Top Left Link Buttons

tobi

Author Archives

Live with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: So, You Wish to Learn Statecraft?, Nov 12 2025, 11am ET/5pm CET

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions, comments, and reports to questions@schillerinstitute.org or post them in the next live stream.

“The content of policy is the method by which it is made.” That was the idea of statecraft espoused by Lyndon LaRouche, founder of Executive Intelligence Review and co-founder of the Schiller Institute. The question of method in statecraft was the topic of a two-day-plus conference just concluded by the Schiller Institute in Paris. The conference, led by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute, and by Jacques Cheminade, former French Presidential candidate and president of Solidarité et Progrès (Solidarity and Progress), was titled “Emancipation of Africa and the Global Majority, A Challenge for Europe.”

Why, despite the increasing potential for thermonuclear war between NATO and Russia; despite the mounting panic regarding the looming financial meltdown of the hopelessly bankrupt trans-Atlantic system; despite the depopulation of Gaza, and the destruction ongoing in Sudan and several other locations—why was it the self-development of the African continent which was chosen in Paris as the focus of deliberation for the international participants, many of them young people, including from several African nations?

To understand this, contrast two speeches given on Nov. 9. One was by the President of Germany, Frank-Walter Steinmeier. The other was by Schiller Institute founder and chairwoman, Helga Zepp-LaRouche. Under the guise of commemorating “the significance of the date Nov. 9 in German history—in 1918 (abdication of German Kaiser and proclamation of the Weimar Republic), 1938 (beginning of the Kristallnacht/”Night of the Broken Glass” violence against Germany’s Jewish population and their various establishments), and 1989 (fall of the Berlin Wall), German President Steinmeier chose to stoke fear, claiming that there had been a rise of antisemitism since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel. His remarks led to calls for constitutional bans on emerging German political parties and other forms of censorship—the politics of fear.

Fortunately for current history, there are people that actually understand the role of the Classical artist in universal history, and therefore the role of poet Friedrich Schiller in Germany—including in the events of Nov. 9, 1989. Instead of the politics of fear, Helga Zepp-LaRouche, speaking to an audience in Paris, invoked the life, the work and living presence of the poet Friedrich Schiller.

“I can only advise you to read Schiller. Schiller, apart from LaRouche and Cusa and Plato and some others, but Schiller is one of the most important, because he came to the conclusion that in his time, people were already barbaric. He said, why is it that we are still barbarians? He said the most important task of our time—meaning his time—is to develop the Empfindungsvermögen. I have never found a good English translation, because if you just say ‘compassion,’ or ‘empathy,’ it does not quite capture it. What Schiller meant with Empfindungsvermögen is that you have to be able to educate your soul and your mind in such a way that you are able to absorb the world in an all-encompassing manner and feel compassion with the whole world; which means everything. It doesn’t just mean pity or empathy with people who are suffering; it also means to be able to always take in whatever is happening in the world, in your heart and your mind. It’s still not capturing it entirely, but it’s larger than the word empathy.…”

This is the idea that must immediately become the basis and the method of international policy. This is the soul of the idea of “promoting the General Welfare” contained in the United States Constitution’s Preamble.

Schiller, born on November 10, 1759, besides being a great historian and dramatist, was also Germany’s greatest poet. The Ninth Symphony of composer Ludwig van Beethoven is a setting of the spirit and a portion of the text of Schiller’s poem, An Die Freude (Ode To Joy). During the great transformation of 1989 that would culminate in the sudden, miraculous Nov. 9 fall, “by the consent of the governed,” of the Berlin Wall, which had stood for more than 27 years at the most lethal checkpoint in the world, the Ninth Symphony was not “the soundtrack of the revolution. “ The Ninth Symphony—the whole composition, not just its Fourth Movement—was the embodiment of the idea of Hope, hope for a better humanity that chooses, as did those who brought down the Berlin Wall, to deserve that freedom which is, according to the American Declaration of Independence, “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.”

The right to self-development, particularly for youth, such as the still-living children of Gaza, the 600 million African youth today under the age of 19, and the 1.2 billion African youth under the age of 25 who will be here in 25 years, is the policy; Schiller’s mission, for humanity to develop the Empfindungsvermögen required for such self-development, is the method by which that policy would be made. Guaranteeing that right through establishing a new international security and development architecture, discussed by Zepp-LaRouche in her Ten Principles, and a vigorous campaign worldwide by youth, for that purpose, including in work in national electoral and other processes as appropriate, is the immediate task before us.


Zepp-LaRouche: ‘A New International Youth Movement Is More Urgent Than Ever

Nov. 9, 2025 (EIRNS)—Creating an international youth movement organized around the seminal ideas of Lyndon H. LaRouche was the central subject of the second day of the Nov. 8-9 Paris conference, co-sponsored by the Schiller Institute and France’s Solidarity and Progress party. As the invitation to the event stated, the intense, day-long cadre school was designed “for the young and the most motivated among you. What is the physical economy and why should we study and teach it? What does a culture of life and discovery mean? How can we enable everyone to develop their creativity and use it as a tool for the common good? What could a culture of beauty and truth be?”

Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche had issued the challenge in her remarks a day earlier, on Nov. 8, at the beginning of the day’s third panel, whose theme was “Youth From Around the World for Peace and Mutual Development.”

“So, I think that the need to create a new international youth movement is more urgent than ever before,” Zepp-LaRouche began, “because it is very clear that we have reached, in terms of the long arc of history, that if we make it through this period, historians will look back and say this particular time was when the decision had to be made to change the system or not survive. Because never before in history was there a situation where all of civilization was at stake.”

She emphasized the central strategic issue: “As long as we keep this geopolitical confrontation between NATO on the one side, and Russia, China and possibly other countries, such as Iran and North Korea, we are sitting on a complete powder keg,” which could even bring the world to the brink of nuclear war.

“But if you look at the world as a whole, you don’t want to compete geopolitically for influence in Africa between the West and China. That’s exactly what you don’t want. What you want is a cooperative approach, including equal partners from African nations to do this.”

To address this crisis, Zepp-LaRouche explained, “what we are offering is a plan that we will build an international youth movement in Africa, and in as many countries as possible. That we will build youth movements everywhere we can, in Asia, in Latin America…. That then we will perfect this plan for the industrialization of Africa, and naturally likewise in Latin America. And then we go to the industries [in the West] and tell them these are the options where you should invest.”

Zepp-LaRouche explained that such an approach is in the interest of the so-called West, as well as the Global Majority. “If Europe would make the decision to industrialize Africa, together with China and maybe Russia, India, Indonesia, Japan, Brazil, it could be done. We could change the direction quickly.”

She concluded: “So that’s really my challenge to you, that you all join this movement, now, on the spot, and commit yourself to be part of it.”


Live – Nov 8/9 international conference: The Emancipation of Africa and the World Majority, A Challenge for Europe

On Saturday, November 8, in Paris, we invite you to an international gathering.

In this context, we invited representatives from a delegation of the International Schiller Institute.

Committed citizens and young people from around the world will then come to defend their vision of the world to come and their solutions for achieving peace, bringing with them the voices of Africa, the countries of the Global Majority, and every other nation fighting for the true emancipation of peoples, for peace, solidarity, and progress for all.

To achieve this, France’s true sovereignists must come together and unite their efforts to stop the war. By organizing a peace movement with sovereignists from other nations, patriots, and citizens of the world, we can build an architecture of mutual development and security, what Charles de Gaulle called “détente, entente, and cooperation.” This vital challenge will be at the heart of the debates during these days—defining a future for our country and for all of humanity.

Starting in the morning at 9:30 a.m. (CET) and continuing until 7:30 p.m. (CET), three round tables will be held to present the roadmap for this mobilization and discuss it with you.

The day before, on Friday, November 7, the General Assembly of the Solidarité & Progrès party will take place in Clichy (92).

On Sunday, November 9, we are organizing a “cadre school” to explore the topics discussed at Saturday’s conference in greater depth, followed by two days of activism in Paris and the surrounding region. It’s all about combining action and ideas !

We invite you to register now to be the first to know, when the time comes, the exact program and location of this conference and the events being organized around it.

And don’t hesitate to tell your friends and family about this event !

Saturday, November 8, 9:30 a.m. – 8:30 p.m., Paris 13th arrondissement

International conference with 3 round tables :

Public, open to all.

Panel 1 from 3.30 a.m. (ET)

Responding to the Cry of the People

Moderator :

  • Sébastien PERIMONY

Speakers :

  • Jacques CHEMINADE – President of Solidarity & Progress (France)
  • Our legislative candidates with Solidarity & Progress (France)
  • Jose Vega – Independent candidate FOR cONGRESS in the Bronx and member of the LaRouche Youth movement (United States)
  • Diane SARE – Activist with the LaRouche Organization. Former U.S. Senate candidate in New York State (United States)

Jacques Cheminade will call for mobilization against the military-financial occupation of France, alongside our legislative candidates and Diane Sare, former U.S. Senate candidate. In their speeches and during a Q&A session with the audience, they will address this essential question : How can we “respond to the cry of the people” and the ferment of mass strikes brewing today, in France and elsewhere ?

