Top Left Link Buttons

Helga Zepp-LaRouche

Category Archives

Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: Win-Win and the American System

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, Sept. 30th, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

A quick look at the realities confronting the so-called architects of today’s “rules-based” order shows that their system is past the point of no return. The U.S.’ illegal war against Iran is failing to achieve anything other than the destruction of the global economy, and risks spreading throughout the region and beyond. U.S. President Donald Trump, one who is quick to brag about “defeating the deep state” and making everything “great,” has failed at both, and now presides over possibly the worst looming economic disaster in decades.

Take the absolutely disastrous economic shocks that are now sweeping the globe as a result of the illegal war against Iran: Global fertilizer trade is down 20-25% from the start of the war, causing farmers to shift to alternative means of cultivation and decrease the amount of land under cultivation; grain production is estimated to drop 2.5% compared to a year ago as a result of the Iran war, exacerbating an already fragile food situation where more than 2 billion do not have an adequate diet; fuel inventories have been steadily drawn down over the past six months, and are now decreasing by more than 6 million barrels of oil per day globally; and diesel prices have skyrocketed, reaching an all-time record of $6.52/gallon on Sep. 22 in the U.S., forcing a crisis for the productive sectors of every nation in the world.

The Trump administration is now mulling a diesel export ban or related measures to try to lower fuel prices before the midterm elections. The news has already sent shockwaves around the world, particularly in European countries such as Germany, whose fuel reserves are extra low and rely heavily on U.S. imports.

At the same time, U.S. Treasury rates are soaring to their highest levels in decades, with 10-year notes surpassing 5.2% yields on Sep. 28. An article in the London Financial Times on Sept. 22 even admitted what few have dared to: The Federal Reserve has been carrying out full-on quantitative easing—printing money and building up its balance sheet by buying Treasury securities from big Wall Street banks. It began this policy in November 2025, having ended “tightening” nearly a year ago. Thus, despite the much-ballyhooed efforts to rein in inflation, the Fed has been bailing out large banks at a pace of $40 billion/month while assisting them in reducing their Treasury holdings. In case it wasn’t obvious, the underlying fundamentals are not looking good.

While the numbers clearly indicate the economic dead-end of this policy, they also indicate the ongoing dissolution of the underlying Beast-man outlook, currently rampant throughout the Western establishment. From the illegal regime-change wars, to the policies of global economic exploitation, to the toleration of the genocide in Palestine, and the commitment to spend trillions more on military budgets—these policies are being overwhelmingly rejected, even if they still hold sway over a portion of the world.

One only has to look at the recent visit of Pope Leo XIV to France, where he told the audience, “I urge you… never to grow resigned to the prospect of war or to consider it ‘inevitable,’ but instead to persevere in the promotion of dialogue and diplomacy.” He was met by a crowd of 300,000 in Paris and separately by 80,000 youth, in an overwhelming response to the kind of moral leadership lacking in the West today. A similar phenomenon was seen at the New Delhi BRICS Summit, where, for example, the President of Iran was welcomed by a community representing over 50% of the world’s population. This is also evident in the fact that Russia’s Sergey Lavrov participated in a full 50 meetings during his three-day stay in New York for the United Nations General Assembly. Or, in another expression, consider the outpouring of excitement seen at the Schiller Institute NYC Chorus’ recent performance of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony on the 25th anniversary of September 11. Even though infrequently experienced in the world today, Beethoven’s and Schiller’s call that “All men shall become brothers” is ringing in the hearts of a growing portion of humanity.

In discussion with associates on Sep. 28, Helga Zepp-LaRouche characterized the situation as follows:

“If one looks at the process going on at the strategic level, I think it is important to not get stuck in this event or that event, but to actually recognize the fact that we are in the most gigantic transformation of the world order since at least the end of the Second World War—and it is not yet clear what the new order will be. What is clear, however, is that the old order, based on Western dominance and imperial ideas about the superiority of the West—that order is gone indefinitely and for sure.”

This is how to locate the state visit between Presidents Xi Jinping and Donald Trump, which the Chinese called a “milestone.” President Xi is optimistic that the so-called Thucydides Trap can be overcome, Zepp-LaRouche continued, because he knows that the majority of the world has “a completely different sense of what security means, namely development,” and is “clearly, consciously” setting about to create entirely new institutions and “a new kind of international cooperation.” Therefore, “if the world is supposed to get out of the dilemma where a Damocles sword of nuclear extinction hangs over us, the only way that will be accomplished is if we can convince the significant forces in Europe and the United States in particular to join with that Global Majority.”


