUNO observatory—a 20,000-ton sphere of liquid scintillator, watched by more than 43,000 light-sensors, 650 meters underground—caught the near-weightless flicker of the neutrino, and in just 59 days of operation measured the laws governing that ghostly particle more precisely than all prior experiments of recent decades combined. In those same weeks, the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA collaboration published its latest catalog of gravitational waves: some 390 collisions of black holes and neutron stars have now been recorded—ripples in the fabric of spacetime itself, one of them traced to a merger more than three billion light-years away. A decade ago, we had detected exactly one.

Neither the neutrino nor the black hole can be seen, heard, or touched. They lie, as Lyndon LaRouche wrote in 2010, beyond the reach of the senses altogether: “In the very large, as the very small, the metrics of sense-perception can no longer claim authority over the principles which reside, essentially, in what Riemann points to as those extremes of our universe.” And it is precisely there, he added—”in nothing as much as those same extremes”—that the deepest laws of the universe must be sought. To discover them, humanity does not wait for biological evolution to provide us with better eyes; we build new senses. Our species is the only one we know of that reaches past its own senses to grasp the very large and the very small, and changes the universe by what we learn.

Let’s measure the present against that image of mankind.

In Switzerland, the first round of U.S.-Iran negotiations under the 14-point Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding concluded June 21 at the Bürgenstock resort, mediated by Qatar and Pakistan, with the U.S. and Iran not yet speaking directly. They agreed on a roadmap to a final deal within 60 days, a High-Level Committee to oversee it, and, most consequentially, a “de-confliction cell” to ensure the end of military operations in Lebanon—which Iran’s foreign minister called the “first real test” of the negotiations. That test is already underway: Israel refuses to leave southern Lebanon (and “nothing will change it,” Prime Minister Netanyahu insists), while Iran has tied the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to a genuine Lebanese ceasefire. The potential for peace is real, and fragile.

Even should it hold, the damage is done and spreading. By energy-market reckoning, some 15 million barrels per day of oil—and its energy equivalent in liquefied natural gas—will be missing from world supply well into 2027, depressing an economy already enmeshed in the “everything bubble” of leveraged debt and derivatives. The effects will be felt, as they so often do, by the poorest. The UN’s latest “Hunger Hotspots” report warns that hundreds of millions face deepening hunger even as food and humanitarian aid is slashed. The same species that built JUNO is told there will not be enough food.

That is the contradiction of this moment. The species that can read the collision of black holes three billion years gone is told, by the managers of a dying system, that it cannot afford to house its young, feed the hungry, or build a railway across a desert. It is a failure of policy, not a lack of capability. Helga Zepp-LaRouche identifies the greatest failing directly: the refusal to recognize the indivisible nature of security and economic development of all nations. What Iran is insisting upon for relatively helpless Lebanon, and through Lebanon for the whole of the Global South, is what Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical Magnifica Humanitas states for all mankind—that no people may climb to heaven on a tower built by kicking the ladder away from the poor, as we said yesterday.

The Pope titled that encyclical “Magnificent Humanity.” The neutrino detector and the gravitational-wave catalog are examples of what that means—a fact about the creature said to be made in the image of the Creator, unlike any beast. Civilization organized around that truth would treat the development of every nation as the natural extension of the same creative power that built JUNO. A civilization that denies that truth of human nature, makes war on reservoirs and lets hundreds of millions go hungry.

Which of these we become is up to us. The decision is being made now, in the negotiating rooms at Lucerne, on the 60-day clock running toward a final deal, at this Friday’s International Peace Coalition mobilization, and in the streets of the nation soon to celebrate its 250th birthday. Let it be a celebration of what was once, and can be again, the great anti-colonial republic of the United States—a celebration led by LaRouche Presidential candidate Diane Sare, who will be holding an event in Philadelphia on July 5, joined by the irrepressible Congressional candidate Jose Vega.

The universe yields its deepest principles to those that reach for its extremes.


How the World Looks, After the Signing of the U.S.-Iran MOU

June 19, 2026 (EIRNS)—The 159th consecutive weekly online meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) took place at the end of an historic week, two days after the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the U.S. and Iran had been signed. Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Schiller Institute founder and IPC initiator, told the participants that “it is a great relief that the Memorandum of Understanding has been signed,” but that there are still “many possible booby traps” that remain. She asked, “What will Trump do if Israel does not adhere to the agreement?” She reiterated her proposed solution, that a development strategy centered on the Oasis Plan is required to provide a lasting basis for genuine peace.

The neocons’ desired “unipolar world,” dominated by the Anglosphere, has failed, Zepp-LaRouche announced. The nations of the Global South are no longer dependent upon the colonial powers; the rise of China gives them another option for economic ties. “The Chinese experiment is a wonderful success story,” she said. She placed great importance on Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical Magnifica Humanitas, which calls for a “civilization of love,” and recalled that the ancient Chinese philosopher Confucius wrote that “you can decide to feel love at will.” Zepp-LaRouche has just authored a statement titled “Urgent Appeal from Pope Leo XIV: ‘Stop! Repent! Before It’s Too Late!’ The New Name for Peace Is Development!”