Panel 2 from 9 am (ET)

The Emancipation of Africa and the Global Majority, a Challenge for Europe

Musical Introduction : song Nkosi Sikelel’ iAfrika performed by the Schiller Institute choir

Moderator :

  • Sébastien PERIMONY

Speakers :

  • Helga Zepp-LaRouche – (Germany), Founder and Chair of the Schiller Institute: For A New World Economic Order based on the Coincidence of Opposites!
  • Princy MTHOMBENI (video) – Founder of Africa4Nuclear, Nuclear Energy Specialist (South Africa)
  • Filomène EBI N’GODO (video) – Doctor of History of International Relations Professor and Researcher at Alassane Ouattara University (Côte d’Ivoire)
  • Zenobita MAGANGA – Activist for peace and the cause of the Democratic Republic of Congo (Democratic Republic of Congo)
  • Dora MUANDA (video) – Advisor on Reforms, Pedagogical Innovations and Assessments, Ministry of National Education and New Citizenship (Democratic Republic of Congo)
  • Chekaraou Halidou Namaiwa (video) – Panafricanist (Niger)
  • Mariano Nguema ESONO MEDJA – Professor of International Relations at the National University of Equatorial Guinea (Equatorial Guinea)
  • Odile MOJON – Representative of the Schiller Institute (France)

Several of our international guests, leaders (politicians, historians, scientists), and our partners from the Schiller Institute will demonstrate how to envision the future and emancipation of Africa and the Global Majority, ensuring a radical change in the policies of Europe and the West. They will demonstrate how the latter must assume their responsibilities in building a new architecture of security and mutual development. An architecture that is taking shape today around the structures of win-win relationships embodied, among others, by the BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).

Panel 3 from 12.15 pm (ET) p.m.

Youth from around the world for peace and mutual development

Moderator :

  • Odile MOJON

Speakers :

  • Chérine Sultan – Representative of the Solidarity & Progress Party (France)
  • Carolina Dominguez – Representative of the Schiller Institute Youth Movement (Mexico)
  • Daniel Burke – Representative of the LaRouche Organization (United States)
  • Jonathan THRON – Representative of the Bueso (Germany)
  • Jose Vega – Independent candidate FOR cONGRESS in the Bronx and member of the LaRouche Youth movement (United States)
  • Megan Dobrodt – Representative of the Schiller Institute (United States)

In dialogue with our international guest and Jacques Cheminade.

Representatives and young activists from Solidarité & Progrès and the Schiller International Institute, hailing from several continents, will present their recruitment and training work to other young people, politicians, and institutional leaders in their respective countries. Whether they are candidates for election, researchers in the field of physical economics, or committed to promoting a dialogue among civilizations and a universal culture of discovery, their commitment to building a new economic system aimed at peace and the mutual development of peoples will be the common thread running through the final roundtable of our training and mobilization day. They will be invited to ask questions of the other speakers and answer questions from the audience, in a spirit of emulation and mutual understanding.

Evening from 8:15 PM to 9:00 PM : Musical moment

Concert

Artist introductions by Johanna CLERC, choir director of the Rebel Canto choir

  • Feride GILESBERG – Opera singer, Schiller Institute (Denmark)
  • Leena MALKKI – Opera singer (Sweden)

Sunday, November 9, 10 a.m. – 8:30 p.m., Clichy-la-Garenne

Political Training Day

Faced with the threat of a financial crash and nuclear war, Sunday will be devoted to political training to mobilize us. A “management school” for everyone. For the young and the most motivated among you. What is the physical economy and why should we study and teach it ? What does a culture of life and discovery mean ? How can we enable everyone to develop their creativity and use it as a tool for the common good ? What could a culture of beauty and truth be ? We will answer these questions through a series of presentations as well as several classical music recitals throughout the day. Lunch and coffee break included !

Panel 4 from 4 a.m. (ET)

Explain Lyndon LaRouche’s science of physical economics by exploring the concept of fundamental discovery through the scientific approach of great thinkers such as Pierre Fermat and Georg Cantor

  • International Guest
  • Sébastien DROCHON – Solidarity & Progress (France)
  • Yoan DELHOTAL – Solidarity & Progress (France)
  • Jason ROSS – LaRouche Organization (United States)
  • Benoît Odille – Solidarity & Progress (France)

Panel 5 from 7:30 am (ET)

Explore the true political and revolutionary nature of thought in art, culture, and history through the study of the works of great geniuses such as Rembrandt, Rabelais, Shakespeare, Schiller, and many others. Draw inspiration from Louis XI and Mazarin on the great principles they implemented to transform the course of history.

  • International Guest
  • Jacques CHEMINADE – Solidarity & Progress (France)
  • Karel VEREYCKEN – Solidarity & Progress (France)
  • Megan DOBRODT – Schiller Institute (United States)
  • Kynan THISLETHWAITE – Schiller Institute (United States)
  • Rémi LEBRUN – Solidarity & Progress (France)
  • Johanna CLERC – Solidarity & Progress (France)

Panel 6 from 12.30 pm (ET)

Experience beauty through classical musical works performed by our professional musicians and activists.

Artist introductions by Johanna CLERC, choir director of the Rebel Canto choir

  • Schiller Institute Choir – Schiller Institute International
  • Feride GILESBERG – Opera Singer, Schiller Institute (Denmark)
  • Leena MALKKI – Opera Singer (Sweden)
  • Georges BERIACHVILI – Pianist (Georgia)


EIR News Interviews Graham Fuller on the VIPS Warning to Trump About a Venezuela War

This interview was given to EIR News on November 7 2025. Subscribe to EIR News: https://eir.news/ for your daily updates and to EIR’s YouTube channel for the latest video updates and interviews: https://www.youtube.com/@EIR-LaRouche

Graham Fuller, a former US diplomat and CIA official, is a co-signer of a Nov. 5 Alert Memorandum to President Trump released by the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), which warns President Trump against plunging the U.S. into “a wider and/or `forever’ war” with Venezuela. EIR Ibero-American Editor Dennis Small interviewed Fuller on Nov. 7, noting the urgency of the issue, as the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier group is currently on its way across the Atlantic towards the Venezuelan coast, where it is expected to arrive Nov. 11—12.

