Top Left Link Buttons

tobi

Author Archives

Sept. 4 EIR Roundtable: ‘An Alternative to War and Looting in the Americas’

On Sept. 4, the Executive Intelligence Review and the International Peace Coalition held a roundtable discussion on “An Alternative to War and Looting in the Americas,” which will be streamed live on YouTube in English, and broadcast on Zoom with simultaneous interpretation into Spanish, German, French and Italian.

List of speakers and topics:

Panel 1: 11:00 – 1:00

  1.  Helga Zepp-LaRouche (Germany), founder, Schiller Institute: A New International Security and Development Architecture to End War and Looting
  2. Roberto Amaral (Brazil), former Minister of Science and Technology in Lula’s first government (2003): The Future of Brazil: Science, Technology, Innovation and Sovereignty
  3. Gen. (ret.) Edwin Patterson Monsalve (Peru), Academic and professor of Geopolitics and Geostrategy: Peru’s Chancay Port and South America’s Development and Integration Networks
  4. Paulo Nogueira Batista, Jr. (Brazil), economist who was formerly the Executive Director in the IMF for Brazil and 10 other countries in Washington, DC, as well as co-founder and Vice President of the New Development Bank established by the BRICS: The New Monroe Doctrine and the US Claims to Uncontested Hegemony in the Western Hemisphere
  5. Prof. Zhang Weiwei (China), Professor of International Relations at Fudan University in Shanghai: China’s Role in the Development of the Global South
  6. Col. (ret.) Pedro Baños (Spain), geopolitical analyst: Why Spain Must Not Join NATO’s War Against Russia and Iran

Panel 2: 1:30 – 3:30

  1. Dennis Small (U.S.), EIR Ibero-American Director: South America’s Bioceanic Rail Corridor, a Century-Scale Planetary Transformation
  2. Donald Ramotar (Guyana), former President of Guyana (2011-2015): A Good Neighbor Policy Among the Nations of South America
  3. Sara Madueño de Vásquez (Peru), EIR bureau chief, Lima: The “Chancay Effect” on the Eve of the Pope’s Visit to Peru
  4. Estevão Damacena (Brazil), Schiller Institute youth movement: Brazil’s Physical Economic Vulnerabilities and How to Overcome Them  

Resisting the Depressive Effects of ‘Narrative Control’

International Peace Coalition, Week 169

by EIR staff

Aug. 28—The 169th consecutive weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) began with remarks by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, IPC initiator and Schiller Institute Founder. She acknowledged that after 169 weeks, the war danger is getting worse, but emphasized that solutions exist and we must win the political battle to implement them. In Ukraine, Britain and France are stoking the flames of conflict by introducing more high-tech weaponry, which increases the risk that Russia will treat them, and Britain in particular, as direct participants in the conflict, as Russian government Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova warned this week. In the Iran War, the United States has reached an impasse of sorts because of depletion of its arsenal.

Zepp-LaRouche has not yet reached a conclusion about the significance of the new “Mecca Alliance”—a trilateral mutual defense pact signed in Mecca on August 7 by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif—but it could possibly create an avenue for successful negotiation and a new regional security architecture, provided that it is combined with an economic development perspective such as the Oasis Plan. The Western economies are in a desperate situation, and the rearmament drive in Europe is “just so crazy,” particularly because there is an emphasis on the mass-production of weaponry which is technologically obsolete. The United States is now paying more in interest on its national debt than it pays for its stupendous military budget.

Dennis Small, Executive Intelligence Reviewʼs Ibero-American Intelligence Director, began by observing that President Donald Trump’s every campaign promise and prediction have been contradicted by reality, and recalled Lyndon LaRouche’s warning about the absolute folly of continuing failed economic policies. He recalled how current U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent played a key role in George Soros’ move to short the British Pound in 1992. He elaborated Bessent’s present gambit to use the Treasury’s trillion-dollar “rainy day” fund to buy back Treasury notes, and the defiant response of the financier community. We have reached a point where government debt and interest rates are both rising. Bessent is buying back long-term debt with short-term loans, which is accelerating us toward the precipice. Small also reviewed Bessent’s shrill demands that all nations should stop trading with Iran, which are likely to be rebuffed by all of Iran’s major trading partners, and concluded that this tactic will accelerate the development of a new security and development architecture that will supplant U.S. dominance.
Peter Kuznick, Professor of History and Director of the Nuclear Studies Institute at American University, in Washington, D.C., provided a video to explain the goals of his open letter to Pope Leo XIV, calling for an intervention by him to convene an emergency summit to prevent nuclear war. He is concerned that Trump’s “pathological narcissism” makes him vulnerable to pressure from those around him, to “break the taboo” against the use of nuclear weapons.

Zepp-LaRouche, in response, reminded participants that the drive for rearmament will be funded by cuts in entitlements, increasing the general misery and causing governments to further resort to war in order to divert attention from that, just as it did in the case of Germany under the Nazis.

Co-moderator Dennis Speed pointed out that the new interest bill for the U.S. government is now higher than the entire U.S. government budget in 1987. He then introduced Larry Johnson, former CIA intelligence official and a member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

Johnson said that the corruption in the United States and of Trump personally “makes the corruption in Ukraine look tame by comparison.” He called Bessent’s so called “D-Day sanctions” against Iran “a complete joke,” because Iran is in the process of withdrawing from the U.S.-dominated financial system. He ridiculed Trump’s claim that the Strait of Hormuz is open, and reviewed the impending crisis as the world runs out of diesel fuel, which is “the economic heart of economies.”