Dr. Abdullah Ahsan is a professor of comparative civilization who has taught in Malaysia and Türkiye. He said that after reading the Pope’s statement, we must ask, “Is a civilization of love possible, or not?” Dr. Ahsan believes that it is. But there must be trust based on human dignity, and this will not be easily achieved. Israel challenged the MOU within hours by bombing Lebanon. Dr. Ahsan also called attention to the mistreatment of the Iranian soccer team, which is competing at the FIFA World Cup tournament in the U.S., but has been forced to leave the country immediately after each match, preventing planned recovery time, and must base itself in Tijuana, Mexico.

An excerpt was featured from a video interview by EIR’s Gerald Belsky with Dr. Mohammad A. Toor, chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Pakistani American Congress, and president of American Pakistani Physicians for Justice and Democracy. He discussed the importance of regional cooperation for economic development in order to create the foundation for peace. He specifically noted the possibility of now extending the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline, all the way through Pakistan and even into neighboring India.

An Inflection Point for Brazil

Luiz Erthal, editor-in-chief of the Brazilian newspaper Toda Palavra, said that the G7 summit “was an inflection point in Brazilian foreign policy.” He reported that Brazilian President Lula went to the meeting to make it clear to the largest economies of the world that they cannot ignore the development needs of the Global South. He went to meet U.S. President Donald Trump in a defiant, challenging posture, after Trump had endorsed the extreme right-wing candidacy of Flávio Bolsonaro, whom Trump managed to confuse with his brother, Eduardo, both sons of the jailed former President Jair Bolsonaro. Trump avoided Lula at the conference. Lula made it clear in France that Brazil will not tolerate foreign interference in its internal affairs. He said that Trump talks too much, and now he is going to have to listen. The countries of the Global South will not accept being isolated from China, a country that offers them a real opportunity for economic development.

On the question of more humane treatment for migrants, Erthal reported that Brazil has received more than 2 million immigrants, from countries such as Venezuela and Cuba, and is processing a growing number of claims for asylum. “Fortunately, Brazil has a welcoming attitude toward these people.”

LaRouche Organization activist Tim Rush offered a report from congressional office visits in Washington, D.C., where he and his team spoke on the issue of the attempted merger of the U.S., Israeli and British defense and intelligence establishments. This is the intent of Section 219 of this year’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). “This is an arm of something much bigger than Israel per se,” Rush said. The young staffers with whom they met were astonished by the discussion of great infrastructure projects that recall a time in American history of which they were unaware.

This report was followed by another video excerpt, this time from a Pakistani TV interview with Helga Zepp-LaRouche. She said that Trump himself had admitted that he had to make peace with Iran in order to avert a global economic calamity. In response to an interviewer’s question, she once again developed the ideas in the extended Oasis Plan.

At the conclusion of the presentations, Zepp-LaRouche reminded Americans that $2.2 trillion in taxpayer money was spent on the Afghanistan war, and the results were “pitiful.” A fraction of that money, spent on development, could have turned Afghanistan into a “blossoming nation.”

Discussion Highlights

Activists from around the planet shared their experiences in organizing for peace.

John Steinbach is a veteran anti-nuclear activist and the co-founder of the Hiroshima/Nagasaki Peace Committee of the National Capital Area. He offered a report on the recent vigil by his organization.

A Spanish Schiller Institute activist reported on a campaign to send letters to every bishop in Spain, recently visited by Pope Leo XIV, in support of the Schiller Institute’s peace proposals.

One participant sent in a question to Luiz Erthal regarding an effective means for combating drug trafficking while also respecting national sovereignty, as opposed to the U.S. approach. Erthal responded that Brazil’s Federal Police have been very effective in combating drugs, and that the U.S. should not use the “War on Drugs” as a cover for political purposes that violate other countries’ sovereignty. Instead, the U.S. should crack down on money laundering. In his concluding remarks, Erthal saluted the 250th anniversary of the American Revolution, which helped to inspire Brazilian independence.

In her concluding remarks, Zepp-LaRouche replied to a German participant who had referred to a divergence between technological advance and moral development in nations. She recalled the contributions of space pioneer Krafft Ehricke, who had served on the board of the Schiller Institute, and emphasized the importance of Schiller’s concept of Aesthetical Education.

She went on to contrast her late husband’s real-time assessment of the 9/11 attacks as having an “inside job” component, to recent statements by Palantir Technologies co-founder Peter Thiel, who praised the 9/11 catastrophe as a “Straussian moment,” a reference to Thiel’s 2003 essay by that name. Thiel insists that such “moments” represent a transitional phase where Western elites may use covert power to manage the world. As Zepp-LaRouche put it, they seek continual crises, which they exploit to stay in control. This defines the method of our opponents, which is necessary to understand in our campaign for lasting peace.


Iran Deal Can Become a Game-changer for the World!

by Helga Zepp-LaRouche


June 18—The following statement was released today by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder and leader of the Schiller Institute.