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: UNGA Session Offers Opportunity to Consolidate a New Paradigm.

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, Sept. 23rd, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

To the Heads of State and Delegations participating in the UN General Assembly in September 2026

Download

The following statement was released today by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder and leader of the Schiller Institute.

This institution,  the United Nations General Assembly, may not be perfect and may need reform, but it does represent still, at this moment of extreme crisis, the most important institution where representatives of the entire human population come together to address existential problems.

This time, the UN General Assembly takes place at a moment of great danger to the very existence of the human species. Two regional wars, the Ukraine war and the war against Iran, are both threatening to escalate into  wider regional conflicts, and even global nuclear war. Several senior  military experts are warning that we are in a situation more dangerous than during the Cuban missile crisis.

Most recently in the United States and Great Britain, the discussion has broken out into the open about the potential use of tactical nuclear weapons, and even the idea that a “limited nuclear war” can be fought and won. Anybody who has studied the matter knows that there is no such thing as a tactical nuclear war, because even the use of a single so-called tactical nuclear weapon will escalate, within days, to a full global nuclear war, leading to the annihilation of the human species.

In the course of the last thirty-five years, after the end of the Cold War,  the world has undergone the transition from  the failed effort to to establish an unipolar world to an unfolding multipolarity, which, however, is still governed by the logic of geopolitics. Geopolitics is based on the idea that one nation, or a group of nations, has a legitimate interest that it can impose on another nation or group of nations. 

We are experiencing at the same time the end of the epoch of five hundred years of colonialism. If we, as the human species, want to prevent this tumultuous transition period from ending up in a new world war, we have to replace geopolitical confrontation with a completely new paradigm, the vision of ONE humanity. It is the same question which was discussed during the time of the young American Republic, in the Federalist Papers:  Can mankind govern itself?

If this question is to be answered affirmatively in the time of  thermonuclear weapons, we must establish an entirely new paradigm: The  idea of the one humanity first, must be put above all particular interests.

This U.N. General Assembly is the place to put the concept of a “New Security and Development Architecture” on the agenda, which must take into account the interests of every single country on the planet.  The four Global Initiatives – but especially the Global Governance Initiative – put forward by China, represent a very practical approach to establishing  the basis for such a new paradigm.

Let the “Spirit of Bandung”, and the “Spirit of Shanghai”, and the spirit of Beethoven’s Ninth symphony, that All People Shall Be Brethren, be your inspiration!

Respectfully,

Helga Zepp-LaRouche,

Founder of the Schiller Institute


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: German Election Result Sends Tremors Worldwide

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, Sept. 9th, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

“Truly exciting! A political Earthquake” were among the descriptions today by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder and leader of the Schiller Institute, speaking of the “smashing defeat” for German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Sept. 6 state elections in Saxony-Anhalt, in which the Alternative for Germany (AfD) Party polled 43.8%, far ahead of any other party. The CDU vote, party of Merz, fell by half since the last election, down to 17.2%. The SPD (Social Democrats) fell to 9.3%. The Linke (Left) went down to 8.6%. The BSW (Alliance Sarah Wagenknecht—Reason and Justice) 5.3% (enough to place in the parliament).

Thus, not just Merz’s Germany, but Europe’s “Big Three” stand repudiated along with Merz, referring to France, led by minority President Emmanuel Macron, and the UK, led by Andy Burnham, the latest of many prime ministers. These leaders have been colluding as the Coalition of the Willing to keep funding and supplying Ukraine as a proxy against Russia, while subverting their own national economies, and all of Europe, with a wild arms build up drive and other destructive policies.

The AfD and the BSW are clear on their policy stance to stop the warfare over Ukraine, and start diplomatic and economic relations with Russia and other countries. They call for resuming the Nord Stream gas pipelines, and other economic basics. On all else, their programs vary greatly in principle and wisdom. You can call it a “mixed bag.” But with over 77% of the eligible voters participating yesterday, the mandate of the Sept. 6 German state election is clear. Their vote is in the direction of a new system of foreign and economic relations, provided there is policy intervention to help lift up the outlook of people, to a higher level of knowledge and reason, to bring about a new system. This is the call to action of people everywhere, to take up this mission.

