Helga Video

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org or post them in the next live stream.

The follow-on continues to the Jan. 3 U.S. attack on Venezuela and abduction of its President Nicolas Maduro and his wife from Caracas. The two were arraigned today on 12 counts before a Federal judge in New York City, each declaring their innocence; the next court action is March 17. Maduro’s Vice President Delcy Rodriguez was sworn in today as Acting President, and has made mild statements about “cooperation” in the context of terror in her nation and the Caribbean. The death count from the U.S.’s Jan. 3 airstrikes and action in Venezuela is reported as 80, with 32 of them being deceased Cuban nationals.

Drilling and conveyance of oil in the nation is now near standstill, because the tank farms, and tankers at anchor, have reached their limit to be able to store any more, given the U.S. blockade of shipping. Later this week, the White House intends to host U.S. oil executives in Miami, Florida, to take over in the name of “rebuilding” in Venezuela.

President Donald Trump indicated last night that Colombia and Mexico are in line for U.S. intervention if Washington so decides, along with the takedown of Cuba. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the same. This evening Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller likewise declared on CNN that, “The United States should have Greenland.”

Trump said that Colombia “is run by a sick man who likes making cocaine and selling it to the United States. And he’s not going to be doing it very long, let me tell you.” He said of Mexico, that “in every single call I have offered troops” to President Claudia Sheinbaum.

This whole situation shows, as described on Jan. 5 by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Schiller Institute leader, that the world is in a new, “different phase” of breakdown. She also referred to the continued horror imposed on Gaza, the suppression of free speech in Europe, the operations against Iran, and more, as well as the U.S. being on a rampage in the Western Hemisphere.

On the particular looming danger of the United States placing nuclear-capable, long-range missiles in Germany this year, the International Peace Coalition, initiated by Zepp-LaRouche, released a statement on Jan. 5 for wide circulation and endorsement. Headlined, “International Peace Coalition Statement: Appeal to the American People, To President Trump, and To Congress!” the full text is below.

As of the time of preparation of this bulletin, a classified briefing on U.S. actions in Venezuela is being given, for the first time, by the Trump Administration to the Eight-Plus Congressional leaders of their two chambers, in particular, Armed Services and Intelligence. Many lawmakers are highly critical of Trump’s intervention, but unfortunately, only because Congress wasn’t briefed in advance, nor had it given authorization to the U.S. military buildup, and not because the lawmakers oppose the takeover of Venezuela and other nations.

In dramatic distinction, Diane Sare, twice former U.S. Senate candidate from New York, is providing briefings this week, in the course of organizing for her Jan. 10 kick-off campaign event in New York City for running for President of the United States as a LaRouche Independent.

On the Garland Nixon podcast today, Sare said that the U.S. attack on Venezuela “is an affront to the judgment of the world,” and explained why, and what are the responsibilities of the world to roll back the danger. She said, “I can’t believe you have Congressmen, such as my former Congressman Mike Lawler, saying, ‘This was absolutely required, and of course the President should not have told the Congress.’ That is so far from our Constitution, I find that absolutely astounding.”

The International Peace Coalition will hold its 136th consecutive meeting this Friday, Jan. 9.

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions, comments, and reports to questions@schillerinstitute.org or post them in the next live stream.

What sort of madness would lead people, in the face of the collapse of nearly every single global arms control and verification treaty—today only New START remains, until it too expires in February 2026—to explicitly and publicly propose to further proliferate nuclear weapons to the nations of Germany, Japan, and Canada? To argue that this will “strengthen the global order,” and provide “dependable protection against the threats of regional foes, such as China and Russia”?

The madness of those who speak for the bankrupt London-New York financial Establishment, is who, including their policy mouthpieces, such as Foreign Affairs magazine of the New York Council on Foreign Relations.

What sort of madness would cause them to propose to give nuclear weapons to a Germany which, under Chancellor Friedrich Merz, has announced it is girding for war against Russia within years, at most? To argue for nuclear arms to be under the control of a Takaichi government in Japan, which has just announced it could take military action against China to defend Taiwan?