The signing of a memorandum of understanding between Washington and Tehran is definitely an historic breakthrough, ending hostilities between them, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and hopefully preventing in this way the further collapse of the world economy into a depression. The outcome of this war, which lasted more than three-and-a-half grueling months, is a significantly changed strategic situation, where it is not yet decided whether the truce can be transformed into a lasting peace, or will only have been a pause until the next, and possibly worse, round of fighting erupts.

What is clear, however, is the fact that the largest military power on Earth, the United States, was unable to defeat a medium-sized power, Iran. Neither regime change, nor the neutralization of its ballistic missile system, nor the elimination of Iran’s nuclear program was accomplished, due to the unexpected resilience of the Iranian population which, irrespective of the government’s current policies, united around its identity as the ancient civilizational state of thousands of years—Persia! Iran, while suffering significant losses, nevertheless is the clear winner of this war, not least since it has discovered the significant reach it has with control over the Strait of Hormuz. This control over one of the choke-points of the world economy has now become a factor in the strategic situation, which nobody can afford to ignore. Moreover, the fact that Iran was able to demonstrate the inability of the United States to defend those Gulf states hosting U.S. bases, will have permanent consequences for the security architecture of Southwest Asia.

High praise definitely goes primarily to Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who was crucial in the mediation between the United States and Iran, and in defending diplomacy over war as a method of conflict resolution, as well as to many other forces of the region attempting to avoid escalation into a global catastrophe.

Obviously, the big Damocles sword hanging over the situation is the reaction by Israel, the other big loser in the situation. Even with a second war within a year and backed by the strongest military power, Israel was unable to accomplish any of its war aims. Prime Minister Netanyahu is currently under severe attack by opposition leaders, and even members of his own Cabinet, for his failure, while the big sticking point is that part of the new agreement provides for a ceasefire in Lebanon, which Israel totally rejects. But Israel will have to realize the changed international climate, in which the vast majority of world opinion has shifted, and even a growing majority of the American population thinks that the Israeli government has gone entirely too far in respect to the Palestinians and Iran.

President Trump is currently balancing his interests between his financial supporters, who favor an even harder line against Iran, the hawks in the Republican Party who want the whole deal to be decided in Congress so as to be able to block it, and Trump’s old MAGA base, whose support for him is dwindling, because they feel he has betrayed his election promises. With the midterm elections a few months away, Trump has to weigh his gains and losses.

So, what should be done to ensure that the agreement holds and lasting peace can be secured? The answer is, that a real vision of economic development for the entire region of Southwest Asia has to be seriously put on the agenda: the Extended Oasis Plan, proposed by the Schiller Institute. Only if all the populations of the countries of the region, especially the youth, have a perspective of ending the war forever, and building a bright and prosperous future, will there be an incentive for a lasting peace.1

The deeper answer to that question requires one to consider the larger strategic context of the promises to end all wars. Trump faces the deadline of the midterm elections. While the crisis in Southwest Asia has a history dating back thousands of years, and is multi-faceted and very complex, it must be seen, just as the Ukraine war and almost any other current conflict must be, as part of the overall geopolitical situation. That situation is characterized by the failed attempt of the Collective West dominated by the Anglosphere to establish a unipolar world dominance after the end of the Cold War. That attempt turned out to be very short-lived, since the combination of six NATO expansions to the East, breaking all promises not to do so, as well as the policies of regime change, color revolutions, unilateral sanctions, and interventionists wars produced an enormous blowback, especially among the countries of the Global South. They have not accepted the NATO narrative on all these events, but instead have recognized the obvious effort to revive an imperial and neocolonial order. Since the historically unprecedented rise of China enables the countries of the Global South, for the first time, to overcome 500 years of colonialism, they seek to establish a new economic order that will establish a more just and equal system for all.

Part of any conflict, therefore, is the dynamic in the background, whereby the West aims to maintain its dominance in the strategic situation and, as some politicians put it, to “ruin Russia” and to, at a minimum “contain China.” That, however, is only in the interest of the very few in the establishments of some Western countries, and not in the self-interest of the peoples of Europe and the United States.

As the recent war in Southwest Asia has demonstrated with undeniable clarity: The old world order, as it was established after the Second World War, and then again after the end of the Cold War, is disintegrating. It is therefore of the highest strategic importance to put a new international security and development architecture on the table, which must take into account the interest of every single country on the planet. The situation is comparable to the circumstances of the Peace of Westphalia, which ended 150 years of religious warfare in Europe, after the warring parties realized that, if the war were to continue, no one would be left alive to enjoy a victory. So they arrived at the realization that in order to have peace, one has to respect the interest of the other, and specifically, of All others!