Zepp-LaRouche acknowledged again that the situation is grave, but reminded the participants that the problem is solvable and that we can draw upon historic traditions such as Confucianism in China, and the Peace of Westphalia in Europe. These traditions informed her composition of her Ten Principles.

Dennis Small pointed out that the only reason there is a problem with Social Security and other so-called “entitlements” is that Wall Street insists that it is “entitled” to have its desires take precedence over the well-being and very survival of the U.S. population. He reviewed the personal corruption of Trump, whose family made $2 billion last year in cryptocurrency speculation, but warned against a simple-minded assumption that this is the root of the problem. He insisted that such corruption is simply a symptom of the presently bloated and dying financial structure. He demanded, with LaRouche, a return to a fixed-rate currency exchange system; predictability is good for trade in physical goods and bad for speculation. We must also close to speculators the door of free convertibility of currencies.

Dennis Speed quoted Hannah Arendt on the consequences of a news media that is permeated with lies: the population is rendered impotent because it no longer believes in anything. In response, Zepp-LaRouche pointed out that the use of the word “narrative” indicates that truth is no longer considered to be a factor in news reporting. In its place, we have competing fairy tales concocted by various factions to further their respective agendas.

Throughout the meeting, various speakers noted that there is widespread speculation about the recent visits of CIA chief John Ratcliffe and Archbishop Paul Gallagher to Russia. Dennis Speed asked Johnson for his take on this topic. Johnson characterized most of the hot talk about this as “a load of crap.” He opined that Ukraine’s survival as a nation is now very much in question and it may not last to the end of the year.

Discussion

A German participant lamented the loss of Germany’s intellectual tradition, the “Land of Poets and Thinkers.” Zepp-LaRouche took the optimistic view that Germany has bounced back more than once from terrible dark ages, and it could happen again. She said that “the Europeans have allowed themselves to be de-rooted from their own cultural traditions,” unlike Asian nations that are bolstered by the positive elements in their 5,000-year history. Dennis Small responded with a bit of caustic sarcasm about the cultural development of Trump and present-day America.

Zepp-LaRouche returned to this topic in her concluding remarks, insisting that every person must mobilize his or her emotions to resist the depressive effects of “narrative control” and the degradation of culture.  The key to success in this struggle, she said, is the emotion of love.


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: The Debate Over Nuclear War Is Real

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, Sept. 2nd, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

On Day One of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization’s 26th annual heads of state summit in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan today, leaders representing 3.4 billion people, from the 10 member nations, along with leaders of 17 partner nations and guests, conferred in bilateral meetings on how to proceed for the betterment of the world, stopping war and want. Tomorrow will be plenary presentations and an expected Bishkek Declaration. The official theme of the event is: “25 years of the SCO: Together Toward Sustainable Peace, Development, and Prosperity.”

Meetings in Bishkek included Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Putin and Indian Prime Minister Modi. Turkish President Recep Erdogan and Putin. Xi Jinping and Kyrgyzstan President Sadr Japarov, who is hosting Xi on a state visit, discussing, among other things, infrastructure projects affecting connectivity in all Eurasia. Iran President Masoud Pezeshkian met with Putin, with Modi, and other leaders including Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. There were many leaders and meetings.

The preliminary reports coming out of the SCO confab show that the focus of the extraordinary number of consultations taking place reiterates the need for peace and diplomacy in the world, in direct rejection of the current hallmark positions of the collective West, which is that might-makes-right in both military and economic terms.

The United States, alongside Israel, after six months of making war on Iran, with no “victory,” resumed bombing over the weekend, hitting Iran’s Larak Island in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran then responded by targeted strikes on U.S. sites in Jordan and the UAE. The European war-making alignment continues its backing of Ukraine, extreme rearmament, and demonizing Russia, while the economy of Europe itself is in breakdown. EU defense ministers will meet in Ireland tomorrow, locked in this destructive mode.

But the most dramatic event of the day, is how the new economic warfare campaign launched by the United States against the world, in the name of harming Iran— “Operation Economic Outcast”—is already a non-starter after barely a week in progress. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced the U.S. policy Aug. 24, and reiterated it yesterday and today at the Group of 20 finance officials, who are meeting in North Carolina, preparatory to the G20 heads of state summit set for Florida this December. Bessent told AP Aug. 30, that nations must break off relations with Iran, and if they don’t, “This is going to be financial violence if we have to. We are showing people that we know who you are, you know who you are, and this has got to stop.”

The world responds. Today, Prime Minister Modi and Pres. Pezeshkian discussed how to increase the trade and economic relations between their two nations. This follows China having already stated it will not honor the Bessent decree.

Bessent is in a flight forward at the Ashville, NC gathering. Today he thanked the EU officials present for supporting the U.S. “Operation Economic Outcast,” while media say his other support is confined to the UK, Japan, and Bahrain. What the U.S. “Outcast” initiative has done is spotlight the pending blow-out of the entire dollar system. Bessent and Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh tried to fend off questions, by saying “growth” will allow handling of debt, and minimizing the U.S. $40 trillion government debt. When a reporter asked about why the U.S. is buying-back its own Treasury notes, Bessent deflected by saying, EU Central Bank head Mario Draghi did it in Europe. Japan did it bigger than anyone.

The immediate danger amid all this glaring Western decline, and Global Majority advance, is the recourse by some still in positions of power to resort to use of the “nuclear option” in warfare. It’s for the sane to sound the alarm in all possible ways.

