PDF of this statement<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nSometimes, obscenity is most luridly displayed in the form of what is \u201chidden in plain view.\u201d The normally unspoken premise, that the world\u2019s population must be radically reduced \u201cby any means necessary,\u201d and with which many at the UN and its non-governmental organizations tacitly agree, was once openly expressed in 1991 in the words of Alexander King, in the Club of Rome\u2019s \u201cThe First Global Revolution:\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” <\/p>\n\n\n\n
If fewer people is the unspoken goal, control of food production and supply is essential. Those self-selected \u201cpark rangers for the human race,\u201d including Ubermenschen like 60-billion dollar Mike Bloomberg, UN Special Envoy on Climate Ambition and Solutions, and Mark Carney, 2019 Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance and the former Governor of the Bank of England, believe that they can use \u201cfinancial regime change\u201d to corral many nations of Africa, Asia and Ibero-America into submission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The \u201cgreen elites\u201d claim they possess superior knowledge about the planet, giving them the right to change the behavior of \u201cinferior societies,\u201d almost always located in the Southern hemisphere. Henry Kissinger, whose 1974 NSSM-200 report, \u201cImplications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests, asked, \u201cWould food be considered an instrument of national power? … Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can\u2019t\/won\u2019t control their population growth?\u201d He would have applauded their answer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Various globalist committees have assumed the responsibility to cleanse the planet of the unfit, the poor, infirm and inconvenient, who are now no longer even referred to as people– they are merely \u201ccarbon footprints.\u201d The \u201cgreen elect\u201d must act, when the rest of humanity cannot, or will not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In former times, this brutality was known by the term colonialism or neo-colonialism. Now, in the age of universal surveillance, it might be termed \u201ccyber-colonialism,\u201d or \u201ccrypto-colonialism,\u201d etc. So, the intent to urgently rid the world of the \u201credundant, unwanted and unnecessary\u201d people of Africa, South America and Asia, for example, is dressed up in the formal attire of \u201cdeep concern for the future of the planet,\u201d and the need to \u201csupervise backward nations, failed states and irresponsible environmental actors.\u201d To clean up the dirty carbon footprint of the \u201cgreat unwashed,\u201d it may be necessary to place a friendly foot on their necks by using sanctions, including food as a weapon, \u201cfor the good of the Earth.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Now the United Nations is about to host a set of meetings where well-fed bureaucrats will pretend concern, but stick with their food weaponry. Doing this in the midst of a pandemic, with the imminent starvation of up to a half billion persons, and of the ongoing disruption of national borders throughout the planet, is an obscene display of what in U.S. criminal law, is \u201cdepraved indifference.\u201d Under the Nuremberg Tribunal code, \u201cthey knew, or should have known.\u201d Grandiose declarations about issuing billions of doses of vaccines will do no good if the people who are supposed to be inoculated are already dead from starvation, dehydration, or exposure. The question is, is that underlying de-population process the actual intent?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
One must ask that question, considering the lack of response that David Beasley of the World Food Program has received, to his repeated pleas regarding Afghanistan, Haiti, and other nations that are either on the verge, or in the throes of catastrophes which can, in fact, be either averted or alleviated. The idiocy of not providing the most vulnerable areas of the world with the most help possible, including at the onset of last year’s coronavirus pandemic. has already worsened the world\u2019s condition for all of us in ways we do not have the information to yet know. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
A world health platform–clean water, food, medicine and the correlate emergency infrastructure required for their delivery, is the minimum physical pre-condition needed for the durable survival of every nation on the planet, no matter what their politics. That is the only human response. This is also now our only sure way to not only \u201ckeep pace,\u201d but get out ahead of the impending biological holocaust that mankind faces.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Economist Lyndon LaRouche\u2019s May 7, 1985 essay, \u201cThe Role of Economic Science in Projecting Pandemics as a Feature of Advanced Stages of Economic Breakdown,\u201d published in a Special Report issued by Executive Intelligence Review entitled Economic Breakdown and the<\/em> Threat of Global Pandemics<\/em> was distributed throughout the United Nations and to many other institutions a full 36 years ago. The emergency medical circumstances of 2020-21, therefore, does not \u201ccatch us by surprise.\u201d Those from the UN and their respective governments were informed back at the time; they chose not to act. They were then guilty of depraved indifference, of malignant neglect. <\/p>\n\n\n\nMobilize the Food, The Farmers Know How<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Today, the challenge is: Can the United Nations–can you–do any better? There is an immediate, life-saving test. Today, the world must drop everything–as it was caused to drop everything last year, when the pandemic erupted–and do what is necessary to feed, on an emergency basis, everyone on the planet that is presently food insecure, in every country on Earth. This takes a principled, anti-Malthusian act, but it also protects even the selfish on the planet from dying of unknown as well as known infections, suddenly imported and contracted from unknown sources. This effort requires use of most, if not all technological-productive capabilities available, agricultural and industrial. This must be done in the service of humanity, and not a company, cartel, military establishment, or oligarchy intent on using food as a weapon. And collaborating on this food mobilization is the first step to establishing the cooperation required for a world health platform to successfully function. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
People are not responsible for the pandemic, earthquakes, or floods. They are not starving as a result of a specific crime–unless one thinks, as do the Malthusians, that \u201cthe crime was their being born.\u201d The crime, rather, is holding conferences about \u201cnature-based solutions to food production\u201d and \u201cworld hunger summits,\u201d as you ignore the death all around you.
The world\u2019s farmers, food aid distributors, and people are ready to accept the monumental task of an immediate, emergency feeding of all humanity. The place to begin is Afghanistan. It is an exemplary situation in which many nations once opposed to each other can in the words of Isaiah, \u201cbeat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.\u201d If you feed the people, you suppress the appetite for war. We need, not a \u201cGreat Reset,\u201d but a \u201cGreat Reversal\u201d of policy, including food policy. We need a worldwide anti-Malthusian resistance. People come first! Join the Schiller Institute Committee for a Coincidence of Opposites in its campaign for a World Health Platform.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
PDF of this statement Sometimes, obscenity is most luridly displayed in the form of what is \u201chidden in plain view.\u201d The normally unspoken premise, that the world\u2019s population must be radically reduced \u201cby any means necessary,\u201d and with which many at the UN and its non-governmental organizations tacitly agree, was once openly expressed in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":76303,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[842],"class_list":["post-79750","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-allgemein","tag-lang-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/schillerinstitute.com\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79750","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/schillerinstitute.com\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/schillerinstitute.com\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/schillerinstitute.com\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/schillerinstitute.com\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=79750"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/schillerinstitute.com\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79750\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":79753,"href":"https:\/\/schillerinstitute.com\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79750\/revisions\/79753"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/schillerinstitute.com\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/76303"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/schillerinstitute.com\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=79750"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/schillerinstitute.com\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=79750"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/schillerinstitute.com\/el\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=79750"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}