There are several initiatives on the table already, which reflect an understanding that the international order urgently needs to be reorganized, such as the new White Paper of the Chinese State Council, “More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions,” which proposes an improvement of the international order based on the idea of a community of a shared future of mankind.
Coming from a very different background but arriving at essentially the same idea of the necessity of an urgent reform, is Pope Leo XIV. His just-issued new Encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas, not only criticizes the present tendencies to create a new “Tower of Babel,” but also provides a very substantive proposal on what principles a new system worthy of the magnificent human species must be established.2 This author has proposed ten principles, to be taken into consideration, on how such a new security and development architecture could be conceptualized.3

Therefore, one should not just comment on the agreement reached between the United States and Iran, speculating on whether the situation in Lebanon, and Israel’s refusal to accept its inclusion in the deal, will turn out to be the main factor leading to the failure of the agreement. If the Extended Oasis Plan is put on the agenda by several countries of the region, it can become the first step to bringing the whole world into a new paradigm, in which war is made obsolete as a means of conflict resolution—an existential matter in the era of thermonuclear weapons—and an equitable order is realized, which allows the well-being of all nations.


  1. Schiller Institute Oasis Plan webpage, https://schillerinstitute.com/the-oasis-plan-the-larouche-solution-for-southwest-asia/
  2. https://schillerinstitute.com/blog/2026/06/18/urgent-appeal-from-pope-leo-xiv-stop-repent-before-its-too-late-the-new-name-for-peace-is-development/
  3. https://schillerinstitute.com/blog/2022/11/30/ten-principles-of-a-new-international-security-and-development-architecture/

Urgent Appeal from Pope Leo XIV: ‘Stop! Repent! Before It’s Too Late!’ The New Name for Peace Is Development!

by Helga Zepp-LaRouche

June 17th 2026

Of all the important and urgent speeches delivered recently by politicians and experts from many countries with the aim of preventing the strategic situation from escalating into a catastrophe that would wipe out the human race, Pope Leo XIV’s intervention—with his encyclical Magnifica Humanitas (1) and the addresses he delivered during his recent trip to Spain (2)—is, in my best judgment, by far the most important. When historians later examine the question of what—hopefully—proved to be the decisive factor in bringing Western civilization, in the midst of a deep spiritual and cultural crisis, to change course, they will come upon the role played by the Pope, and the willingness of a sufficiently large number of believers and people of good will to take his words to heart and bring about a change in policy.

Without ever having to name the guilty parties, Pope Leo XIV defines with absolute clarity the structures of sin that today pose existential threats to humanity—structures whose concrete relevance everyone can recognize, and which must be urgently eliminated. At the same time, he indicates the way out of the crisis, which is within reach—namely, that people summon up the highest ideal of the Christian view of humanity, and put it into practice. Precisely because the mainstream media largely suppress these texts by the Pope, Christians and peace-loving people need to create a political climate in which no politician seeking re-election can afford to admit his or her ignorance of his writings and speeches. For that of course, as many people as possible must first not only read, but also study, this encyclical and these addresses.

At the very moment when the first multi-billionaire on the basis of an AI fiction declares himself the first trillionaire, this encyclical warns against a new Tower of Babel, in which a new form of idolatry pays homage to profit at the expense of the weak, a dehumanization that uses others as means, an age-old yet ever-renewed temptation that today comes cloaked in technology. And coinciding with the entry into force of the EU Migration Pact—which, as of June 12, will accelerate procedures for deporting refugees at the EU’s external borders and thus massively restrict the right to asylum—Pope Leo XIV counters with the Christian principles as to how the migration issue should be addressed.

When one considers the encyclical and the Popeʼs speeches in Spain together, they represent a complete reckoning with the entire political agenda of the liberal West, and do so with a clarity that should compel all politicians who have sworn an oath of office to serve the common good (above all, those whose parties bear the word “Christian” in their names) to completely reverse their policies.

Among the various aspects of these policies, all of which are building blocks of the new Tower of Babel, are the idolatry of profit at the expense of the poorest, the financial interests that fuel tensions and conflicts to keep the war industry up and running, and support for modern forms of slavery, where child labor is routine and the health of adolescents is sacrificed for the profit of an upper class whose consumption habits would once have been considered extravagant, while the poor lack the basic necessities. This also includes a new form of colonialism that enslaves not only people’s bodies, but also data and information about them—ranging from health records to epidemiological profiles, genetic charts, and demographic data.

In the encyclical, the Pope laments the “normalization of war” and recalls Pope Paul VI’s powerful 1965 address to the UN General Assembly: “Never again war! Never again war!” (3) Despite a deep desire for peace, Leo writes, the intervening 60 years have been marked by conflicts of astonishing brutality, claiming the lives of countless civilian and innocent victims, mass displacements, social destabilization, and long-lasting wounds. Today, he notes, we are witnessing an alarming paradigm shift in which rearmament and war are once again publicly promoted as instruments of international politics, while the ethical principles that would previously have opposed war are being systematically undermined. Desires for territorial expansion, which we thought had been overcome, are returning, and a disconcerting loss of historical memory is becoming apparent, as eyewitnesses to the Holocaust and World War II pass away. (No, this is not Russian President Vladimir Putin speaking, or Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, but Pope Leo XIV) And so, the Pope argues, war is being prepared for culturally through simplistic narratives and a “friend-or-foe” mindset, disinformation, and the instillation of fear.