Either we stop warfare, and we have a new economic and security system in the world, with development as the basis for peace, or we are headed down the short road to World War III, and that means nuclear annihilation. The Saxony-Anhalt vote against Merz is a reflection of, and opportunity for, a shift. …

Read the full Daily Brief and subscribe to EIR News to get the latest updates and analyses of the strategic situation.


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: The Debate Over Nuclear War Is Real

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, Sept. 2nd, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

On Day One of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization’s 26th annual heads of state summit in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan today, leaders representing 3.4 billion people, from the 10 member nations, along with leaders of 17 partner nations and guests, conferred in bilateral meetings on how to proceed for the betterment of the world, stopping war and want. Tomorrow will be plenary presentations and an expected Bishkek Declaration. The official theme of the event is: “25 years of the SCO: Together Toward Sustainable Peace, Development, and Prosperity.”

Meetings in Bishkek included Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Putin and Indian Prime Minister Modi. Turkish President Recep Erdogan and Putin. Xi Jinping and Kyrgyzstan President Sadr Japarov, who is hosting Xi on a state visit, discussing, among other things, infrastructure projects affecting connectivity in all Eurasia. Iran President Masoud Pezeshkian met with Putin, with Modi, and other leaders including Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. There were many leaders and meetings.

The preliminary reports coming out of the SCO confab show that the focus of the extraordinary number of consultations taking place reiterates the need for peace and diplomacy in the world, in direct rejection of the current hallmark positions of the collective West, which is that might-makes-right in both military and economic terms.

The United States, alongside Israel, after six months of making war on Iran, with no “victory,” resumed bombing over the weekend, hitting Iran’s Larak Island in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran then responded by targeted strikes on U.S. sites in Jordan and the UAE. The European war-making alignment continues its backing of Ukraine, extreme rearmament, and demonizing Russia, while the economy of Europe itself is in breakdown. EU defense ministers will meet in Ireland tomorrow, locked in this destructive mode.

But the most dramatic event of the day, is how the new economic warfare campaign launched by the United States against the world, in the name of harming Iran— “Operation Economic Outcast”—is already a non-starter after barely a week in progress. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced the U.S. policy Aug. 24, and reiterated it yesterday and today at the Group of 20 finance officials, who are meeting in North Carolina, preparatory to the G20 heads of state summit set for Florida this December. Bessent told AP Aug. 30, that nations must break off relations with Iran, and if they don’t, “This is going to be financial violence if we have to. We are showing people that we know who you are, you know who you are, and this has got to stop.”

The world responds. Today, Prime Minister Modi and Pres. Pezeshkian discussed how to increase the trade and economic relations between their two nations. This follows China having already stated it will not honor the Bessent decree.

Bessent is in a flight forward at the Ashville, NC gathering. Today he thanked the EU officials present for supporting the U.S. “Operation Economic Outcast,” while media say his other support is confined to the UK, Japan, and Bahrain. What the U.S. “Outcast” initiative has done is spotlight the pending blow-out of the entire dollar system. Bessent and Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh tried to fend off questions, by saying “growth” will allow handling of debt, and minimizing the U.S. $40 trillion government debt. When a reporter asked about why the U.S. is buying-back its own Treasury notes, Bessent deflected by saying, EU Central Bank head Mario Draghi did it in Europe. Japan did it bigger than anyone.

The immediate danger amid all this glaring Western decline, and Global Majority advance, is the recourse by some still in positions of power to resort to use of the “nuclear option” in warfare. It’s for the sane to sound the alarm in all possible ways.

Join those circulating the letter for an urgent world meeting, “Appeal to Pope Leo XIV To Organize a Global Leaders Summit To Address the Questions of Peace and Nuclear Disarmament.”

Join the dialogue on the alternative to war and breakdown. The EIR will co-host this Friday Sept. 4 an online Roundtable, “An Alternative to War and Looting in the Americas.” This event features speakers for a dialogue on the kinds of projects and approach also now raised at the Bishkek SCO summit, and Sept. 1-4 in Vladivostok at Russia’s Eastern Economic Forum. Sept. 12-13 in New Delhi, India will host the annual BRICS heads of state summit.


