Highlights | Calendar | Music | Books | Concerts | Links | Education | Health
What's New | LaRouche | Spanish Pages | Poetry | Maps
Dialogue of Cultures
Affirm the Mendelssohn
Lyndon H. LaRouche
The following is an excerpt from a May 13 memorandum from Lyndon LaRouche to his associates, urging "a specific type of fresh emphasis" on the global relationship between the Phaedon of Moses Mendelssohn (1729-1786) and the dialogues of Plato. "This must situate Mendelssohn," he wrote, "as a central figure of those influenced by Abraham Kästner's crucial role in the mid-Eighteenth-Century launching of the German Classical movement of Lessing, Mendelssohn, et al."
After one has sorted out the carnage of Hitler's efforts to exterminate the legacy of Mendelssohn and the Yiddish Renaissance, the authorship of what has been since called the Shoah, is traced proximately to the existentialist followers of the anti-semite and syphilitic dionysiac Friedrich Nietzsche, including such as Nazi philosopher Martin Heidegger and the degenerate Jews of Heidegger's cronies among the Frankfurt School circles of Adorno and Hannah Arendt. (An angry Jew might erupt with the remark against all those heathen existentialists: "Be like Nietzsche: die of syphilis!")
The crucial bench-mark from with which to begin mapping the task before us, is that a fascist Jew, such as Jabotinsky, is like any other fascist, such as Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, or the Brzezinski-Huntington crew. He is only accidentally a Jew, and essentially a fascist like Hitler, as the worst of Israel's Likudniks are demonstrating that currently. Indeed, such Likudniks are carrying on Hitler's work, in effect, by turning their Jewish recruits into fascists; soon, were they successful, there would be no real Jews left.
Thus, the hope of a durable peace hangs upon an ecumenical solidarity among Christians, Muslims, and those Jews who accept the principle of Genesis 1: that men and women are each made equally in the image of the Creator, set apart from, and above the beasts, to exert the Creator's dominion in the universe about us. Historically, there is no more relevant exponent of such an ecumenical basis than Lessing's real-life "Nathan der Weise," his friend and collaborator, Moses Mendelssohn.
However, the river of blood which has flowed between Israeli and Arab for the greater part of a century, will not be staunched with a mere literal doctrine. There must be a deeper, actually cognitive insight of the type expressed by Mendelssohn's Phaedon. This is, first and foremost, my personal responsibility, since I am the only leading political figure on the world-scene presently, who efficiently represents the same platonic standpoint from which the work of Leibniz, Kästner, Lessing, and Moses Mendelssohn flowed.
We have recently emerged from a century in European civilization, whose characteristic has been that growing philosophical mediocrity, that low-life pragmatism and single-issuism, which is also typified (you should blush) by those formerly among us who succumbed to compromise with the same fascist gnosticism rampant in the Arlington Diocese. The world has few left, who could be described as "philosophers" without an epidemic of blushing throughout the halls of a witting academia. I need make no broad claims, other than being virtually "the last of the Mohicans" inhabiting a land where real philosophical minds once lived.
Treaties, programs and doctrines will not provide a durable basis for Middle East peace. Such attempts have already failed all too often. There must an elementary, deep-going philosophical basis for a peace; nothing superficial can staunch the decades' rising tide of blood. Mendelssohn typifies that basis: partly because he is a true ecumenical figure, an ecumenical Orthodox Jew to the time of his death. More important: he understands the meaning of the soul, as I do. Only when we put forward the concept of the cognitive nature of the immortal soul, as Mendelssohn speaks to Plato, does history make moral sense. When we attempt to balance the account of our dead from our past, with our obligation to the future to come after our mortal existence, can we define that kind of quality of immortal self-interest embodied in our momentary, mortal selves, which is needed to bring forth a great instrument of peace, something akin today, to the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia. The Jew must find his soul's place in a peace of the Middle East, as the existence of Germany today depends still upon the deep principle adopted as the first article of agreement to the Treaty of Westphalia.
The nub of the matter is a clear, cognitive comprehension of the immortal historic interest of a brief mortal existence.
We come, born to the present, as a visiting traveller in time. We must come as an angel, to bring some good, a good which may help to heal the wounds of the past, console the living, and bring forth progress to a better future. We come, briefly, to dwell thus in past, present, and future, all at once. In that respect we are immortal, yet, the paradox is, that we can act so only through the medium of our mortality.
Yet, if we bring the discovery of what are truly discovered, or rediscovered universal physical principles, and if we cause those to be shared and transmitted, several wonderful, immortal consequences are gained. Such ideas not only change the present and future; they also fulfill the implicit hopes of those from the past, who may have suffered horribly in the course of their struggle to make the present possible, and thus change the outcome of their having lived. Thus, we act with the determination, that nothing good which occurs in the simultaneity of eternity shall ever be wasted. Then, perhaps, there will come a time, in which we shall understand more fully what time itself was all about.
While you are mastering the deeper implications of Gauss's discoveries from the period leading to the publication of his Disquisitiones, read the relevant work of both Plato and Moses Mendelssohn from that vantage-point in cognitive practice. With that in view, remember that Moses Mendelssohn did more than anyone to free the Jew of Austria and Germany to become a citizen of his nation; today, his work is a crucial selection of rallying point to rally Israel and Arabs alike for an urgently needed escape from a Likudnik existentialists' Hell. Put the Phaedon on the table, and say, ever so simply, to Israeli and Arab like: Let there be perpetual peace and fraternity between us.
The combined will and power of the U.S.A. and other nations could stop the war; but only ecumenical bonds can secure the peace.
 See Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., "Dialogue on the Fundamentals of Sound Policy"; Bruce Director, "Fundamental Theorem: Gauss's Declaration of Independence,", and "Bringing the Invisible to the Surface,"
Articles About Moses Mendelssohn
Articles About the Middle East
EIR Arabic Website (in Arabic language)
The Schiller Institute
Thank you for supporting the Schiller Institute. Your membership and contributions enable us to publish FIDELIO Magazine, and to sponsor concerts, conferences, and other activities which represent critical interventions into the policy making and cultural life of the nation and the world.
Contributions and memberships are not tax-deductible.
Home | Search | About | Fidelio | Economy | Strategy | Justice | Conferences | Join