Under the heading “Force without limits,” the Pope addresses the growth of the military-industrial complex: “The armaments industry, and countries that supply weapons, profit from a market that thrives precisely on conflicts. In this sense, there are also financial interests that contribute to fueling tensions in various regions of the world.” And further in section 194: “ In the past, recognition of the threat posed by weapons capable of destroying all of humanity had promoted paths toward détente and disarmament negotiations. Unfortunately, this approach has been left behind, and the evolution of nuclear arsenals—including the prospect of its “tactical” use—makes the use of such weapons seem less improbable.”

The encyclical observes that we live in a time of significant intellectual and cultural blindness, and that a form of historical nihilism fosters the illusion “that the atrocities of the 20th century cannot be repeated, that the atrocities of the twentieth century can never happen again. Yet, in reality, the same dynamics are re-emerging under new guises…. In many countries, including those in the Global South, increased military spending is presented as the only response to an uncertain future or perceived threats. Meanwhile, the real cost falls on the poorest, who see resources for healthcare, education and social services being reduced.”

Pope Leo quotes Pope Pius XI’s encyclical Quadragesimo Anno, which condemns the concentration of economic power in the hands of a few, and he refers to Pope Paul VI warning of the dangers of extraordinary scientific, technological, and economic progress if it is not does not go together with corresponding ethical and social progress.

This applies in particular to AI, whose assessment and critique is the main focus of the encyclical. Starting from the decades-long debate over whether computers might one day surpass human creativity, he explains the renewed discussion regarding AI:

“99. It is not possible to provide a single, comprehensive definition of AI. “What can be stated, however, is that we must avoid the misconception of equating this type of ‘intelligence’ with that of human beings. These systems merely imitate certain functions of human intelligence. In doing so, they often surpass human intelligence in speed and computational capacity, offering tangible benefits across many fields. Yet this power remains entirely tied to data processing. So-called artificial intelligences do not undergo experiences, do not possess a body, do not feel joy or pain, do not mature through relationships and do not know from within what love, work, friendship or responsibility mean. Nor do they have a moral conscience, since they do not judge good and evil, grasp the ultimate meaning of situations, or bear responsibility for consequences. They may imitate language, behavior and analytical skills, or even simulate empathy and understanding, but they do not understand what they produce, for they lack the affective, relational and spiritual perspective through which human beings grow in wisdom. Even when these tools are described as capable of ‘learning’, their way of doing so is different from that of a human person. It is not the experience of those who allow themselves to be shaped by life and grow over time through choices, mistakes, forgiveness and fidelity. Rather, it is a form of statistical adaptation based on data and feedback, which can be very effective, but does not imply inner growth.”

Pope Leo XIV argues from the perspective of the Augustinian tradition, according to which there need be no contradiction between faith and knowledge, and quotes Pope Francis, who “recognizes the importance of listening to scientific research and of encouraging a serious and honest debate among experts while welcoming a diversity of opinions.”

The Right To Not Have To Migrate

Less honest, however, according to the Italian newspaper La Veritá and the French Le Figaro, were the liberal media, which reportedly provided a rather incomplete account of the Pope’s speeches in Spain by only covering his calls to accept and integrate refugees, while omitting the parts where the Pope defended people’s right not to have to emigrate and emphasized the need to address the root causes of their fleeing.

In fact, Pope Leo XIV’s six-day trip to Spain, which took him to Madrid, Barcelona, Gran Canaria, and Tenerife, was an intervention of extraordinary historical significance. For even today, 87 years after the end of the Civil War, the political debate in Spain remains extremely polarized, and issues such as the role of the Church and migration are emotionally charged. In this context, the way in which Pope Leo elevated the migration issue to such a high level was very important in respect to Spain’s internal situation and also set a precedent for all of Europe. There could hardly be a greater contrast between the EU Migration Pact—which came into force on the very last day of the Pope’s trip—and the migration policy advocated by Pope Leo XIV. While the EU wants to get rid of people as quickly as possible and lock them up in so-called “reception camps”—which Pope Francis used to describe as “concentration camps” and which certainly resemble prisons—the Pope has a completely different, humane perspective on the problem. In his address to the Spanish Parliament, he emphasized:

“The affirmation of human dignity cannot remain abstract when so many people are forced to leave everything behind in search of peace, security, and a future. The tragic drama of migration also challenges the conscience of nations and the ethical foundation of the international order today. Numerous men, women, and children are forced, by often dramatic circumstances, to leave their communities and leave behind loved ones, histories, and ties. This reality goes beyond any purely demographic or economic analysis: it constitutes an eminently moral and legal issue. Wherever people are discriminated against because of their national, ethnic, religious or linguistic origin, or because of their economic or social status, the universal principle of the equal dignity of all human beings is seriously violated.” (4)

He then went on to quote from his encyclical Magnifica Humanitas:

“81. A litmus test for social justice today is the treatment of migrants, refugees and those forced to move due to poverty, violence, climate change and environmental disasters. The way a society treats them reveals whether its sense of justice is driven by fear or by the spirit of fraternity. Pope Francis urged us to see migrants not simply as a problem to be managed, but as a living image of the People of God on the move. [109] They are people with dignity, resources and dreams, who have the right to be treated with respect and to ask to become active members of the societies that welcome them. Social justice in this area entails at least two complementary commitments. On the one hand, this means protecting the rightful hopes of those forced to leave by ensuring safe and legal routes, dignified conditions for receiving them, and genuine pathways to integration. On the other hand, it means promoting the right to remain in one’s homeland in peace and security by addressing the root causes that force people to migrate, including those linked to economic injustices and the climate crisis. When these rights are respected, migration can become an opportunity for encounter and mutual enrichment among peoples.”

A Call to Action

Western governments are hereby called upon to take Pope Leo XIV’s urgent appeal as an opportunity to immediately undo the inhumane and, from an economic standpoint utterly incompetent, migration policy as formulated in the EU Migration Pact. Instead, cooperation on an equal footing with the nations of the Global South must be placed on the agenda, with a serious commitment to eliminating the root causes of migration.

The right “to remain in one’s own homeland in peace and security by addressing the root causes that force people to migrate” is relatively easy to implement if the political will is mustered to do so. What the nations of Africa, Asia, and Latin America need is a genuine industrial and agricultural development policy aimed at realizing their full potential for the benefit of their own populations. The Global South, which in reality represents the global majority of approximately 85 percent of humanity, is in the process of leaving behind 500 years of colonialism and implementing, above all in cooperation with China, infrastructure projects and investments in key technologies that will enable these nations to fully establish value chains within their own borders. Instead of clinging to an inhuman neo-colonialist mindset, the governments of Europe and the United States are called upon to immediately commit to international cooperation aimed at completely eradicating poverty and underdevelopment in all nations on this planet.

For example, by the year 2050, Africa will have a population of approximately 2.5 billion people—one billion more than today. This means that it is in the very best interest of both Africa and Europe to create one billion productive jobs on the African continent over the next 25 years. Even though most other regions of the world face negative demographic projections, effective programs to overcome poverty are necessary everywhere if social explosions between the billionaire class and the impoverished billions are to be prevented.

The Schiller Institute has worked out concrete development programs to this end as to how clearly defined investment programs in basic infrastructure, energy production and distribution, and communications can create the conditions necessary to industrialize the nations of the Global South, and how cooperation between the BRICS countries, the industrialized nations of the North, and developing countries with joint ventures can achieve the goal of addressing the root causes of migration. (5) (6)

This would fulfill the call of the encyclical Populorum Progressio, that true peace can only be achieved through social justice and the overcoming of global inequality, “whose injustice cries out to heaven.” This call by Pope Paul VI, in his encyclical—”Development is the new name for peace”—is the urgent imperative of the hour!

In his address to the Spanish Parliament, Pope Leo XIV called for precisely this form of international cooperation:

“No nation can face a challenge of this magnitude on its own. Therefore, a coordinated, supportive, and effective response is indispensable, one capable of guaranteeing protection, welcome, and real opportunities for integration to those who migrate. When the institutional response is accessible, just and coordinated, borders cease to be places of abandonment and can become spaces for the responsible protection of human dignity.” (4)

In his encyclical, which bears the title Magnifica Humanitas—”Magnificent Humanity”—a title that can certainly be regarded as programmatic, the Pope refers quite specifically to the highest ideal of classical Greek thought, thereby following the Augustinian idea that the harmony between that thought and Christian revelation means there need be no contradiction between faith and knowledge. “23. The Church regards all who sincerely seek “truth, goodness and beauty” as companions on the journey, and considers them as “precious allies” in defending the dignity of every person and in caring for creation,” he writes. In accordance with this ideal of “the True, the Good, and the Beautiful,” the encyclical defines art and culture—when they are authentic—as a protective wall against the “normalization of evil.” And how necessary this is for contemporary human society, in which phenomena that can ultimately only be described as satanic seem to dominate nearly the entire so-called entertainment world. Pope Leo attributes an “almost prophetic value” to certain works of art, such as Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, describing them as a “desire for unity.”

Perhaps the most important idea is that Pope Leo, in memory of Pope Paul VI, calls for the creation of a “civilization of love”:

“Today, we must resolutely recover this vision, for the civilization of love is no naïve utopia, but a demanding project, which consists in translating charity into structures of justice, giving institutional form to fraternity and regarding others—whether individuals or peoples—as allies necessary for building the common good. As the Encyclical Letter Fratelli tutti reminded us, only this social love is capable of becoming a culture and a norm, and thereby of bringing about a stable international order, transforming mere armed coexistence into a community with a shared future.” [186]

It should give pause to all people in the nations of the so-called Collective West—that is, people living in a system dominated by liberal values, which has produced both the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the EU Migration Pact as responses to the refugee crisis —that both the head of the Catholic Church and the Chinese government have reached essentially the same conclusion: that the only a conception of the One humanity as a community of shared destiny can be the basis for peace.