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: Are Bessent’s Sanctions D-Day for the U.S. Economy?

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, Aug, 26, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

On Thursday, Oct. 25, 1962, three days after President Kennedy announced the discovery of Soviet missiles in Cuba, Pope John XXIII went on Vatican Radio and asked the governments of the world to keep talking. The next morning Pravda carried the appeal, under the headline “Save Peace!” (or “Save the World!”) quoting him at length: let leaders “heed the anguished cry which, from every point of the earth, from innocent children to the aged, from individuals to communities, rises toward Heaven: peace! Peace!” The day after the Pravda report, Khrushchev proposed to Kennedy the exchange that ended the crisis.

Consider the present situation.

Gold has overtaken U.S. Treasuries as the single largest central bank reserve asset by market value. The 30-year Treasury yield touched a nineteen-year high. The Treasury doubled the size of its own bond buybacks, and the effect lasted only briefly. On Monday the Secretary of the Treasury announced an operation whose stated terms are that any entity facilitating Iranian money laundering “will be removed from the U.S. dollar system” and named gold as one of five sectors to be sanctioned. Three American officials told a reporter that 40 tankers crossed the Strait of Hormuz on Friday night, carrying 16 million barrels. That claim is difficult to reconcile with commercial vessel-tracking data, which showed far fewer recorded vessel transits.

What that costs is counted in people. The American labor force lost about 1.3 million of them in twelve months. That decline is especially striking in an aging country whose labor-force growth increasingly depends on immigration, especially as another million are to be struck from it by early 2027.

What is a human being for? “It is not the exertion of physical force by men which rules mankind,” Lyndon LaRouche wrote in 1994, in The Science of Physical Economy as the Platonic Epistemological Basis for All Branches of Human Knowledge, published in EIR. “Mankind is ruled by the force of ideas, by the interplay of those contending ideas which, acting through the minds of men, thus control the physical conduct of society.” And in the same essay, against every doctrine that sorts human beings into the useful and the disposable: “The human race is made up of nothing but individuals who share in common that spark of creative reason which defines all persons as in the image of the Creator.”

A million people removed from a labor force are not a statistic. They are a million minds a nation’s leadership has decided it does not require.

Archbishop Paul Gallagher, the Vatican’s Secretary for Relations with States, is in Moscow. He meets Sergey Lavrov Tuesday, Aug. 25, and Yuri Ushakov, President Putin’s foreign policy aide, the next day. An open letter released Aug. 19 asks Pope Leo XIV to convene the heads of state of the three principal nuclear powers, in the spirit of John XXIII’s appeal in 1962. Leo has already made the argument himself: on July 30, 2025, marking fifty years since the Helsinki Final Act, he called it essential “to persevere in dialogue, strengthen cooperation, and make diplomacy the preferred path.”

Will we “save peace” today?


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: U.S. War Hawks Push Option to Use Tactical Nukes

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, Aug, 19, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has caused a firestorm by posting on X that she is not speculating when she says that President Trump is contemplating nuclear strikes on Iran.

In a post which has now over five million views, MTG said, “They are discussing using nuclear weapons on Iran in strategy meetings. Yes you read that correctly. It’s real. I’m not speculating, I know. And it’s pure evil.”

White House spokesman Davis Ingle was quick to respond, telling USA Today: “Marjorie ‘Quitter’ Greene has no idea what she is talking about…She is completely out of the loop and should quit spreading Fake News.”

Honesty has not been a strong trait of the Trump administration’s foreign policy, but rather than speculate, given the massive destructive potential of nuclear weapons, every person should mobilize to ensure that a nuclear weapon is not used. Not in Iran and not anywhere else.

Retired German General Harald Kujat, who had been Chairman of the NATO Military Committee two decades ago, had said that the great fear of the Soviet Union, now the Russian Federation, was a Cuban Missile Crisis in reverse. Worse than that, the Russian leadership must know that even before the end of WWII, Britain’s alcoholic Prime Minister Winston Churchill was already contemplating a nuclear first strike against the then Soviet Union.

If one looks at the arc of history from the dropping of the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which had more to do with threatening Russia than defeating Japan (which had already been defeated), the world has been moving in the direction of nuclear war with a few brief exceptional periods.

The great American statesman and former presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche warned in 2011, when Muammar Gaddafi was brutally murdered in the streets, that this was preparatory to a war with Russia.