Fuller explained the reason for the VIPS warning: “What’s going on here? Why, in the middle of an appalling genocidal war in Gaza,” is the Trump administration considering a new war? The VIPS statement is meant as “a warning shot across the bow to suggest we’re drifting into another of these classic scenarios of a war that seems relatively pointless, cannot possibly achieve anything, and ends up miring the U.S. in a true quagmire.”

Fuller emphasized that Russia, China and other nations of the Global South, such as the BRICS, no longer accept a world in which “the U.S. asserts its right to act with impunity.” A new paradigm of global relations is being demanded, and is needed. He stated that the U.S. “butting heads” with China and Russia is the wrong approach, and must give way to a change in the “potential nature of international relations… I want to emphasize, above all else, the question of human agency, which Helga Zepp-LaRouche has talked about… We’re not simply billiard balls on a table.” The U.S. has to change, Fuller concluded; above all “it’s a mind-set issue.”


Zepp-LaRouche Open Letter: Replicate Cusa’s Thinking and Initiate a New Renaissance for Our World Today

Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche issued an open letter on Nov. 5, calling for representatives of all religions and cultures around the world to start a dialogue to solve the strategic crises facing Mankind, inspired by Nicolaus of Cusa’s “coincidence of opposites” method of thinking, as recently emphasized by Pope Leo XIV in his Oct. 25 Jubilee Audience sermon. Zepp-LaRouche’s letter is followed by a packet of print and video documentary materials, including crucial writings on Cusa by Zepp-LaRouche and her late husband, Lyndon H. LaRouche.



Russia’s Concept of a Peace Order – Russia’s #2 UN diplomat interviewed by Helga Zepp-LaRouche

Join EIR News on our YouTube channel today, November 5, at 10am EST for a live interview of the Russian Federation’s First Deputy Permanent Representative at the United Nations, Dmitry Polyanskiy, conducted by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, editor-in-chief of EIR. 

The danger of nuclear extinction war has not abated, as Dr. Ted Postol of MIT showed in his October 24 comments to the International Peace Coalition. Nevertheless, a new paradigm of peace through development is shining through, as reflected in the circulation of the Bering Strait Tunnel project as a solution to the crisis in US-Russia relations, by Kirill Dmitriev, CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund. A representative of the RDIF participated in the October 22 EIR international roundtable discussion on the strategic implications of the Bering Strait Tunnel project, during which program Zepp-LaRouche shared her view:


“[T]he realization of the Bering Strait Tunnel is potentially and very likely the answer as to if we have war or peace. Because, if we get to an agreement between the two largest nuclear powers in the world, to replace confrontation with cooperation which is to the benefit not only of those two countries, but actually of all countries in the world, it can be the game changer which marks the departure from the present extremely dangerous moment in history.”

How does the Russian government view the strategic dynamic? What are the principles of the “polyphonic world order” advocated by Russian President Vladimir Putin? Join the program to learn more.

Subscribe, like, and share!




IPC #126 Report: Can the ‘Coincidence Of Opposites’ Method Stop the Headlong Rush to War?

The 126th consecutive weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition on Friday, Oct. 31, has placed the joint roles of Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) and Lyndon LaRouche (1922-2019), although separated by 500 years, at the center of the current battle to both stop the descent of civilization into suicidal global war, and to also unleash a new Renaissance based on a new architecture for security and development for all nations. This likening of the importance of Cusa and LaRouche was made in the course of discussion of today’s extreme dangers by Father Harry J. Bury, for 70 years a priest and a life-long peace advocate. He is active today with the Twin Cities Nonviolent and the U.S. Catholic Priest Association.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Schiller Institute founder and initiator of the International Peace Coalition, termed Father Bury’s remarks to the IPC as one of the most significant of our time. The transcript of Bury’s full statement is below.

It was one week earlier, on Oct. 25, that Pope Leo XIV had stunned the Catholic world—and many knowledgeable circles beyond—by delivering a five-minute allocution before 10,000 pilgrims in St. Peter’s Square for the Jubilee Audience. The Pope identified Cusa’s approach as critical to our current time in history, because his breakthrough concept of the “Coincidence of Opposites” calls for seeking and acting upon the common benefit, over and above any conflicting parties and perceived interests. Though “unseen,” this is the grounds for peace and hope. The transcript of the Pope’s message is in this issue of EIR. Zepp-LaRouche, in reporting about the Pope to the IPC, called his Oct. 25 speech, “a real, real breakthrough.”