Join those circulating the letter for an urgent world meeting, “Appeal to Pope Leo XIV To Organize a Global Leaders Summit To Address the Questions of Peace and Nuclear Disarmament.”

Join the dialogue on the alternative to war and breakdown. The EIR will co-host this Friday Sept. 4 an online Roundtable, “An Alternative to War and Looting in the Americas.” This event features speakers for a dialogue on the kinds of projects and approach also now raised at the Bishkek SCO summit, and Sept. 1-4 in Vladivostok at Russia’s Eastern Economic Forum. Sept. 12-13 in New Delhi, India will host the annual BRICS heads of state summit.


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: Are Bessent’s Sanctions D-Day for the U.S. Economy?

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, Aug, 26, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

On Thursday, Oct. 25, 1962, three days after President Kennedy announced the discovery of Soviet missiles in Cuba, Pope John XXIII went on Vatican Radio and asked the governments of the world to keep talking. The next morning Pravda carried the appeal, under the headline “Save Peace!” (or “Save the World!”) quoting him at length: let leaders “heed the anguished cry which, from every point of the earth, from innocent children to the aged, from individuals to communities, rises toward Heaven: peace! Peace!” The day after the Pravda report, Khrushchev proposed to Kennedy the exchange that ended the crisis.

Consider the present situation.

Gold has overtaken U.S. Treasuries as the single largest central bank reserve asset by market value. The 30-year Treasury yield touched a nineteen-year high. The Treasury doubled the size of its own bond buybacks, and the effect lasted only briefly. On Monday the Secretary of the Treasury announced an operation whose stated terms are that any entity facilitating Iranian money laundering “will be removed from the U.S. dollar system” and named gold as one of five sectors to be sanctioned. Three American officials told a reporter that 40 tankers crossed the Strait of Hormuz on Friday night, carrying 16 million barrels. That claim is difficult to reconcile with commercial vessel-tracking data, which showed far fewer recorded vessel transits.

What that costs is counted in people. The American labor force lost about 1.3 million of them in twelve months. That decline is especially striking in an aging country whose labor-force growth increasingly depends on immigration, especially as another million are to be struck from it by early 2027.

What is a human being for? “It is not the exertion of physical force by men which rules mankind,” Lyndon LaRouche wrote in 1994, in The Science of Physical Economy as the Platonic Epistemological Basis for All Branches of Human Knowledge, published in EIR. “Mankind is ruled by the force of ideas, by the interplay of those contending ideas which, acting through the minds of men, thus control the physical conduct of society.” And in the same essay, against every doctrine that sorts human beings into the useful and the disposable: “The human race is made up of nothing but individuals who share in common that spark of creative reason which defines all persons as in the image of the Creator.”

A million people removed from a labor force are not a statistic. They are a million minds a nation’s leadership has decided it does not require.

Archbishop Paul Gallagher, the Vatican’s Secretary for Relations with States, is in Moscow. He meets Sergey Lavrov Tuesday, Aug. 25, and Yuri Ushakov, President Putin’s foreign policy aide, the next day. An open letter released Aug. 19 asks Pope Leo XIV to convene the heads of state of the three principal nuclear powers, in the spirit of John XXIII’s appeal in 1962. Leo has already made the argument himself: on July 30, 2025, marking fifty years since the Helsinki Final Act, he called it essential “to persevere in dialogue, strengthen cooperation, and make diplomacy the preferred path.”

Will we “save peace” today?


Who Is Pushing for Nuclear War?

International Peace Coalition, Week 168

Aug. 21—On August 21 the International Peace Coalition (IPC) held its 168th consecutive weekly meeting which Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute and initiator of the IPC said may be our most important meeting ever. Two regional wars threaten to go out of control, and the use of tactical nuclear weapons is now a topic for casual discussion. This has been recently confirmed by former U.S. Congresswoman Majorie Taylor Greene who said that she is not guessing when she says that there is an open discussion in the Pentagon, or in the President Donald Trump administration, of using tactical nuclear weapons, but rather she knows from direct sources that this is a live discussion. Elbridge Colby, the so-called “U.S. Under Secretary of War for Policy,” has confirmed on the record that the Pentagon is re-examining U.S. nuclear employment guidance in order to give the President what he calls “rational nuclear options” in a regional conflict with Russia or China—and he maintains that, unlike U.S. Nuclear Posture Reviews, this does not need to be approved by Congress or even be made public.

Zepp-LaRouche said that President Trump should admit that he has lost the war in Iran, but instead he is vacillating between saying he is talking to the Iranians and saying there are no talks—most recently warning of crushing sanctions against Iran and any country working with them. However, Iran has survived 47 years of sanctions, and it is the United States which is bankrupt with the federal deficit now passing the $40 trillion mark. According to media reports, Iranian officials threatened to attack U.S. military bases in Europe if the U.S. intensifies the war. Israel continues the genocide in Gaza, but has been committing similar atrocities in the West Bank. But President Trump is unable or unwilling to control Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The fighting in Ukraine is also escalating, but all of these wars are a consequence of the economic crisis, and the desire by western countries to maintain the 500-year-old colonial system of looting. Zepp-LaRouche stressed the urgency to circulate the letter which appeals to Pope Leo XIV to intervene by calling for a summit of global leaders to address the need of peace and nuclear disarmament. At least two former heads of state have already signed the letter.