That march toward nuclear war with Russia has been pushed by the Anglo-Zionist Epstein-class billionaires behind successive American presidencies from Barack Obama to Donald Trump’s second term.

The stakes are even higher today because their multi-quadrillion-dollar bubble of speculative obligations is nearing the end of its sustainability. People who think nothing of raping and shooting children at short range will not shy away from using a nuclear weapon. As far as they are concerned, they have two highly compatible objectives:

1. Reduce the world’s population

2. Maintain their monetarist financial dictatorship

The problem they have is that human beings are not animals. As the great poet of freedom, Friedrich Schiller said in his play “Wilhelm Tell,” “There is a limit to a tyrant’s power.” Billions of people in the nations of the BRICS-plus, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the Organization of African Unity, to name a few, reject the old colonial order. They do not believe that might makes right.

China has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, and India celebrated 79 years of independence from the British Empire on August 15th.

The way to avoid a thermonuclear Armageddon is for the nations of the West, in particular the United States, to recognize that they have a shared future with the entirety of mankind.

There will soon be a second letter to Pope Leo, signed by prominent peace activists, political leaders, military analysts and others, asking him to convene an emergency international peace conference. It is indeed fortuitous that the leader of the Catholic Church comes from the United States, and that he is a profound thinker familiar with the writings of Nicholas of Cusa.

Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche has convened an International Peace Coalition that has become an important meeting place for the adults in the room, as South Africa’s former Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor has said. On September 4th, the IPC will also host an EIR Roundtable: An Alternative to War and Looting in the Americas.

LaRouche congressional candidate Jose Vega is leading a national fight against the Epstein elite by targeting one of their lead ducks, Richie Torres in the Bronx. Long-time LaRouche associate independent presidential candidate Diane Sare has become a spokesperson for an appropriate presidential policy, as reflected in her interview prominently featured in TASS.

On September 11th, the Schiller Institute NYC Chorus will bring the poetry of Schiller to life with a performance of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony and the Brahms Naenie on the 25th anniversary of the September 11th attacks.

We have the evil-doers surrounded! Join us and support our work.


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: Tectonic Shifts and the Science of a New Paradigm

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, Aug, 12, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

Helga Zepp-LaRouche’s closing remarks to IPC #166:

Well, I think the crucial question was posed by you, Jack, earlier in your remarks, when you said we have to look for moral leaders. Because answering the question of the nun from Spain, I think the letter you have composed, Jack, with the letter to the Pope going through Archbishop Wester, but then basically making that a rallying point for everybody. I think that that points to the right way to go for the highest possible solution, which would be moral leadership from the Pope and to get together the three leaders of the most powerful nations in the world. That is China, the United States, and Russia. And that way, you have something to rally everybody around.

Because the problem is, and I agree with what Scott Ritter had to say about that you cannot be happy that the Anglo-American empire is clearly in a decline, because I have said many times, and I believe that deeply, that while the Soviet Union disintegrated peacefully in 1991, I do not think that the Anglo-American empire will dismantle itself as peacefully. I think that when they have the feeling that they are at the point of demise, exactly what Scott was pointing to, the danger of the use of nuclear weapons becomes the most acute.

So therefore, the question is, what can we do under the circumstances? The main problem we have is that the masses of people in the collective West, which is not so collective anymore, are either complacent, indifferent, just not informed, or too fearful to act. So, we have to do something which catalyzes emotion in those people. And I think the idea that if everybody contributes, no matter where they come from, let them come from a Catholic background, and there we have a lot to do, because the Catholic churches are not everywhere against the war. …

But in any case, it has to come from the religions, not only the Christian religions, but we should branch out to essentially all religions of goodwill, all people of goodwill. And then at the same time, basically say an ecumenical approach, which stretches the word ecumenical beyond religion, to include people who are concerned with the well-being of humanity. And that happens to include China, for example, because if you look at the record of China in the last 40, 50 years, having transformed 850 million people of their own country from total poverty to now basically being the most wealthy, prosperous country in the world. … Then you have many others. We should think about what method to use. It cannot be violence. It cannot, in any case, add to the already escalated level of violence in the world on all levels, from school shootings to the level of aggressive wars.

So, we need to go back to the theories of Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, except that we do not need armed resistance for the reason of nonviolence, which I just mentioned.