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova drew out the implications of such madness: “We know how Japanese militarism ended. It would be good if those politicians who come to govern Japan remember this, understand where irresponsible statements lead, and refrain from making them.”

This is the same madness which is driving London and its European allies apoplectic over U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest effort to return U.S.-Russian negotiations over Ukraine to the approach both sides had agreed upon in the Aug. 15 Trump-Putin summit in Anchorage, Alaska. They are describing those efforts as “nauseating,” “worse than we thought,” and a “nightmare”—all because Trump and Putin have agreed that the issues which caused the war in the first place must be addressed.

It is also the madness behind Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s obsession with overthrowing the Maduro government in Venezuela, in order to embroil the Trump administration in another bloody forever war of exactly the sort he promised to never launch.

All of this is the madness borne of the desperation of the owners of the financially bankrupt system, who are trying to keep their system afloat through wars and economic looting—when it is no longer possible to do so.

The cure for the problem is therefore at hand. Lyndon LaRouche’s 2014 Four New Laws To Save the U.S.A. Now! Not an Option: An Immediate Necessity begins by stating bluntly:

“The economy of the United States of America, and also that of the trans-Atlantic political-economic regions of the planet, are, now, under the immediate, mortal danger of a general, physical-economic, chain-reaction breakdown-crisis of that region of this planet as a whole.”

The pathway LaRouche specified leading to the reorganization of the global physical economy around scientific drivers such as fusion energy and space colonization, begins with a return to the 1933 Glass-Steagall law of FDR. This would put the $2 quadrillion in speculative assets today asphyxiating the Western financial system through bankruptcy reorganization, and open the door to issuing productive credit in volumes needed to create physical economic conditions worthy of the dignity of Man—all 8 billion plus of us!

That is sanity.

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions, comments, and reports to questions@schillerinstitute.org or post them in the next live stream.

Yesterday, Nov. 16, the USS Gerald R. Ford, America’s largest aircraft carrier, arrived in the Caribbean. The same day U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement declaring the President of Venezuela Nicolás Maduro to be the head of a foreign terrorist group, the Cartel de los Soles. This puts two things in place for an imminent attack. U.S. military assets are now at full force posture in the region, including 15,000 troops, 12 destroyers, and multiple fighter jets. The U.S. legalism is now in place, that if the U.S. attacks Venezuela on sea or land, in the name of attacking a foreign terrorist individual or group, Washington will declare its actions lawful. This is based, in particular, on the statutes and practices asserted unilaterally by Washington since 9/11.

True, President Trump told reporters yesterday, that the U.S. “may be having some discussions” with Maduro, and that “Venezuela would like to talk….I’ll talk to anybody. We’ll see what happens.” What is that supposed to mean?

The danger of escalation to military action against Venezuela is of immediate concern, among a number of friction zones and hot conflicts in the world, in which the deepest fault line is the divide between the Global Majority nations, with their drive for infrastructure and economic development, and the Global North alignments of “old empire,” with their demand for dominance, and suppression of development.

EIR is hosting an emergency roundtable Thursday, Nov. 20, on the dangerous situation in the Caribbean, with expert discussion of the strategic and regional situations, including proposed solutions for the area and hemisphere. As the invitation states, “The United States has no reason to fear the BRI [Belt and Road Initiative] and the BRICS, and should instead cooperate with them in building those great projects. This approach could rapidly develop the entire Caribbean Basin region, and stop the real narco-trafficking and related migrant problems that will only be worsened by an attack on Venezuela.”

Schiller Institute leader Helga Zepp-LaRouche today, in reviewing the Caribbean and other crises, encouraged all to mobilize to understand what is taking place, and that there are solutions. “The outcome of all of that remains to be determined by, not least, our energetic intervention to put on a level of reason, which seems to be lacking for the most part, at least concerning Western policies.”

The context in which the face-off in the Caribbean has been whipped up, is that during both the Trump and Biden Administrations, and before, U.S. force and covert actions have moved through country by country in the Western Hemisphere to block economic independence and development, especially when those countries were working with China, and also Russia, on matters of economic and science projects.