Father Bury, an advocate of Lyndon LaRouche’s “peace through development” concepts, in particular the need for the LaRouche “Oasis Plan” approach to Palestine-Gaza, explained, “Nicholas of Cusa and Lyndon LaRouche were saying: we can all learn; we can all grow; we can all change. There is hope for the human race.”

Today’s Dangers

The dangers today—of nuclear war, Western militarism madness, economic breakdown—were touched upon in the opening remarks by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, and further elaborated in the five following reports from specialist speakers. Discussion followed, with questions from the hundreds in the audience, representing more than 30 nations.

Despite “rays of hope on the horizon,” including the Oct. 30 Trump-Xi summit, there are situations of extreme tension today, which Zepp-LaRouche reviewed. Some European governments are “psychotic.” She cited Belgian Defense Minister Theo Francken’s recent cavalier remarks about winning a war against Russia by “wiping Moscow off the map.” Turning to the economic crisis in the NATO states, she said, “The entire bottom of the German industry is falling out … the social consequences of this collapse will be enormous.”

Surveying the current hotspots, she insisted that no one is fooled by the fairy tale that Venezuela is governed by a drug cartel, and the planned attempt at a regime change war there “could lead to an explosion in all of Latin America.”

Regarding the Palestine-Israel crisis, Zepp-LaRouche noted the importance of the Gaza People’s Tribunal which took place last weekend in Istanbul, Türkiye. The Tribunal President is former UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories Richard Falk, who has briefed the IPC. Falk stresses that when states fail to address a great injustice, it is necessary to appeal to the consciences of the people. The Elders, a high-level group of former statespersons founded by Nelson Mandela, has called for Israel to release Palestinian political prisoner Marwan Barghouti, echoing the call which appeared in the January 5, 2024 issue of EIR.

Nuclear War Threat

Ray McGovern, former CIA analyst and co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), addressed the nuclear war danger head on. He recalled that it was neocon lunatic John Bolton who encouraged President George W. Bush to withdraw from the ABM Treaty in 2002. In the years which followed, the U.S. rebuffed all efforts by Russia to negotiate, while the West claimed that they were stationing missile systems in Eastern Europe because of an Iranian threat, which was actually non-existent.

Russian President Vladimir Putin responded with his famous speech at the 2007 Munich Security Conference, describing Russia’s development of new strategic weapons due to the U.S. scrapping of the arms control agreements. McGovern shared a video segment of a subsequent speech Putin gave in 2016 to Western journalists, in which he announced Russia’s intention to respond by developing new offensive weapons which cannot be intercepted; this was the genesis of the Oreshnik, Burevestnik, and Poseidon systems, which represent technological breakthroughs unmatched by anything that NATO possesses, and cannot be hindered by existing ABM systems.

Putin told the journalists that he could not realistically expect them to respond honestly and professionally to his revelations, and that he was simply appealing to them as fellow humans: “How can you not understand that the world is being pulled in an irreversible direction?”

Today, McGovern said, there is an offer on the table: The Russians are willing to keep the quantitative limits of the New START treaty, if the U.S. will do the same. This offer was made on Sept. 22, but there has been no official answer from the United States. (See the article in this issue by Carl Osgood.)

John Steinbach of the Hiroshima Nagasaki Peace Committee of the National Capital Area, recalled the “Anti-Imperialist League” at the end of the 19th century, which welcomed people from diverse ideological backgrounds. He reminded the participants that Oct. 28 is Vasili Arkhipov Day, named for the Soviet naval officer who prevented a potential nuclear war during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis by countermanding an order to launch a nuclear torpedo. Steinbach gives Trump credit for “at least a semblance of negotiation” between the U.S. and Russia, which did not exist under Biden. He closed with a quote from Baruch Spinoza: “Peace is not the absence of war, it is a virtue, a state of mind, a disposition for benevolence, confidence, justice.”

Zepp-LaRouche asked McGovern to comment on the present European frenzy to prepare for war in Europe. In response, McGovern said that it seems that we no longer have the intelligence professionals we had in the 80s—people with courage, like the CIA officer who warned his superiors that the Soviets believed that the Able Archer exercise was a cover for a nuclear attack.

Jack Gilroy, a leading member of Veterans for Peace and Pax Christi, warned that the insanity of militarism has crept back, motivated by the military-industrial complex. He cited the head of Raytheon (RTX Corp. today), who, prior to the war in Ukraine, said that the tensions in Eastern Europe represented a “profit opportunity” for his business. Gilroy proposed that public schools should teach that “the idea that the military keeps us safe and secure” is as big a lie, as the ones the Nazis told, and that students should take an oath not to interview for a job with any firm that is part of the military-industrial complex.

McGovern and Gilroy, both Catholics, discussed their hopes and disappointments for the American church. Zepp-LaRouche intervened to reemphasize the significance of Pope Leo’s endorsement of Nicholas of Cusa, who was so controversial during his own lifetime that she described him as “the Lyndon LaRouche of his day.”