But it needs to also appeal to that, and that is what this beautiful nun from Spain said, this internal better quality of man where man is the living image of God, imago viva Dei. Because if we do not evoke that absolute precious element within each human being, which does separate us from all other creatures. People can love their pets, and there’s something very beautiful in pets, but it is only the human being being in the image of God, the Creator, which makes us creative. And that is what is so precious and what is in danger of being trampled upon and eradicated with all this violence, pornography, perversion, and all of these things which are satanic in our present environment.

So, it comes to the question of elevating people, ennobling people, appealing to that which makes them participate in the eternal chain of human generations, where each of us has the absolute obligation to contribute something to make the next generations live more rich and better in wisdom, in creativity, in having access to the beauty of this universe, than the previous generations.

We have to appeal to that love for mankind. I believe that without evoking love for mankind, we will not succeed. So, I can only ask all of the participants and listeners of this discussion, take this letter to Archbishop Wester, get it around, get the program, this time we will have the entire program of the IPC as a video, get it around so that people can listen to the arguments, what we are fighting against, the danger of extinction, the memory of Hiroshima, the parallels in the present, the dangerous situation we are in, the demands of this changing world situation which does require that each of us act and not sit on the fence of history.

So, if everybody would start to become an organizer appealing to the Pope, the Pope would be surrounded by an ever more powerful chorus of voices from Africa, from Latin America, from Europe, from Asia, all demanding that he takes this role. And I’m sure that Putin would react exactly like Khrushchev did. And I think that Xi Jinping would also listen. And I think then we could convince President Trump, who set out in his second term, to bring better relations with Russia and China, that he still could do that. And hopefully, we will move the world into a secure domain.

Watch full IPC here


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: On the Escalation Ladder to Nuclear War: Where Are the Responsible Figures?

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, July 29, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

In her new article “On the Escalation Ladder to Nuclear War: Where Are the Responsible Figures?”, soon to be published in the EIR Magazine, Helga Zepp-LaRouche addresses the current danger of nuclear war resulting from an escalation in two volatile flashpoints—Ukraine and the Middle East.

Zepp-LaRouche writes:

The strategic situation threatens to spiral completely out of control in the short term due to two escalating regional wars—in Ukraine and the Middle East—potentially resulting in a global economic depression within weeks or, at most, months, or perhaps even leading in the short term to a nuclear Third World War. This existential concern is shared by a large portion of the population in the so-called “collective West,” yet the political establishment of the West—with few exceptions—makes not the slightest attempt to bring the war in Ukraine to an end through diplomacy and negotiation. While such efforts do exist regarding the war against Iran, they currently lack the necessary programmatic approach, and consequently, the requisite impact.

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche for her weekly Live Dialogue and discuss her analysis and the implications for the current strategic situation.


On the Escalation Ladder to Nuclear War: Where Are the Responsible Figures?

by Helga Zepp-LaRouche

July 26—The strategic situation threatens to spiral completely out of control in the short term due to two escalating regional wars—in Ukraine and the Middle East—potentially resulting in a global economic depression within weeks or, at most, months, or perhaps even leading in the short term to a nuclear Third World War. This existential concern is shared by a large portion of the population in the so-called “collective West,” yet the political establishment of the West—with few exceptions—makes not the slightest attempt to bring the war in Ukraine to an end through diplomacy and negotiation. While such efforts do exist regarding the war against Iran, they currently lack the necessary programmatic approach, and consequently, the requisite impact.

In the so-called Middle East—or more accurately, Southwest Asia—the United States is sinking into a strategic quagmire through its repeated bombing campaigns. These campaigns offer no prospect of a winner but will bring unspeakable suffering to millions of civilians across many countries, further impoverish the world’s poorest, trigger new refugee crises, and—in the worst-case scenario—escalate into a global war. This two-times unprovoked war of aggression against Iran has already fundamentally altered the balance of power in the region: the world’s strongest military power—the United States—and Israel, also an extremely powerful military force, have failed to defeat Iran, a nation of medium strength whose resilience was clearly vastly underestimated. The U.S.’s unilateral withdrawal from the Memorandum of Understanding signed on June 17 was likewise unprovoked, given that Article 5 of the MoU had officially granted Iran control over the Strait of Hormuz. Thus, whether they admit it or not, the U.S. has now lost the war with Iran—adding it to the list that includes Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, alongside various other retreats.