Ray McGovern, the retired CIA analyst and founding member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), said that he started the day this morning the same way he starts every morning—reading the news from EIR. He highly recommended that people read an article by Jason Ross. McGovern questioned how Elbridge Colby could even talk about changing official nuclear doctrines without first consulting with the Russians. McGovern said that he has been watching the Russians and the Soviets before them for over six decades, and said that the Russians are “an open book,” and make their nuclear policy crystal clear. Colby is “still wet behind the ears” with no experience and no understanding of what war is. McGovern used to brief Colbyʼs father on the Russians. Elbridge Colby wrote that he wants “nuclear superiority,” but McGovern said that this is not possible and that nobody will be superior in a nuclear war, which is why it is called “Mutually Assured Destruction.”

McGovern stressed that President Trump is not well physically nor psychologically and could lead the world into a nuclear war either deliberately, accidentally, or by responding to an Israeli “false flag” provocation. This Israeli instigation is how President Trump started the Iran War. Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz which is the equivalent of holding a nuclear weapon. Would Trump respond with a nuclear weapon? Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson recently spoke on the Judging Freedom podcast where he said that the U.S. military leadership would not allow Trump to use nuclear weapons. McGovern said that he prays that Wilkerson is correct, but that there is no assurance.

McGovern spoke of several near nuclear incidents such as in 1983 when Soviet Union radar indicated a missile attack, the Russian officer in charge [Lt. Col. Stanislav Petrov] refused to launch a counterattack, knowing that there was a technical problem with the radar system and that there was no threat. Another crisis in Nov. 1983 was averted when the CIAʼs Mel Goodman—with whom McGovern said he was proud to work on Soviet foreign policy—bypassed all his superiors and went directly to CIA Director Bill Casey to warn that the White House had to stop ongoing western military exercises which were misunderstood in Moscow to be an attack on the Soviet Union. A third possible incident occurred when President Nixon had been drinking heavily and Kissinger warned military leaders that Nixon was inebriated and should he give orders to launch a nuclear strike the military leaders should first check with Kissinger. McGovern said that we are currently facing a level of danger that he has not seen since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, and he again put the biggest concern on President Trumpʼs mental state.

Jack Gilroy, a leader in Pax Christi, spoke of the growing circulation of the letter calling on Pope Leo XIV to bring world leaders together to address the need for peace and nuclear disarmament. Gilroy said that the Pope is seen as a moral leader and is respected by people of all faiths. In the past Gilroy could meet with his congressman, but recently the congressman has given excuses to cancel meetings and the last time the meeting was canceled because the congressman was on an AIPAC-sponsored trip to Israel.

Garland Nixon, the media personality and political analyst, said that the members of the European oligarchy are the most rabidly pro-war because they are hysterical about the end of the 500 years of colonialism and looting. The British always had the goal of controlling shipping choke points, but now the Houthis have more control than the British Navy. Nixon said that these oligarchs are angry, furious, and irrational at the fall of their colonial hierarchy. Nearly everybody calling into his show want to know how they can help.

Dennis Small said that the 500 years of colonial looting and the drive for nuclear war are the same issue. Elbridge Colby is married to the Brazilian Susana Cordeiro Guerra who is the Vice President at the World Bank for Latin America and the Caribbean. In Brazil Guerra was a protege of the Finance Minister Paulo Guedes, a former student of Milton Friedman and one of the looters of the “Chicago Boys” under President Jair Bolsonaro.

Donald Ramotar, former president of Guyana, said the several western countries are desperate to “turn back the clock” to keep the 500 years of colonialism alive.

Jose Vega spoke about his independent congressional campaign and the website TheTorresFile.com which documents the money and corruptions around Congressman Ritchie Torres (Democrat in New Yorkʼs 15th C.D., the Bronx). Moderator Anastasia Battle gave a report of a scheduled “Crusader” confrontation in Dearborn, Michigan between Christian Nationalists and the large Arab community, however, activists and faith leaders from many denominations came out to defend the community and peaceful unity.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche closed the event stressing that “We are all in one boat,” one humanity. We need to promote the Extended Oasis Plan to end the cycle of violence and educate 30 to 50 percent of the population and join with the Global Majority. The world wants peace and stability, not wars and genocide. In recent weeks military leaders warned that we are sleepwalking into another 1914 war crisis. We must circulate the letter to every institution and every thinking person. (sac)


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: U.S. War Hawks Push Option to Use Tactical Nukes

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, Aug, 19, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has caused a firestorm by posting on X that she is not speculating when she says that President Trump is contemplating nuclear strikes on Iran.

In a post which has now over five million views, MTG said, “They are discussing using nuclear weapons on Iran in strategy meetings. Yes you read that correctly. It’s real. I’m not speculating, I know. And it’s pure evil.”

White House spokesman Davis Ingle was quick to respond, telling USA Today: “Marjorie ‘Quitter’ Greene has no idea what she is talking about…She is completely out of the loop and should quit spreading Fake News.”

Honesty has not been a strong trait of the Trump administration’s foreign policy, but rather than speculate, given the massive destructive potential of nuclear weapons, every person should mobilize to ensure that a nuclear weapon is not used. Not in Iran and not anywhere else.

Retired German General Harald Kujat, who had been Chairman of the NATO Military Committee two decades ago, had said that the great fear of the Soviet Union, now the Russian Federation, was a Cuban Missile Crisis in reverse. Worse than that, the Russian leadership must know that even before the end of WWII, Britain’s alcoholic Prime Minister Winston Churchill was already contemplating a nuclear first strike against the then Soviet Union.