Cusa was put in the Index of banned books in the Catholic Church. Lyndon LaRouche was wrongfully charged with a crime and put in jail. This was pointed out by LaRouche associate Dennis Small, who was likewise jailed. Small called for the exoneration of LaRouche.

Now, today, the Pope’s action has created a possible window into the Church and to all religions around the world, to put aside their prejudices and take actions to create peace for all of humanity, Zepp-LaRouche said.

Dr. Feroze Sidhwa, an American humanitarian surgeon who has worked extensively in Palestine, presented firsthand experience from Gaza, where he has volunteered at European Hospital in Khan Younis, with the World Health Organization, and later with the American NGO MedGlobal. He said, “Not a whole lot has changed in Gaza since the ceasefire … the situation remains very, very dire.” Israel is permitting reconstruction only in the enclaves controlled by the four gangs it sponsors, and is using this for propaganda, which Sidhwa described as “one of the more cynical things I’ve seen in my life.” He noted the failure of various medical associations in the United States to make any comment on the genocide in Gaza, or even to the widespread killing of medical professionals by Israel.

Conclusions

In their brief concluding remarks, Gilroy expressed the hope that Pope Leo would join Pope Francis in condemning the concept of a “just war.” Father Bury emphasized that Jesus told us to love our enemies, and that it should guide us in our political activity.

Steinbach said that Israel uses its nuclear arsenal as blackmail, as it did by threatening to use nuclear weapons in 1973, when Nixon tried to withhold military aid. McGovern added to Steinbach’s story: Israel refused an offer in 1973 of a mutual defense treaty with the U.S., because mutual defense treaties require internationally recognized borders.

Zepp-LaRouche reflected on the role of religions, which had come up repeatedly in this week’s discussion. She said the problem with all religions is fundamentalism, asserting that their belief is that they know the truth and that it is superior to all others. But every religion also has a current for whom science and faith are not a contradiction. It is this latter faction which Nicholas of Cusa exemplifies, as the figure in the 15th century who made the most important discoveries about man and the universe. Pope Leo’s decision to highlight his role is a breakthrough which should not be underestimated. [eir]


Live with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: Revival of Cusa Opens a New Vision for Peace

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions, comments, and reports to questions@schillerinstitute.org or post them in the next live stream.

Our present phase of history is a time of terrible tension between those promoting war, and those promoting resolution of disputes. Deliberate backing of armed conflict in an age of nuclear weapons is insane. But there are growing forces of reason and hope.

Pope Leo XIV’s raising, on Oct. 25, the breakthrough concepts of Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) is an important advance for forces seeking peace. Cusa’s concept of seeking and proceeding on the higher level of overcoming differences has repeatedly been studied, reported, and advocated by Lyndon and Helga LaRouche over decades. But most particularly, Mrs. Zepp-LaRouche formed an activist association in 2020 that she named the Committee for the Coincidence of Opposites, based on Cusa’s idea of the coincidentia oppositorum (coincidence of opposites), which organization came to be the precursor to the International Peace Coalition, founded in June 2022, at the initiation of Zepp-LaRouche, and now functioning as a critical platform for world dialogue.

At the Vatican on Oct. 27, Prime Minister of Hungary Viktor Orban met with Pope Leo. Orban has volunteered for Budapest to be the venue for a meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Orban posted on X today, “I asked His Holiness to support Hungary’s anti-war efforts. Private audience with His Holiness Pope Leo XIV.”

Other figures and associations, likewise acting on the side of humanity, include leaders of the Global Majority, the BRICS, the expanding Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and collaborating initiatives. In the Indo- and Asian-Pacific this week, there are signals of this direction. Speaking of amity, on Oct. 26 India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, addressing the ASEAN-India Summit in Malaysia by video, pointed out that India and the ASEAN 11 nation members, now constitute 25% of the world’s population, and intend to continue to function as friends.

On the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea this week, President Trump reports he will meet with China’s President Xi Jinping. On Oct. 28, President Trump, now in Tokyo, Japan, is scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, who has expressed concern to pursue a foreign policy of stability and peace in the region. This goes against the prevailing Western insistence that China is the enemy.

The most direct threats of warfare continue to come from the Europe-centered “Coalition of the Willing,” directly charging that Russia is the enemy, bent on invading Europe. Add to this the U.S. belligerence in the Western Hemisphere, building up military forces in the Caribbean.

In the last 10 days, military spokesmen in France have called for contingency readiness that could see French forces placed directly in Ukraine. Chief of Staff of the French Army Gen. Pierre Schill told members of the Defense Committee of the National Assembly on Oct. 24: “We will be ready to deploy forces under security guarantees, if necessary—for the benefit of Ukraine.” He stated that 2026 will be the “year of coalitions,” pointing out that upcoming multinational military exercises, “Orion 26,” will test land, air, and naval contingents, wherever they have to go.