The Gulf Cooperation Council states will have to draw the inevitable conclusion that the presence of U.S. military bases on their soil did not guarantee the promised security, but instead turned them into targets for Iranian retaliatory strikes. Recent mutual attacks on civilian infrastructure—and desalination plants in particular—threaten to potentially depopulate these desert nations. Kuwait relies on desalinated water for approximately 42% of its needs, the UAE for 52%, Bahrain for 68%, and Qatar for 77%. Without these desalination plants, these states are essentially deserts where no one can live.

After 13 nights of merciless American attacks on military and civilian installations in Iran, there is now a pause, likely due less to the allegations of war crimes than to a shortage of the U.S.’s ammunition—something one cannot say without risking imprisonment, according to U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz—and probably also protests from Gulf States fearing for their survival. Furthermore, the renewed fighting between Yemen and Saudi Arabia has demonstrated the consequences for the global economy should the Bab el-Mandeb Strait be blocked; such a scenario would force an additional 12-15% of global trade and roughly 30% of container shipping to take the significantly longer detour around Africa’s Cape of Good Hope.

The Sword of Damocles Looms

Despite the daily fluctuations by U.S. President Donald Trump, regarding the likelihood that this arbitrarily instigated war could still be ended by a “deal,” the Sword of Damocles continues to hang over everyone’s heads. Namely, the risk that the advice of certain warmongers to invade Iran with U.S. ground troops might be heeded—leading to massive shipments of “body bags” of dead soldiers back home, and, as a last resort, the use of tactical nuclear weapons to eliminate the Iranian nuclear facilities.

If this inhumane and desperate act of madness were to occur, it would immediately escalate beyond the region. Even though Iran has no formal military assistance pact with any other country, it is hardly conceivable that Russia and China would stand idly by while nuclear weapons are used against Iran. Annie Jacobsen, American author of the 2024 bestselling book Nuclear War: A Scenario, emphasized in an interview this week that anyone at the Pentagon who has considered this scenario knows that a nuclear war, however it begins, can only end in one way: with total, apocalyptic annihilation.

It is an almost macabre speculation about which war is more dangerous: the one against Iran or the one in Ukraine, which is in reality a complete proxy war by NATO against Russia.

General (ret.) Harald Kujat, former Inspector General of the German Armed Forces and Chairman of the NATO Military Committee, recently warned in the Swiss newspaper Zeitgeschehen im Fokus (Current Events in Focus), quoting the actuality of quotes of former Chancellor Helmut Schmidt, that the situation was worsening day by day, just as it had been in August 1914. He accused Western political leaders of never having attempted to prevent the war through diplomacy, but on the contrary, of having done everything in their power to prolong it and of providing financial, political, and material support.

Kujat ruthlessly criticizes the Western governments, and especially the German government: He criticizes the multiple transgressions of Russia’s absolute red lines, such as Ukraine’s attacks with NATO and/or U.S. support against strategic targets of Russia’s nuclear triad; the German government’s attempts to promote Ukraine’s NATO accession, another absolute red line for Russia; and, more generally, NATO’s de facto participation in Ukraine’s war against Russia, a war that would have ended long ago without massive arms deliveries, financial aid, training, satellite reconnaissance, and real-time target data, etc., and which Russia views as precisely that. Kujat rejects the claim that the coming war with Russia is inevitable, a claim the population is being prepared for daily through propaganda, as he does in many other articles, by pointing to the lack of cui bono and Russia’s insufficient capacity to invade a European country. Conversely, the conventional war for which Europe appears to be preparing, coupled with a delayed and questionable U.S. involvement, threatens to create a situation in which neither side can achieve a swift victory, thus creating the risk of the first use of nuclear weapons by one side or the other to force a resolution. According to Kujat, a nuclear winter would last approximately fifty years.

Even though both wars had ostensibly different triggers, the underlying dynamic in both stems from the same cause: the West as a whole could not resist the temptation, after the end of the Cold War, to succumb to an arrogant triumphalism. And while it was initially the Anglo-American neoconservatives who attempted to establish a unipolar world order, it was later the Europeans who adapted to this attempt, even sabotaging Trump’s initially perhaps earnest peace policy through a “coalition of the willing.” The unspeakable demonization of Russia only flared up again when Russian President Vladimir Putin set about asserting Russia’s role as a world power and sought to halt its containment. And China has done nothing wrong except violate the Wolfowitz Doctrine, which states that no nation or group of nations can ever be allowed to surpass the United States in political, economic, or military strength.