The encyclical Magnifica Humanitas is Pope Leo XIV’s urgent call for change. The Schiller Institute’s development programs show a concrete path to overcoming the refugee crisis. What humanity needs now is a movement to promote the idea: “Development is the new name for peace”!

Notes

1. https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html

2. Pope in Canary Islands: Remain united through the Cross and the Eucharist—Vatican News

3. https://holyseemission.org/contents/statements/address-of-the-holy-father-paul-vi-to-the-united-nations-organization.php; https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2025-10/never-again-war-pope-paul-vi-s-unheeded-but-ever-relevant-cry.html

4. https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/speeches/2026/giugno/documents/20260608-spagna-parlamento.html

5. https://cloud.schillermeet.de/s/BQZXjgHWf78MJW5?dir=/&editing=false&openfile=true;

6. https://schillerinstitute.com/blog/2024/11/24/report-development-drive-means-billions-of-new-jobs-no-refugees-no-war/


What Kind of Peace Do We Seek?

June 12—The International Peace Coalition (IPC) held its 158th consecutive weekly meeting on June 12 titled, “What Kind of Peace Do We Seek?” Helga Zepp-LaRouche, the founder of the IPC and the Schiller Institute, began the event by challenging the participants with the idea that our actions today will decide whether the world will move in a good or bad direction. She said that U.S. President Donald Trump has now announced the 38th or 39th peace deal with Iran that is “just around the corner,” but the downing of a U.S. Apache helicopter has triggered new fighting. Zepp-LaRouche said that Trumpʼs idea that the United States will take total control of Iranʼs oil and gas is “ludicrous.” Self-described “U.S Secretary of War,” Pete Hegseth, has warned that the United States will “negotiate with bombs,” but Iran remains in a dominant position in the region.

In Europe, Zepp-LaRouche warned, many leaders are promoting a military buildup, but U.S. Air Force General Alexus Grynkewich, the NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe, has said that Russia is not looking for a conflict. Other military leaders have warned that Europe is “sleepwalking into war,” as the EU tries to expand from 27 member nations to 40. Zepp-LaRouche warned that the German military is highly visible with recruitment drives and events such as air shows.

Magnifica Humanitas vs. the Tower of Babel

In opposition to the warmongers, said Zepp-LaRouche, Pope Leo XIV is an important voice for peace, equal to Chinaʼs President Xi Jinping. The Pope recently visited Spain, speaking to the Parliament in Madrid, addressing 600,000 youth, and, while in the Canary Islands, calling for a Christian response to the migrant crisis. On May 15, Pope Leo issued his encyclical entitled “Magnifica Humanitas: On Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence,” which Zepp-LaRouche urged everyone to read. While the Pope never mentions any names in this document, today’s flawed leaders are easily identified. The Pope criticizes those billionaires whose only concern is becoming trillionaires, and those who wish to build their “Tower of Babel.” He rejects class struggle and promotes the Chinese concept of “Li,” the idea of harmony in the world. The encyclical advocates for a classical idea of truth and beauty, and states that the new name for peace is development.

In celebration of the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the Pope will be awarded the 38th annual Liberty Medal by the Philadelphia-based National Constitution Center on July 3. He will deliver his acceptance speech from the Vatican via video, challenging Americans to look deeper into the true history and mission of the nation. Zepp-LaRouche contrasted this to the Ultimate Fighting Championship “UFC Freedom 250” cage-fighting event on the South Lawn of the White House on Sunday, June 14—Trump’s 80th birthday—a complete disgrace, contrary to every principle represented by the Declaration of Independence. This will all be addressed at the July 5 event in Philadelphia sponsored by Diane Sareʼs independent campaign for the 2028 U.S. presidential election.

Zepp-LaRouche confronted the false narrative imposed by the British, that the United States was created by “one atrocity after another.” The United States was created, she asserted, to end the rule by “blue bloods and monarchies.” She continued, the United States was established for the “common good,” where “all men are created equal,” with a commitment to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” However, this happiness is not banal, but the promotion of a fulfilling life. Benjamin Franklin worked with collaborators internationally to make the revolution a success. The British continued afterwards to undermine the new nation, later by promoting the U.S. Civil War on the side of the Confederacy, subverting the nation at every turn, with the mess that we now see. Zepp-LaRouche said that we need to bring back the true American revolutionary tradition.

The next speaker, Col. (ret.) Alain Corvez from France, said that the United States and Israel are acting like outlaw nations trying to impose their will on the world. He said that much of the world is opposed to this “supremacist” outlook. Iran is actively resisting this domination and is supported by many nations, including powerful nations such as China and Russia. President Trump, with his domestic support in “free fall” and difficulties in the U.S. midterm elections, finds himself being blocked on several fronts. Corvez said that the United States must realize that it is not the policeman of the world. He further warned that Israel may try to sabotage any peace arrangements.