If one looks at the arc of history from the dropping of the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which had more to do with threatening Russia than defeating Japan (which had already been defeated), the world has been moving in the direction of nuclear war with a few brief exceptional periods.

The great American statesman and former presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche warned in 2011, when Muammar Gaddafi was brutally murdered in the streets, that this was preparatory to a war with Russia.

That march toward nuclear war with Russia has been pushed by the Anglo-Zionist Epstein-class billionaires behind successive American presidencies from Barack Obama to Donald Trump’s second term.

The stakes are even higher today because their multi-quadrillion-dollar bubble of speculative obligations is nearing the end of its sustainability. People who think nothing of raping and shooting children at short range will not shy away from using a nuclear weapon. As far as they are concerned, they have two highly compatible objectives:

1. Reduce the world’s population

2. Maintain their monetarist financial dictatorship

The problem they have is that human beings are not animals. As the great poet of freedom, Friedrich Schiller said in his play “Wilhelm Tell,” “There is a limit to a tyrant’s power.” Billions of people in the nations of the BRICS-plus, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the Organization of African Unity, to name a few, reject the old colonial order. They do not believe that might makes right.

China has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, and India celebrated 79 years of independence from the British Empire on August 15th.

The way to avoid a thermonuclear Armageddon is for the nations of the West, in particular the United States, to recognize that they have a shared future with the entirety of mankind.

There will soon be a second letter to Pope Leo, signed by prominent peace activists, political leaders, military analysts and others, asking him to convene an emergency international peace conference. It is indeed fortuitous that the leader of the Catholic Church comes from the United States, and that he is a profound thinker familiar with the writings of Nicholas of Cusa.

Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche has convened an International Peace Coalition that has become an important meeting place for the adults in the room, as South Africa’s former Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor has said. On September 4th, the IPC will also host an EIR Roundtable: An Alternative to War and Looting in the Americas.

LaRouche congressional candidate Jose Vega is leading a national fight against the Epstein elite by targeting one of their lead ducks, Richie Torres in the Bronx. Long-time LaRouche associate independent presidential candidate Diane Sare has become a spokesperson for an appropriate presidential policy, as reflected in her interview prominently featured in TASS.

On September 11th, the Schiller Institute NYC Chorus will bring the poetry of Schiller to life with a performance of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony and the Brahms Naenie on the 25th anniversary of the September 11th attacks.

We have the evil-doers surrounded! Join us and support our work.


Youth Class Series # 4:The Anti-entropic Science of Vernadsky and LaRouche

In this final presentation of the youth class series, we explore the foundational question of human purpose within the universe. Discover how human thought functions as the most powerful geological force on Earth, why human history and evolution are inherently anti-entropic, and how creative scientific discovery drives true physical economic progress.


U.S. War Machine Is Overextended, but the Empire Wonʼt Go Quietly

Report on International Peace Coalition, Week 167

by EIR Staff

Aug. 14—The 167th consecutive weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) began with remarks by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Schiller Institute founder and IPC initiator. She warned that the idea is unrealistic that the Anglophile Empire, and with it the United States, will peacefully go out of business, as the Soviet Union did. The Iran war “is lost for the United States”; it did not achieve its goal of regime change, and it has depleted its stockpile of weapons. U.S. President Donald Trump does not seem to have found a face-saving way out. The new “Mecca Alliance” of Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Türkiye is significant, because the constituent nations are all formerly close partners of the United States. The regional situation remains very complex, and “still has the potential of expanding into a global nuclear war.”

The Ukraine war continues to be “a situation of utmost tension,” where the barbarism becomes worse by the day. In Panama, the United States proclaimed its dominance of the Western Hemisphere, in a clear violation of the intent of the Monroe Doctrine. Zepp-LaRouche expressed her hope that China’s Global Governance Initiative will be discussed next month in the United Nations General Assembly.

Richard Anderson Falk is professor emeritus of international law at Princeton University, Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor’s chairman of the board of trustees, and former United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories (2008 to 2014). He said he wished to emphasize a point raised by Zepp-LaRouche, the difference between the way the USSR went peacefully out of business, and the bellicose thrashing of the Anglo-Americans. He pointed out that the genocide in Gaza has been very profitable for the U.S. arms industry, and the private sector is putting pressure on the U.S. government with “exaggerated security threats and security interests.”

He also called attention to the “era of finance capital,” in which profits take precedence over production and the national interest, and asserted that this is fueling the bellicose foreign policy of the United States. “The Western efforts to wage colonial wars … have not produced a political victory; the weaker side, militarily, has been prevailing.” “The encouraging obsolescence of military power” is being challenged by the private sector which makes money regardless of whether wars are won, or lost.

The Iranians have learned that “trust doesn’t work with the West,” after the United States launched a war of choice, twice, in the midst of diplomatic negotiations. The inability of the U.S. to stop this madness is only partially explicable by the “personality and style of Trump”; we must also look at the deeper, structural issues. Referring to the Mecca Alliance, he said that if it goes forward, and engages more countries, we will soon be talking of “West Asia” rather than the “Middle East,” explaining that the latter is a European-oriented term, whereas the former is how the Global South and Asian countries think of the region.

Neo-Feudalism: The New Stage of Imperialism

In response, Zepp-LaRouche said that the concept of “capitalism or imperialism” has reached a new stage. “The concept of the sovereign state is practically annulled”; the billionaire class is now calling the shots, and we now have “neo-feudalism.” Nations which have attempted to negotiate in good faith with the United States are now concluding that the U.S. cannot be trusted.