In the Caribbean, U.S. military activity and force deployment have escalated, along with homeland propaganda that fighting the dope trade means taking down Venezuela. The guided missile destroyer USS Gravely has now docked in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, within seven miles of Venezuela. The story is that the ship is carrying out training exercises until Oct. 30. The aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford has been ordered to the Caribbean, from its present location in the Mediterranean. There have been nine U.S. airstrikes on boats in international waters in the Caribbean, plus two in the Pacific off the western coast of Central America. At least 43 persons were killed.

The International Peace Coalition will convene its 126th consecutive weekly meeting on Friday, Oct. 31, at 11 am (ET).

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions, comments, and reports to questions@schillerinstitute.org or post them in the next live stream.


A Closing Window of Opportunity- Report on International Peace Coalition, Week 125

Oct. 25, 2025 (EIRNS)—The 125th consecutive weekly meeting of the International Peace Coalition (IPC) on Friday, Oct. 24, was not the usual panel discussion, but instead a dialogue between Schiller Institute founder and IPC initiator Helga Zepp-LaRouche and Theodore Postol (U.S.), professor emeritus of Science, Technology and National Security at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Zepp-LaRouche began by describing the present strategic turmoil, where we are buffeted between hope and chaos. The Wall Street Journal said that the U.S. had given permission to Ukraine to use Tomahawk missiles to strike deep into Russia. U.S. President Donald Trump then denied the story, and Russian President Vladimir Putin warned that a Russian response would be serious, even overwhelming. There was also some confusion about the planned Trump-Putin summit in Budapest, which was on, then off again. Regarding Gaza, Zepp-LaRouche remarked, “The so-called peace deal does not seem to hold.” The Israeli Knesset voted to annex the West Bank, a repudiation of Palestinian statehood and an indication of Israeli obstruction to peace. The window of opportunity to stop World War III may be closing soon, she warned.

On the hopeful side, she reported on the Bering Strait Tunnel Project round-table discussion, which took place on Oct. 22, with experts on engineering, rail development, finance, and diplomacy from the U.S., Russia, Italy, and Germany.

Putin’s Leadership vs. German Lunacy

Zepp-LaRouche described Putin as “one whom one can only admire for his seemingly endless patience.” She charged that the “regime-change” people who want to get rid of “that thoughtful Putin” have not considered who would replace him, who would control Russia’s nuclear arsenal. Her sentiments were echoed by Postol, who said: “Whenever Putin shows restraint that saves humanity from catastrophe, they think it shows weakness on his part … he shows extraordinary ability to finesse these situations…. We can only be grateful that we did not have a Joe Biden equivalent in the Russian leadership.”

On the other hand, Zepp-LaRouche described how German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has shifted to an “idiotic” policy of “strategic uncertainty” regarding the deployment of Taurus missiles to Ukraine. To keep one’s opponent guessing is “really playing with fire,” she said. Postol added that he finds it hard to believe that anyone could have such a lack of grasp of history as to behave as Merz is behaving: “Germany is now being subjected to strategic deception by its political leadership and the American leadership.” Merz is lying when he says that the missiles deployed to Germany will not be nuclear armed. “The Russians will have no choice but to treat these weapons as nuclear armed,” Postol said. If they are conventional, they are meaningless. He compared this to the installations in Poland and Romania of defensive missiles that can quickly be converted to offense; the Russians do not have the luxury of speculating as to what the current status of those missiles may be. Merz’s approach will tremendously increase the likelihood that nuclear war will begin on German soil.

Teetering on the Brink of Nuclear War

Postol reported that there had been catastrophic events in the past few days, and that Trump’s statements and actions have seriously damaged the prospects for diplomatic progress. Putin has wisely offered to adhere to START provisions for a year while negotiations take place on renewing the treaty. However, due to Trump’s actions, “I think that Russia has now been put in a situation … where it really has no choice but to solve its security concerns on the battlefield in Ukraine.”

Postol, a leading expert on the consequences of the use of nuclear weapons, revisited some of the alarming material he has presented in past IPC meetings. “A nuclear war will effectively end modern civilization,” he said. “This is simply a fact of physics…. Fighting and winning a nuclear war is simply not technically feasible.” Statements by Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer betray a deep ignorance of these facts.

Because of the extreme destructive effects of nuclear weapons, any nation that is attacked with them will be forced to respond with nuclear weapons in a desperate effort to save itself. Able Archer was a 1983 NATO military exercise, simulating a war with the Warsaw Pact, conducted with high-level participants, including then-U.S. Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. By day five of the exercise, it had escalated to the hypothetical use of strategic nuclear weapons—and the U.S. and Soviet Union no longer existed.

Regarding the physical effects of the use of nuclear weapons, Postol said that most people imagine the main devastation to be the result of the shockwave, but that is just a secondary effect. Extraordinary damage is done by the initial fireball, which is much worse than the shockwave. The fireball would set fires over a vast area—approximately 600-700 square kilometers would be instantly ignited. Hurricane-force winds would be sucked into this area by upward convection, causing a gigantic firestorm, a fire tornado. Shelters would turn into ovens. Three-hundred-kph winds would accompany the shockwave that follows. Postol illustrated this very dramatically and passionately with historic images.