In Mexico, for example, an operation was staged against the government on Nov. 15 in Mexico City, when international media used violent actions initiated by a smaller group of masked youth near the end of a “march” billed as an anti-government “Gen Z” protest to generate videos and media accounts worldwide, proclaiming that the youth of Mexico are protesting the failure of the government to take on drug traffickers. What happened was not as portrayed in the press, but rather is a text book ploy organized largely by foreign interests out to destabilize Mexico.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, however, in her morning press conference two days before the march, provided an expert to give details to the press on the networks responsible. For weeks, social media and other means were deployed, mostly from abroad, centered around the Atlas Foundation and other London-associated, radical networks, which are documented as behind other dirty operations in Central and South America. They were behind the overthrow of Dilma Rousseff and installation of Jair Bolsonaro as President in Brazil, for example. In Venezuela right now, the same networks are promoting Nobel Peace Prize winner Maria Corina Machado as the coming head of the hoped-for U.S. military installed government.

One instance where these dark operations got a setback yesterday, is in the elections in Ecuador. For months, American officials have visited the country, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and top U.S. military commanders, pushing the idea that the U.S. should be allowed to open a military base in Ecuador – which is currently prohibited by the Ecuadorian constitution – and otherwise imposing ongoing terms of trade amounting to looting the nation. President Daniel Noboa welcomed the U.S. intervention against Ecuador’s sovereignty, in conformity with his personal oligarchic background. But Ecuador voters yesterday roundly defeated—by over 60%—a measure that would have changed standing law to allow a foreign military base, and they voted down other nation-threatening measures as well.

On the world agenda, reconstruction in Gaza, toward full development throughout the entire Southwest Asia region, is a priority. This evening in the UN Security Council, the U.S.-circulated resolution on Washington’s plan for ongoing administration and rebuilding was passed by 13 to 0, with Russia and China abstaining. In speeches following the vote, the representative of China expressed profound disappointment at the way there has not been collaboration among nations to date, especially on the UN Security Council, but China abstained from voting, in consideration of the fragility in Gaza, and the imperative of maintaining a ceasefire.

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions, comments, and reports to questions@schillerinstitute.org or post them in the next live stream.

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions, comments, and reports to questions@schillerinstitute.org or post them in the next live stream.

“The content of policy is the method by which it is made.” That was the idea of statecraft espoused by Lyndon LaRouche, founder of Executive Intelligence Review and co-founder of the Schiller Institute. The question of method in statecraft was the topic of a two-day-plus conference just concluded by the Schiller Institute in Paris. The conference, led by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder of the Schiller Institute, and by Jacques Cheminade, former French Presidential candidate and president of Solidarité et Progrès (Solidarity and Progress), was titled “Emancipation of Africa and the Global Majority, A Challenge for Europe.”

Why, despite the increasing potential for thermonuclear war between NATO and Russia; despite the mounting panic regarding the looming financial meltdown of the hopelessly bankrupt trans-Atlantic system; despite the depopulation of Gaza, and the destruction ongoing in Sudan and several other locations—why was it the self-development of the African continent which was chosen in Paris as the focus of deliberation for the international participants, many of them young people, including from several African nations?

To understand this, contrast two speeches given on Nov. 9. One was by the President of Germany, Frank-Walter Steinmeier. The other was by Schiller Institute founder and chairwoman, Helga Zepp-LaRouche. Under the guise of commemorating “the significance of the date Nov. 9 in German history—in 1918 (abdication of German Kaiser and proclamation of the Weimar Republic), 1938 (beginning of the Kristallnacht/”Night of the Broken Glass” violence against Germany’s Jewish population and their various establishments), and 1989 (fall of the Berlin Wall), German President Steinmeier chose to stoke fear, claiming that there had been a rise of antisemitism since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel. His remarks led to calls for constitutional bans on emerging German political parties and other forms of censorship—the politics of fear.

Fortunately for current history, there are people that actually understand the role of the Classical artist in universal history, and therefore the role of poet Friedrich Schiller in Germany—including in the events of Nov. 9, 1989. Instead of the politics of fear, Helga Zepp-LaRouche, speaking to an audience in Paris, invoked the life, the work and living presence of the poet Friedrich Schiller.