Col. Corvez added that European leaders should agree to accept Russian resources and seek peace. Russia is a very big nation and does not need new territory. European leaders such as German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and French President Emmanuel Macron have failed and are disconnected from their populations. The European Union works against the interests of Europe and has lost most of its support. Because of their failures, these leaders need a confrontation with Russia as the only way to stay in power. Corvez said that Russia could easily deliver crushing blows to Ukraine, but has restrained itself.

On the Ground Report from Spain

Next, Spanish Schiller Institute activist María Josefa Rodríguez Hernández gave a report on her activities during the Pope’s visit to Spain. She said that her small but dynamic group held a Schiller Institute banner calling for the dialogue of civilizations and distributed an open letter to Pope Leo XIV by Helga Zepp-LaRouche. During the visit, the Pope reminded Spain of its leadership in uniting diverse populations using its School of Translators in Toledo under Alphonso the Wise in the late 1200s. Speaking to 600,000 Spanish youths, the Pope called on them to spark a new humanity and to do it with love. With its uncompromising stand on issues such as genocide in Gaza, Spain has challenged the legal order of the world. Speaking to both the Global North and Global South, the Pope said that we must invest in “our common home,” with education, research, and civil society. He spoke of the importance of Africa and our responsibility to eliminate poverty. Zepp-LaRouche responded to this report from Spain saying that the Pope’s intervention on the world is of the utmost importance and essential to peace. Corvez agreed, adding that we must consider the needs and concerns of others.

Father Harry J. Bury, an international peace activist, retired Catholic priest, and the founder of Twin Cities Nonviolent, said that world events made him heartbroken but hopeful. He said that the Pope’s encyclical reminded him of the importance of each individual person and the need to honor each person’s contribution to society. In order to attempt to justify violence, some people are identified as evil. But, he said, there are no evil people in the world, just people who need education. History shows us that violence does not lead to peace, and dropping bombs does not change people for the better. Father Bury blessed the Pope and Lyndon and Helga LaRouche.

A short video was shown by Ray McGovern—the former CIA analyst and co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)—who also spoke of the importance of the latest encyclical by the Pope and its call for forgiveness. McGovern praised the 1963 encyclical by Pope John XXIII, “Pacem in Terris,” which was used by President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev to foster peace. Kennedy used this encyclical to shape his June 10, 1963 “A Strategy of Peace” speech at American University, and Khrushchev later published Kennedyʼs speech in Pravda and Izvestia, two leading Soviet papers. McGovern said that the Pope had written that encyclical during that dangerous period of 1963, and that we are again in increasingly dangerous times.

Who Is Not Equal?

Diane Sare, the independent LaRouche candidate for U.S. President, thanked Helga Zepp-LaRouche for her earlier comments identifying the true history and role of the United States in the world. Sare rejected the false idea that the United States was created in order to give power to rich, White slaveholders. She argued that the founders clearly stated that “all men are created equal.” If this is not true, she asked, who is not equal?

Sare said that the recent elections showed that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is losing its control over U.S. elections. While AIPAC succeeded in defeating Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY), it was unable to stop many others, such as Congressman Ro Khanna (D-CA), or the Egyptian-American doctor running for Congress in the Trenton area of New Jersey, Dr. Adam Hamawy.

Americans, Sare said, especially young Americans, have had enough, and reject the recent drive in Congress to merge U.S. and Israeli intelligence—with former CIA head Mike Pompeo applauding the CIA’s strong partnership with the UK’s Secret Intelligence Service, MI6. She read deeply moving quotes from George Washingtonʼs 1796 Farewell Address, which called on Americans to “cultivate peace and harmony with all.” Washington further argued that a nation cannot be happy if it is not virtuous. Sare also read from Lyndon LaRoucheʼs 1998 article, “When Franklin Roosevelt Was Interrupted,” which asserts that the only legitimate role of the state is to enhance the individual. Later, Zepp-LaRouche added that the world has many forms of governments—but the question is whether a government improves the character of the individual; if it does, then it is a good government.

Dennis Small, Ibero-American editor for EIR magazine, asked a profound question about the nature of man, referring to Zepp-LaRoucheʼs 2022 Ten Principles, which states, “… that man is fundamentally good and capable to infinitely perfect the creativity of his mind and the beauty of his soul.” Pope Leo, during his visit to Spain, said, “The desire for goodness, beauty, and truth is rooted in the very DNA of humanity…. These are profound ideas that cannot be ignored.” Zepp-LaRouche answered by saying that Pope Leo has an affinity to Nicholas of Cusa, who said that all evil is a lack of development. Cusa, a 15th Century Cardinal, philosopher and scientist, criticized the static, Manichean idea that evil has a constant presence and that there is a permanent struggle between good and evil. Zepp-LaRouche later added that in the latest encyclical, the Pope does not mention any names, but puts his finger on every single structure of sin. This all points to the Epstein class, and gives us the ability to judge current history. She added that this encyclical is the moral corrective that the world needs and a tool not just for understanding the past, but also for acting in the present.


Page 1 of 32123...Last