Europe’s War Dance

Zepp-LaRouche noted that Putin had changed Russia’s strategic doctrine one year ago, from a basic “no first use” doctrine to one under which Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons, when even a conventionally armed country backed by a nuclear power threatens the national existence of Russia. The previous doctrine was not sufficient to deter existential threats.

Postol commented on the rearmament drive from leading NATO nations: “As for all this talk about going to war with Russia, it’s almost laughable.” Russia clearly has no intention to invade Europe or occupy Ukraine. They have been forced to take action because of the behavior of the West. In January of 2022, then-U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken told Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov that the U.S. reserved the right to put nuclear weapons in Ukraine. Why is anyone surprised that Russia then invaded Ukraine?

Zepp-LaRouche asked Postol for his take on the strident calls for a conventional arms buildup. Postol said that the collapse of the German economy is a direct result of the Ukraine war. When Biden blew up the Nord Stream pipeline, he did much more damage to Germany than to Russia. “Germany is in the process of deindustrializing,” but Merz is not concerned with that. He wants to divert limited funds away from the people of Germany to prepare for an unnecessary war with Russia. European leaders are so desperate to cover up their own responsibility for the economic collapse that they are willing to initiate a war with Russia.

Good and Evil

When the session was opened to questions, one person asked about the question of evil in strategic politics. Zepp-LaRouche stressed the tenth of her Ten Principles of a New International Security and Development Architecture, that man is basically good. She said that the origin of evil is the system of oligarchy. Friedrich Schiller said the most important requirement for humanity is Empfindungsvermögen (empathy). What good does it do you to have written on your tombstone that you owned 200 Porsches and ate kilotons of caviar? Hannah Arendt was not entirely wrong about the “banality of evil.”

Postol agreed that man is good, with some qualification. He said that man is also “cursed with animal instincts.” We need a world where reason can overwhelm our animal instincts. Unfortunately, he said, there are very few people in positions of power today who wish to do good. European leaders of today created the conditions which led to the Ukraine war. They lack the courage of a Nikita Khrushchev to admit it when they have made mistakes.

Conclusion

Zepp-LaRouche expressed her appreciation of Postol as a “voice of reason,” saying that if you don’t start with what Postol laid out about the reality of nuclear war, you will end up wrong. She encouraged all participants to redouble their efforts to halt the march toward nuclear war, before the window of opportunity closes forever. [eir]


Zepp-LaRouche Tells TASS, Bering Strait Tunnel Is ‘Ideal Embodiment of Peace Through Development’

The following is a machine translation of an interview Helga Zepp-LaRouche gave to TASS news service on the now widely discussed proposal for a Bering Strait Tunnel connecting Russia and the United States. The late American statesman and economist Lyndon LaRouche had long advocated the building of the Bering Strait Tunnel great project:

Expert Zepp-LaRouche Assesses the Prospects of a Tunnel between Russia and the United States

It would embody the concept of “peace through development,” says Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute.

WASHINGTON, October 18. /TASS Correspondent Sergei Yumatov. A tunnel built under the Bering Strait and connecting Russia and the United States would be the ideal embodiment of the concept of “peace through development.” Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute, outlined this position in an interview with a TASS correspondent.

“It is obvious to President Trump that normalizing U.S.-Russia relations will open up enormous prospects for developing economic cooperation between the two countries. The most impressive [project] would be the ‘Putin-Trump tunnel,’ which, as Kirill Dmitriev, CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund, noted on social media, would become a 70-mile link between America and Afro-Eurasia across the Bering Strait,” the expert noted.

According to her, “the tunnel would help open up the entire Russian Far East for development and create enormous investment opportunities for resource-poor countries.” “The Putin-Trump Tunnel would be the ideal embodiment of the ‘peace through development’ concept,” Zepp-LaRouche emphasized. The choice of Budapest as the venue for a new meeting between Russian and American leaders, according to the expert, “will remind Europeans of the nearly lost art of diplomacy.” “This is good for the entire world,” she concluded.

President Donald Trump called the Bering Strait tunnel project, which would connect Russia and the United States by rail, “interesting.” Kirill Dmitriev, the Russian President’s Special Representative for Economic Cooperation with Foreign Countries and CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), stated that such a tunnel could be built in less than eight years, and its cost would not exceed $8 billion.

The idea of connecting the transport systems of Eurasia and America via a tunnel has been discussed for decades. As The Times newspaper noted in 2011, citing British experts, freight transportation along the Eurasia-U.S. highway would also connect resource-rich but sparsely populated areas of the planet with key overpasses, and would be less expensive, faster, and safer than by sea.

Read also:

1. Dmitriev: Discussions on Tunnel Connecting U.S. and Russia Have Begun.

2. Zepp-LaRouche Expert: Russia and the U.S. Could Build a Tunnel under the Bering Strait.

3. The State Duma Called Trump’s Question to Zelenskyy about a Tunnel between Russia and the U.S. Trolling.


Page 1 of 23123...Last