Co-moderator Dennis Speed asked Falk to comment on the “privatization of war,” and the claims of one British academic that we have returned to the “Palmerston era,” referring to mid-19th-Century British Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary Lord Palmerston. In response, Falk observed that today’s situation is different, due to technological changes. Also, with the founding of the UN, there was an effort to move away from the Hobbesian anarchy of “might makes right” and toward a Westphalian world order, but the effort was flawed and allowed the dominant players to put their thumbs on the scales. Consequently, the UN Security Council today has enabled the crimes of the neocons against Gaza and Iran.

Zepp-LaRouche said that efforts to remedy this situation are hindered by mainstream media, which present “a narrative which is completely counter to reality.”

Ulf Sandmark, president of the Schiller Institute in Sweden, reported on weekly demonstrations there with which they have “attempted to break the spell” of making a taboo of advocacy of diplomatic solutions instead of war. In Sweden, the political parties are squeezing out antiwar politicians, who are also excluded from media coverage. The Schiller Institute is including these politicians in its demonstrations and giving them a voice.

Larry Johnson, former CIA intelligence official and a member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), noted that Russia has moved from conducting its Special Military Operation in Ukraine, to all-out war. One manifestation of this has been the total shutdown of maritime activity in the Black Sea, which will be devastating for Ukraine. He listed numerous other developments in Russia’s conduct of the war, and compared it to the war in Iran, stating that both wars highlight the “delusional nature” of U.S. policy. Trump proclaims that the Strait of Hormuz is open and “under our control.” If that is the case, why are we running a blockade? The painful economic consequences of the war are completely divorced from the fantasy world of Wall Street, which can make money regardless.

The U.S. military is in trouble, on two fronts: It does not have access to the rare earths and other raw materials required to replenish depleted stocks of armaments; China has almost monopolistic control over those rare earths. Secondly, “the military across the board is in a mental health crisis.” There has been a wave of suicides and other deaths related to deteriorating morale and psychological stress among military personnel. The reports of deaths aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln have significantly underestimated the number of casualties. There will be a political response from the angry parents of the affected servicemen.

A ‘Crony Capitalist Monster’

Johnson said that the U.S. military is not the greatest or most powerful military in the world, but it is the most expensive. He cited the astronomical costs of U.S. aircraft and drones, many of which have been destroyed in the war with Iran. He commented on the “profit collaboration” between the military and the private sector. Although “fascism” is a term perhaps too “emotionally charged” to describe it, he characterized this collaboration as a “crony capitalist monster.” Russia and China, operating on military budgets which are tiny in comparison, have achieved greater technical results.

Zepp-LaRouche returned to what Pope Leo XIV calls a “new Tower of Babel.” Peter Thiel, founder of the Silicon Valley tech firm Palantir Technologies, said that members of the billionaire class should not be shy about flaunting their wealth and power. The privation endured by U.S. military personnel stands out by comparison.

Co-moderator Dennis Small reminded the participants that the “military-industrial complex” should be called the “military-industrial-financial complex,” because, as EIR has shown, the largest arms manufacturers in the United States are owned by the leading financial speculators. This, he said, is the Achilles’ heel of the war machine.

Numerous speakers referred to the recent manic activity by so-called “U.S. Deputy Secretary of War” Elbridge Andrew Colby, who has been making the rounds and issuing public comments about U.S. dominance in Asia and the Western Hemisphere, in addition to promoting the use of nuclear weapons.

Daisuke Kotegawa, former official in the Japanese Ministry of Finance, former Japanese executive director at the IMF, and research director at the Canon Institute in Tokyo, submitted a video on the topic of immigration, which he said became a problem for Europe only after the U.S. invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the sabotage of development plans for Africa. He also noted that the population of Ukraine has declined from 40 to 30 million due to the war there.

Discussion

In response to a question from an African participant, Zepp-LaRouche asserted that colonialism still exists, although typically Europeans are in denial. She said that the IMF exemplifies the new structures of colonialism.

Another participant posed a question about the Oasis Plan, which has been discussed on a regular basis at IPC meetings. Zepp-LaRouche replied that the only thing required would be a commitment by a number of Southwest Asian nations. She speculated that the new Mecca Alliance might be a prospect for this. A “devil’s advocate” asked her whether it was time to reevaluate the tenth of her Ten Principles, the assertion that humans are fundamentally good. Her response was an emphatic no; the current degraded culture cannot be seen as the last word on human nature. We have a long history to consider, and the net improvements in the human condition teach us that humans are essentially good. A dark age can always be overcome by a new renaissance.


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: Tectonic Shifts and the Science of a New Paradigm

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, Aug, 12, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

Helga Zepp-LaRouche’s closing remarks to IPC #166:

Well, I think the crucial question was posed by you, Jack, earlier in your remarks, when you said we have to look for moral leaders. Because answering the question of the nun from Spain, I think the letter you have composed, Jack, with the letter to the Pope going through Archbishop Wester, but then basically making that a rallying point for everybody. I think that that points to the right way to go for the highest possible solution, which would be moral leadership from the Pope and to get together the three leaders of the most powerful nations in the world. That is China, the United States, and Russia. And that way, you have something to rally everybody around.

