The relentless escalation of war provocations, when paired with the lying reports of a “coming economic boom” — both the product of the diseased minds of those running the “Military Industrial Complex” and pushing the “Great Reset” — is a threat to the people of all nations. No matter what economists say, a growing cancerous debt bubble is not a sign of economic health! As we forecast, these utopian schemes can be derailed. One example is the rejection by India’s Energy Minister of the “net zero” plan pushed by the Biden administration. To join us in defeating the push coming from the bankrupt Trans-Atlantic establishment, order your copy of our report here: “The Great Leap Backward”.
Today’s questions:1.) What can be done to avoid an economic blowout? What is the Fed doing? What about the budget/debt ceiling debate — Is there a way to avoid default?2.) Why do you think Yahoo News ran the story about Pompeo and the CIA plotting to kidnap or kill Julian Assange?3.) What makes you think we can trust the Taliban enough to contribute to rebuilding Afghanistan?
With all the hand-wringing and finger-pointing over events of the last two weeks in Afghanistan, two pivotal questions are not being discussed: Why were we there?; and what comes next? The LaRouche Organization insists that, until the truth about what happened on 9/11 becomes known, the same disastrous mistakes will be made again, next time on an even larger scale. Further, were these wars really mistakes, or instead were they deliberately designed, to keep the U.S. permanently ensnared in “endless wars”?
President Biden declared yesterday that the decision to leave Afghanistan is about “ending an era of military operations to remake other countries.” This raises the obvious question, what will replace this era, which has been characterized by “endless wars”? Will the U.S. and NATO continue to pursue, unilaterally, an arbitrary Rules-Based Order, demanding submission to the failed neoliberal policies insisted upon by globalist financial and corporate cartels? Or will civilization advance to policies based on economic cooperation among sovereign nations, committed to mutual benefit?
In the face of an overall frenzy of flight forward provocations coming from Washington, London and NATO, Russia’s President Putin addressed the Russian people — and the world — on April 21, in a speech described accurately in the western press as conveying a “stern warning.” However, the Fake News media did not present the whole picture, and provided nothing of the context for the speech: the sanctions policy, which is disrupting economies, causing famine and death in targeted countries; western sponsorship of regime change coups and Color Revolutions; and continuing wars, and military exercises, aimed at especially containing Russia and China. It is essential that Biden’s team take this speech seriously, and accept Putin’s offer to convene a summit of the Permanent 5 Members of the U.N. Security Council, before the world is plunged into catastrophe.
Most of those involved in dissections of “What Went Wrong in Afghanistan?” are missing the obvious point. What was wrong is the system, which placed the American military in a series on no-win wars, in defense of a “unipolar” world order which benefitted the few, i.e., those who run the global central banks and financial institutions on behalf of City of London and Wall Street interests. That system should be buried, and replaced by a new system, which can bring lasting peace through economic development. The era of “endless wars”, of “Color Revolutions” to conduct “regime change”, has been exposed on a global stage by the western military withdrawal from Afghanistan. Good Riddance to that system — we can now enter the era in which Development Is the Name of Peace.
Many questions were raised by viewers about our coverage this week of the hysterical British reaction to the decision to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, and Biden standing firm in that commitment, despite the attacks on him. Would the British unleash a terror attack to change the policy? Could they? It has happened before! Whether that happened yesterday, it is interesting that several viewers stated that there should be an investigation of whether the British played a role in the attack, noting that if they were so sure an attack was coming, why could they not prevent it? harleysch@gmail.com
As charges and counter-charges proliferate, and military forces are in motion, the danger of war in eastern Ukraine is increasing daily. While blaming Russia for “malign intent”, the actual cause of the tension is the geopolitical intent for regime change in Russia, which has escalated since the Maidan coup in Ukraine in February 2014. President Biden was Obama’s point man in organizing that coup, and has a long record as an anti-Russian war hawk, typified by his recent admission that he believes Russian President Putin is a “killer.” One of his top advisors on Russia, Michael Carpenter, has openly praised the self-avowed neo-Nazi and former top Ukrainian security official and member of parlaiment Andriy Parubiy.
Two stories in the last days provide new insights into the deadly and corrupt practices of operatives of the “Deep State”. Yahoo News exposed planning undertaken by then-CIA Director Pompeo to kidnap or assassinate Julain Assange, for the “crime” of exposing the dirty wars run by the military/intelligence/corporate establishment that Pompeo wanted to protect. And two Presidents of regional Federal Reserve branches resigned, when reports were published of their personal trading of financial instruments which were affected by the Fed’s Quantitative Easing policy. The defenses offered by Pompeo and Fed chair Powell are unconvincing, as they move to cover-up the bigger crimes they are trying to keep hidden.
As unfolding developments in Afghanistan have captured most people’s attention, Federal Reserve officials will hold their annual Jackson Hole, Wyoming confab on Friday, during which they will confer on how to proceed with the Great Reset swindle without tipping off too many people as to their real intent. While they engage in “Fed-speak” on such topics as “transitory inflation” and “tapering”, what they really are doing is consolidating a global central banker’s dictatorship, to hand the biggest banks and financial institutions control over fiscal, i.e., spending policy. The only way to counter this drive for depopulation, is to mobilize for the implementation of LaRouche’s “Four Laws”, to revive physical production as an alternative to a bankrupt neoliberal speculative system.