As a result of the boundless overconfidence of leading circles in the West, who accepted Western dominance in the world as their inherent birthright, and a long series of errors and mismanagement, as well as the complete lack of a positive vision for the future, which is now being replaced by aggressive militarism, the world order lies in ruins. We have—hopefully—only a very small window of opportunity left to end these wars through genuine diplomacy and to rebuild the shattered trust.

A New Framework for International Relations

There is only one promising way to save world peace: We must immediately place the establishment of a new global security and development architecture on the international agenda and seriously create a new framework for international relations. This must be based on the UN Charter, the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, and the lessons of the Peace of Westphalia, which emphasize that a peaceful order can only succeed if it takes into account the interests of “the other.”

In other words, the principle of indivisible security must be reinstated. Besides the Schiller Institute’s proposal for such a new architecture, formulated in the Ten Principles, China, with its four global initiatives, and especially its Global Governance Initiative, has so far made the most comprehensive proposal in this regard.

The month of August must be used intensively to prepare the formalization of the discussion on a new architecture, to initiate initial diplomatic preparations, and to take corresponding steps in parliaments and other relevant institutions. This year’s UN General Assembly—if we make it to September—may be humanity’s last chance to escape annihilation.

Kujat writes in the cited article: “To prevent the worst from happening, Europeans are now more than ever required to correct miscalculations and to act with realism, a sense of responsibility, and reason. In the current situation, negotiations to end the war must be seen not only as preventing a major European war, but also as an opportunity to avert Ukraine’s military defeat and to secure its continued existence as a sovereign, independent, and viable state. Now, individuals with strategic judgment and security policy foresight are needed, individuals who are guided by German interests and the constitutional mandate for peace, in order to find ways out of the danger of a major European war.”

These individuals, who exist in every country, must now step forward and demonstrate their responsibility. At stake is the mandate for peace enshrined in the German Basic Law and the question of whether we, as a human species, are morally capable of survival.

Please contact: helga-zepp@proton.me


Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche: We Are Approaching a Nuclear War which Will Destroy Civilization

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, July 22, 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET

In an interview on YouTube, Harald Kujat of Germany warned against the military buildup against Russia in the following words. Gen. Kujat is a retired German Four-Star Air Force General; former Chief of Staff of the German Armed Forces; and was Chairman of the NATO Military Committee from 2002-2005.

“We are dealing with a nuclear power—namely, the largest nuclear power on this Earth. Through the use of nuclear weapons, we are capable of bringing about the end of the world. And if that is not an incentive to prevent an escalation into a war with the largest nuclear power, then I do not know what else it would take. At the very least, it would mean that here in Europe, the use of nuclear weapons would trigger at least a 50-year Nuclear Winter.

“How is this European continent supposed to survive if there is a war here? We have witnessed the destruction of the Second World War. A future war would surpass that by many times over. Where has this historical knowledge actually gone among our politicians? Where is the understanding of the dangers we are exposed to today?”

————

We in the Schiller Institute, which founded and convenes the International Peace Coalition weekly, fully agree with this assertion of General Kujat that the world–not only Europe–is sliding towards a pit of war which looks, with every passing day, more likely to be a nuclear war, from which no nation would recover; and at this point, no one can say how long it will be before we cannot reverse that slide.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute, remarked today that General Kujat’s statement expresses the view of humanity’s future, which she has held for some time. “We have never been at this level of danger before,” she said, not in the Cuban Missile Crisis, not in World War II.

The march to world war must be stopped before the arrogant and ignorant confidence of so many political “leaders” of the West makes it unstoppable.

Therefore we are organizing our political activities and economic collaborations, and the independent campaigns of Diane Sare for President, Jose Vega in the Bronx C.D. 15, and those independent candidates around the country who will accept this responsibility, to stop this march to world war, and to open regional paths to economic development and peace.

This is epitomized by the proposed “Extended Oasis Plan for Southwest Asia” which must be implemented, now after 50 years since it was first proposed by the American economist and statesman Lyndon LaRouche, in order to restore peace in that region.


Page 1 of 50123...Last