Because the problem is, and I agree with what Scott Ritter had to say about that you cannot be happy that the Anglo-American empire is clearly in a decline, because I have said many times, and I believe that deeply, that while the Soviet Union disintegrated peacefully in 1991, I do not think that the Anglo-American empire will dismantle itself as peacefully. I think that when they have the feeling that they are at the point of demise, exactly what Scott was pointing to, the danger of the use of nuclear weapons becomes the most acute.

So therefore, the question is, what can we do under the circumstances? The main problem we have is that the masses of people in the collective West, which is not so collective anymore, are either complacent, indifferent, just not informed, or too fearful to act. So, we have to do something which catalyzes emotion in those people. And I think the idea that if everybody contributes, no matter where they come from, let them come from a Catholic background, and there we have a lot to do, because the Catholic churches are not everywhere against the war. …

But in any case, it has to come from the religions, not only the Christian religions, but we should branch out to essentially all religions of goodwill, all people of goodwill. And then at the same time, basically say an ecumenical approach, which stretches the word ecumenical beyond religion, to include people who are concerned with the well-being of humanity. And that happens to include China, for example, because if you look at the record of China in the last 40, 50 years, having transformed 850 million people of their own country from total poverty to now basically being the most wealthy, prosperous country in the world. … Then you have many others. We should think about what method to use. It cannot be violence. It cannot, in any case, add to the already escalated level of violence in the world on all levels, from school shootings to the level of aggressive wars.

So, we need to go back to the theories of Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, except that we do not need armed resistance for the reason of nonviolence, which I just mentioned.

But it needs to also appeal to that, and that is what this beautiful nun from Spain said, this internal better quality of man where man is the living image of God, imago viva Dei. Because if we do not evoke that absolute precious element within each human being, which does separate us from all other creatures. People can love their pets, and there’s something very beautiful in pets, but it is only the human being being in the image of God, the Creator, which makes us creative. And that is what is so precious and what is in danger of being trampled upon and eradicated with all this violence, pornography, perversion, and all of these things which are satanic in our present environment.

So, it comes to the question of elevating people, ennobling people, appealing to that which makes them participate in the eternal chain of human generations, where each of us has the absolute obligation to contribute something to make the next generations live more rich and better in wisdom, in creativity, in having access to the beauty of this universe, than the previous generations.

We have to appeal to that love for mankind. I believe that without evoking love for mankind, we will not succeed. So, I can only ask all of the participants and listeners of this discussion, take this letter to Archbishop Wester, get it around, get the program, this time we will have the entire program of the IPC as a video, get it around so that people can listen to the arguments, what we are fighting against, the danger of extinction, the memory of Hiroshima, the parallels in the present, the dangerous situation we are in, the demands of this changing world situation which does require that each of us act and not sit on the fence of history.

So, if everybody would start to become an organizer appealing to the Pope, the Pope would be surrounded by an ever more powerful chorus of voices from Africa, from Latin America, from Europe, from Asia, all demanding that he takes this role. And I’m sure that Putin would react exactly like Khrushchev did. And I think that Xi Jinping would also listen. And I think then we could convince President Trump, who set out in his second term, to bring better relations with Russia and China, that he still could do that. And hopefully, we will move the world into a secure domain.

Watch full IPC here


Hiroshima Day –This Does Not Have to Happen Again

Report on IPC #166

The 166th consecutive weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) took place on August 7, 2026—81 years after the August 6th and 9th, days in 1945 when the world’s first use of nuclear weapons laid waste to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, killing at least 110,000 civilians, with many more dying later from the impact of the radiation. With the U.S. President Donald Trump Administration now openly “revising” its nuclear doctrine, making the use of nuclear weapons more likely in the proposed wars with Russia and China, the appropriate title of the event was “The Art of Reversing Our Criminal Course.”

Helga Zepp-LaRouche, the initiator of the IPC and the founder of the Schiller Institute, opened the event, noting that we are closer to a nuclear war than at any time in history, including the time of the October 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. She noted that there are no international arms control treaties left in existence; the international trust among nations and parties, even among so-called allies, has completely broken down and the old order no longer exists. In that context, for there to be a discussion by the so-called “U.S. Deputy Secretary of War” Elbridge Colby, as reported by NBC News, that the Pentagon is considering revising its nuclear doctrine to move away from deterrence towards nuclear war fighting—at a time when there are already two regional conflicts, in Ukraine and Southwest Asia, with the potential for the use of nuclear weapons and there is the rising danger that other nations may decide they need to acquire nuclear weapons—is incomprehensible! She noted that Iran has not only survived but defeated the most powerful military power in the world, the United States, which is backed by a strong military power, Israel. Despite Trump’s protests, the West is running out of munitions to fight forever wars. The signing of a military agreement between Saudi Arabia, Turkey (a member of NATO), and Pakistan (a nuclear power state) demonstrates the dramatic shifts taking place across the region. A new global architecture assuring both security and development for all nations is required, with justice for all, if these wars are to be stopped and no new wars are to be launched, she said.

Behind this crisis is the now over two quadrillion dollars in debt imposed on the trans-Atlantic economies, which is being addressed not by constructing a new system, but by returning to the methods of Hjalmar Schacht, Adolf Hitlerʼs president of the German Reichsbank and Minister of Economics from 1933 to 1937—diverting all available credit away from the real economy into military production and war-fighting. Underlying all of this is the Malthusian mentality of depopulation, as demonstrated by the recent call by the Sustainable Development Magazine calling for reducing the world’s population by half—to less than four billion by 2200.