“I can only advise you to read Schiller. Schiller, apart from LaRouche and Cusa and Plato and some others, but Schiller is one of the most important, because he came to the conclusion that in his time, people were already barbaric. He said, why is it that we are still barbarians? He said the most important task of our time—meaning his time—is to develop the Empfindungsvermögen. I have never found a good English translation, because if you just say ‘compassion,’ or ‘empathy,’ it does not quite capture it. What Schiller meant with Empfindungsvermögen is that you have to be able to educate your soul and your mind in such a way that you are able to absorb the world in an all-encompassing manner and feel compassion with the whole world; which means everything. It doesn’t just mean pity or empathy with people who are suffering; it also means to be able to always take in whatever is happening in the world, in your heart and your mind. It’s still not capturing it entirely, but it’s larger than the word empathy.…”

This is the idea that must immediately become the basis and the method of international policy. This is the soul of the idea of “promoting the General Welfare” contained in the United States Constitution’s Preamble.

Schiller, born on November 10, 1759, besides being a great historian and dramatist, was also Germany’s greatest poet. The Ninth Symphony of composer Ludwig van Beethoven is a setting of the spirit and a portion of the text of Schiller’s poem, An Die Freude (Ode To Joy). During the great transformation of 1989 that would culminate in the sudden, miraculous Nov. 9 fall, “by the consent of the governed,” of the Berlin Wall, which had stood for more than 27 years at the most lethal checkpoint in the world, the Ninth Symphony was not “the soundtrack of the revolution. “ The Ninth Symphony—the whole composition, not just its Fourth Movement—was the embodiment of the idea of Hope, hope for a better humanity that chooses, as did those who brought down the Berlin Wall, to deserve that freedom which is, according to the American Declaration of Independence, “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.”

The right to self-development, particularly for youth, such as the still-living children of Gaza, the 600 million African youth today under the age of 19, and the 1.2 billion African youth under the age of 25 who will be here in 25 years, is the policy; Schiller’s mission, for humanity to develop the Empfindungsvermögen required for such self-development, is the method by which that policy would be made. Guaranteeing that right through establishing a new international security and development architecture, discussed by Zepp-LaRouche in her Ten Principles, and a vigorous campaign worldwide by youth, for that purpose, including in work in national electoral and other processes as appropriate, is the immediate task before us.

The Two Largest Nuclear Powers: Cooperation, or Confrontation? Join EIR News on our YouTube channel today, November 5, at 10am EST/ 4pm CET for a live interview of the Russian Federation’s First Deputy Permanent Representative at the United Nations, Dmitry Polyanskiy, conducted by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, editor-in-chief of EIR. 

Join EIR News on our YouTube channel today, November 5, at 10am EST for a live interview of the Russian Federation’s First Deputy Permanent Representative at the United Nations, Dmitry Polyanskiy, conducted by Helga Zepp-LaRouche, editor-in-chief of EIR. 

The danger of nuclear extinction war has not abated, as Dr. Ted Postol of MIT showed in his October 24 comments to the International Peace Coalition. Nevertheless, a new paradigm of peace through development is shining through, as reflected in the circulation of the Bering Strait Tunnel project as a solution to the crisis in US-Russia relations, by Kirill Dmitriev, CEO of the Russian Direct Investment Fund. A representative of the RDIF participated in the October 22 EIR international roundtable discussion on the strategic implications of the Bering Strait Tunnel project, during which program Zepp-LaRouche shared her view:

“[T]he realization of the Bering Strait Tunnel is potentially and very likely the answer as to if we have war or peace. Because, if we get to an agreement between the two largest nuclear powers in the world, to replace confrontation with cooperation which is to the benefit not only of those two countries, but actually of all countries in the world, it can be the game changer which marks the departure from the present extremely dangerous moment in history.”

How does the Russian government view the strategic dynamic? What are the principles of the “polyphonic world order” advocated by Russian President Vladimir Putin? Join the program to learn more.

Subscribe, like, and share!