The first speaker was Dr. Akiko Mikamo, the author of the book “8:15 A True Story of Survival and Forgiveness from Hiroshima,” now reprinted under the title “The Hiroshima Boy,” and producer of the documentary “8:15 Hiroshima, From Father to Daughter,” which describes in vivid detail the impact and the suffering of her father and mother, who were both in the death zone of the Hiroshima atomic bombing, but survived. She said that the annual event in Hiroshima commemorating the Aug 6, 1945 event this year saw 127 countries send representatives, while events were held around the world. She described the events, with pictures of the destruction of buildings and people. She said her father, Shinji Mikamo, refused to simply blame the United States, but blamed war. She closed by noting that people often respond to being harmed or being fearful, by striking out—which is also used to justify war. This is an endless cycle, she said, “which must be broken.”

Dr. Theodore Postol, professor emeritus of Science, Technology, and International Security at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a world expert on the impact of nuclear weapons, began by comparing Acting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to Adolf Hitler near the end of World War II. He said, if Hitler had admitted defeat after Operation Bagration (June 1944)—when the Russian troops had destroyed within 3 weeks 28 of 32 German army divisions in Byelorussia and were at the Polish border, and it was clear that the war was over for Germany—the lives of 2-3 million Germans could have been spared. So, also with Zelenskyy today, who refuses to admit defeat.

On the proposed new U.S. nuclear doctrine, Dr. Postol said neither side could win a nuclear war, but could only unleash global destruction. He noted that he had warned that President Joe Biden’s administration had approved a few years ago the development of “super-fuses” for its “prompt strike” nuclear weapons, which by dramatically improving the targeting accuracy of the warheads, doubles the killing power per warhead against very hard targets—which, he said, would allow the use of lower yield nuclear warheads to destroy Russian nuclear missiles in their silos. The war hawks today may imagine the same now, but there is no such thing as a “tactical” nuclear weapon. He warns that many otherwise intelligent scientists don’t understand, and argue they can go ahead to “win” a nuclear war.

Dr. Postol added that proliferation is also a serious danger. Iran, he said, is being told by the United States openly that they are threatening to destroy Iran’s society and culture. In that light, Iran may believe that only building a nuclear weapon can prevent it. Iran is not likely to try, but they could build one if pressed to do so by upgrading their 60% enriched uranium. However, Iran could, with only its current armaments, virtually destroy the small state of Israel, and such an operation would leave Israel also in an existential crisis, which could lead to their own use of nuclear weapons.

Even the Saudis are worried about an Iranian bomb, while they also believe they can no longer rely on the United States to defend them, and are therefore reconsidering their own nuclear weapon plans. Acquisition of nuclear weapons may also be being considered by the Japanese, the South Koreans and Taiwan, Dr. Postol worried, due to their consideration of China’s nuclear weapons.

Helga responded that China is the only nation with a plan similar to her own Ten Principles of a New International Security and Development Architecture, referring to Chinaʼs Four Global Initiatives for development, security, civilization and governance.

Dr. Postol agreed. He also noted that the United States has had two presidents: Biden had essentially forced Russia to do what they did not want to do, in their attack on Ukraine, and Trump who started (together with Israel) an unprovoked war of aggression against Iran. We should be thankful, he said, that, like Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin is rational, which is our best hope that neither would use nuclear weapons.

Moderator Dennis Speed asked Dr. Postol about the 1946 U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey, which concluded that Japan would have surrendered even if the U.S. had not dropped the bomb, even if Russia had not threated to enter the war against Japan, and even if the U.S. had not threatened to invade.

Dr. Postol said that he believed the United States was planning to invade, estimating that millions of Americans and many millions of Japanese would die, and thus they decided to drop the bomb, believing that would save more lives that they would through an invasion. He added that whether it was right or wrong, it was done, and the horror of the result must serve to help prevent it even happening again.

This provoked a discussion amongst the participants, in particular from Zepp-LaRouche on the absolute lack of needed use of nuclear weapons, as Japan was prepared to surrender. Further discussion will be had.

John Steinbach, of the Washington based Hiroshima and Nagasaki Committee described the makeup of the 1946 U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey as essentially being the view of the Joint Chiefs of Staff—which included many members who were against the use of the bomb. But, Hap Arnold, who Steinbach said was an asset of President Truman, and was the only one in favor of using the bomb, won the argument. He also described the process by which scientists Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard approached Franklin Roosevelt explaining to him that a nuclear weapon was possible with the newly discovered principles of nuclear technology, and that Germany was trying to build such a device, and that the Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb was necessary. However, when it was discovered that the Germans were not able to do this, rather than dropping the project, the target was switched to Japan.

Jack Gilroy described the open letter he and the IPC and the Schiller Institute had prepared to send to Archbishop John Wester, of Santa Fe, New Mexico, To Urge Pope Leo XIV to Call for a Peace Conference, as Pope John XXIII had done in 1962 at the urging of President John Kennedy and his associates to stop the Cuban Missile Crisis. Gilroy called on the moderator Anastasia Battle to read the letter, which she did.

The discussion period was based on a letter sent in by Sister Paz (“peace” in Spanish), a nun in Spain, about how to deal with the darkness coming from the financial and military oligarchy, suggesting that only the Infinite can answer that question. John Steinbach and Dr. Postol basically said “Amen.” Helga Zepp LaRouche called for the letter drafted by Jack Gilroy to the Pope to serve as a rallying point for people worldwide to focus attention on both the danger and the solution, to follow the lead of Mahatma Ghandi, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela, and act Imago viva Dei.

[mob]


Page 1 of 34123...Last